Skip to main content
Log in

Who's In Charge Of Quality? The Governance Issues In Quality Assurance

  • Published:
Tertiary Education and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This essay, exploring the general question of how quality assurance has changed the relationship between government and higher education, discusses two important issues of governance: what is the proper role of government? and what are the appropriate forms of academic involvement in decisions about quality assurance? It seeks to reaffirm some principles of shared governance in ensuring quality and suggests how these principles could apply to key decision points in quality assurance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Association of University Professors (1996). Policy Documents and Reports. Washington, DC: AAUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R.A. (1990). The Idea of Higher Education. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, R.A. (1994). The Limits of Competence: Knowledge, Higher Education and Society. London: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J. & Shah, T. (1997). Quality Assessment, Decision-Making and Institutional Change, Tertiary Education and Management 3(2), 157-164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, E.E. & Tierney, W.E. (1988). Collegiate Culture and Leadership Strategies. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E. (1998). Strong State Action but Limited Results: Perspectives on University Resistance, European Journal of Education 33(3), 317-330.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Khawas, E., DePietro-Jurand, R. & Holm-Nielsen, L. (1998). Quality Assurance in Higher Education: Recent Progress, Challenges Ahead. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, K. (1990). Culture and Conflict in Academic Organizations, Journal of Educational Administration 27(3), 30-54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A. & El-Khawas, E. (forthcoming). Using the Performance Dimension: Converging Paths for External Accountability? In H. Eggins (ed.), Higher Education Reform.

  • Mackie, D., Martin, J. & Thomson, K. (1995). Autonomy versus Accountability: Maintaining the Delicate Balance, Tertiary Education and Management 1(l), 62-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massaro, V. (1997). Learning from Audit? Preliminary Impressions from a Survey of OECD Countries. In Quality Assurance as Support for Processes of Innovation. Stockholm: The National Agency for Higher Education, 9-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave, G. & van Vught, F.A. (eds) (1991). Prometheus Bound: The Changing Relationship between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J.H., Smith, D.G., Corak, K.A. & Yamada, M.M. (1994). Strategic Governance. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education/Oryx Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Higher Education Supplement (THES) (2000). April 14, 14 and i-iv.

  • van Vught, F. & Westerheijden, D. (1993). Quality Management and Quality Assurance: Methods and Mechanisms. Luxembourg: European Community.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El-Khawas, E. Who's In Charge Of Quality? The Governance Issues In Quality Assurance. Tertiary Education and Management 7, 111–119 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011346403401

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011346403401

Keywords

Navigation