Advertisement

Journal of Economic Growth

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 107–133 | Cite as

Income Distribution and the Demand Constraint

  • Anandi Mani
Article

Abstract

This paper argues thatthe interaction between inequality and the demand patterns forgoods is a potential source of persistent inequality. Incomedistribution, in the presence of non-homothetic preferences,affects the demand for goods and, due to differences in factorintensities across sectors, it alters the return to factors ofproduction and the initial distribution of income. Low inequalityleads to high demand for medium skilled intensive goods, providinga bridge over which low skill dynasties may transition to thehigh-skilled sector in the long run. Under high inequality however,the initial lack of demand for medium skilled labor breachesthis bridge from poverty to prosperity and inequality persists.

inequality demand constraint non-homothetic preferences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aghion, P., and P. Bolton. (1997). “A Theory of Trickle Down Growth and Development,” Review of Economic Studies 64, 151–172.Google Scholar
  2. Andreoni, J. (1989). “Giving with Impure Altruism: Applications to Charity and Ricardian Equivalence,” Journal of Political Economy 97, 1147–1458.Google Scholar
  3. Baland, J-M., and R. Debraj. (1991). “Why Does Asset Inequality Affect Unemployment? A Study of the Demand Composition Problem,” Journal of Development Economics 35, 275–303.Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, A. V., and A. F. Newman. (1993). “Occupational Choice and the Process of Development,” Journal of Political Economy 101, 274–298.Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, A. V., and A. F. Newman. (1991). “Risk Bearing and the Theory of Income Distribution,” Review of Economic Studies 58, 211–235.Google Scholar
  6. Benabou, R. (1996). “Inequality and Growth,” NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 11–74.Google Scholar
  7. Carnoy, M. in collaboration with J. Lobo, A. Toledo, and J. Velloso. (1979). Can Educational Policy Equalize Income Distribution in Latin America? Saxon House, International Labor Organisation.Google Scholar
  8. Copeland, B., and A. Kotwal. (1996). “Product Quality and the Theory of Comparative Advantage,” European Economic Review 40, 1747–1760.Google Scholar
  9. Deininger, K., and L. Squire. (1998). “New Ways of Looking at Old Issues: Inequality and Growth,” Journal of Development Economics 107, 259–287.Google Scholar
  10. de Janvry, A., and E. Sadoulet. (1983). “Social Articulation as a Condition for Equitable Growth,” Journal of Development Economics 13, 275–303.Google Scholar
  11. Eswaran, M., and A. Kotwal. (1993). “A Theory of Real Wage Growth in LDCs,” Journal of Development Economics 42, 243–269.Google Scholar
  12. Galor, O., and O. Moav. (1999). “From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation Inequality in the Process of Development,” Brown University, Dept. of Economics, working paper 99–27.Google Scholar
  13. Galor, O., and J. Zeira. (1993). “Income Distribution and Macroeconomics,” Review of Economic Studies 60, 35–52.Google Scholar
  14. Goldin, C., and R. Margo. (1992). “The Wage Structure in the United States at Mid-Century,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 1–34.Google Scholar
  15. Hunter, L. (1991). “The Contribution of Non-Homothetic Preferences to Trade,” Journal of International Economics 30, 345–358.Google Scholar
  16. Kaldor, N. (1957). “Alternative Theories of Distribution,” Review of Economic Studies 23, 83–100.Google Scholar
  17. Keynes, J. M. (1920). The Economic Consequences of Peace. MacMillan and Co.Google Scholar
  18. Kindleberger, C. (1989). Economic Laws and Economic History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Langoni, C. (1973). A Distribucao da Renda e Desenvolvimento Economico do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Expressao e Cultura.Google Scholar
  20. Lluch, C., A. Powell, and R. Williams. (1977). Patterns in Household Demand and Saving. Washington, D.C.: published for the World Bank by Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Loury, G. C. (1981). “Intergenerational Transfers and the Distribution of Earnings,” Econometrica 49, 843–867.Google Scholar
  22. Mani, A. (1998). “The Impact of Income Distribution and Demand Composition on Economic Development,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University.Google Scholar
  23. Mankiw, G. N., D. Romer, and D.Weil. (1992). “A Contribution to the Empirics of Economic Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107, 407–437.Google Scholar
  24. Matsuyama, K. (2000). “The Rise of Mass Consumption Societies,” Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science, Kellogg Graduate School of Management, Northwestern University, discussion paper no. 1289.Google Scholar
  25. Morley, S., and J. Williamson. (1974). “Demand, Distribution and Employment, The Case of Brazil,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 33–60.Google Scholar
  26. Murphy, K. J., A. Schleifer, and R. W. Vishny. (1989). “Income Distribution, Market Size and Industrialization,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 103, 537–564.Google Scholar
  27. Owen, A., and D. Weil. (1998). “Intergenerational Earnings Mobility, Inequality and Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics 41, 71–104.Google Scholar
  28. Piketty, T. “The Dynamics of the Wealth Distribution and the Interest Rate with Credit Rationing,” Review of Economic Studies 64, 173–189.Google Scholar
  29. Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. (1995). “Quality and Trade,” Journal of Development Economics 8, 1–15.Google Scholar
  30. Talmain, G., and C-H. Chou. (1996). “Redistribution and Growth: Pareto Improvements,” Journal of Economic Growth 1, 505–523.Google Scholar
  31. Teitel, S. (1976). “Labor Homogeneity, Skill Intensity and Factor Reversals-an International Comparison,” Journal of Development Economics 3, 355–366.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anandi Mani
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsVanderbilt UniversityNashville
  2. 2.Economic Growth CenterYale UniversityNew Haven

Personalised recommendations