Relation of Self-Efficacy to Reported Pain and Pain Medication Usage During Labor

  • Amy Fuller Stockman
  • Elizabeth M. Altmaier
Article

Abstract

We studied the relationship of self-efficacy to reported labor pain and pain medication usage among 43 women. Self-efficacy ratings were judgments of confidence regarding successful completion of tasks involved in labor and delivery (e.g., doing breathing exercises) and in overcoming barriers (e.g., nonsupportive partner). Multiple regression analyses revealed that self-efficacy significantly contributed to predicting labor pain beyond other relevant variables (e.g., age, amount of menstrual pain), with barrier self-efficacy the strongest predictor. Results are discussed in the context of increasing women's confidence in overcoming barriers by incorporating relevant interventions in childbirth education.

labor pain self-efficacy childbirth education 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Bandura, A. (1977). Self–efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1982). Self–efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37, 122–147.Google Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Cogan, R. (1975). Comfort during prepared childbirth as a function of parity, reported by four classes of participant observers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 19, 33–37.Google Scholar
  5. Cogan, R., Henneborn, W., & Klopfer, F. (1976). Predictors of pain during prepared childbirth. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 20, 523–533.Google Scholar
  6. Cogan, R., Perkowski, S., & Anderson, D. (1988). Memories of labor and birth: Reliability of postpartum questionnaire reports. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 67, 75–79.Google Scholar
  7. Condiotte, M., & Lichtenstein, E. (1980). Self–efficacy and relapse in smoking cessation programs. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 49, 648–658.Google Scholar
  8. Davenport–Slack, B., & Boylan, C. H. (1974). Psychological correlates of childbirth pain. Psychosomatic Medicine, 36, 215–223.Google Scholar
  9. Lowe, N. K. (1987). Individual variation in childbirth pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 7, 183–192.Google Scholar
  10. Manning, M. M., & Wright, T. L. (1983). Self–efficacy expectancies, outcome expectancies, and the persistence of pain control in childbirth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 421–431.Google Scholar
  11. Melzack, R. (1975). The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain, 1, 277–299.Google Scholar
  12. Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1982). The challenge of pain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Melzack, R., Taenzer, P., Feldman, P., & Kinch, R. A. (1981). Labour is still painful after prepared childbirth. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 125, 357–363.Google Scholar
  14. Nettelbladt, P., Fagerstrom, C., & Uddenberg, N. (1976). The significance of reported childbirth pain. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 20, 215–221.Google Scholar
  15. Niven, C., & Gijsbers, K. (1984). A study of labour pain using the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Social Science and Medicine, 19, 1347–1351.Google Scholar
  16. O'Driscoll, K., & Meagher, D. (1986). Active management of labor. London: Balliere Tindall.Google Scholar
  17. Ohnhaus, E. E., & Adler, R. (1975). Methodological problems in the measurement of pain: A comparison between the Verbal Rating Scale and the Visual Analogue Scale. Pain, 1, 374–384.Google Scholar
  18. Turk, D. C., & Melzack, R. (Eds.). (1992). Handbook of pain assessment. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wallenstein, S. L., Heidrich, G., Kaiko, R., & Houde, R. W. (1980). Clinical evaluation of mild analgesics: The measurement of clinical pain. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 10, 319–327.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amy Fuller Stockman
    • 1
    • 2
  • Elizabeth M. Altmaier
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of MedicineUniversity of IowaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesia, College of MedicineUniversity of IowaUSA
  3. 3.College of EducationUniversity of IowaUSA
  4. 4.College of Public HealthUniversity of IowaUSA

Personalised recommendations