Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Analysis of Marginal Count Failure Data

  • Published:
Lifetime Data Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manufacturers want to assess the quality andreliability of their products. Specifically, they want to knowthe exact number of failures from the sales transacted duringa particular month. Information available today is sometimesincomplete as many companies analyze their failure data simplycomparing sales for a total month from a particular departmentwith the total number of claims registered for that given month.This information—called marginal count data—is, thus,incomplete as it does not give the exact number of failures ofthe specific products that were sold in a particular month. Inthis paper we discuss nonparametric estimation of the mean numbersof failures for repairable products and the failure probabilitiesfor nonrepairable products. We present a nonhomogeneous Poissonprocess model for repairable products and a multinomial modeland its Poisson approximation for nonrepairable products. A numericalexample is given and a simulation is carried out to evaluatethe proposed methods of estimating failure probabilities undera number of possible situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • H. Ascher and H. Feingold, Repairable Systems Reliability, Marcel Dekker: New York, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with discussion),” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 39, pp. 1–38, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. A. Escobar and W. Q. Meeker, “Statistical prediction based on censored life data,” Technometrics, 41, pp. 113–124, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Kalbfleisch, J. F. Lawless and J. A. Robinson, “Methods for the analysis and prediction of warranty claims,” Technometrics, 33, pp. 273–285, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. F. Lawless, “Statistical analysis of product warranty data,” International Statistical Review, 66, pp. 41–60, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. A. Louis, “Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 44, pp. 226–233, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Masuda, M. Usui and K. Suzuki, “Analysis of product life based on limited product history,” Journal of Reliability Engineering Association of Japan, 21, pp. 122–130, 1999 (in Japanese).

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Suzuki, “Nonparametric estimation of lifetime distribution from a record of failures and follow-ups,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 80, pp. 68–72, 1985a.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Suzuki, “Estimation of lifetime parameters from incomplete field data,” Technometrics, 27, pp. 263–271, 1985b.

    Google Scholar 

  • K. Suzuki, “Analysis of field failure data from a nonhomogeneous Poisson process,” Report of Statistical Application Research, 34, pp. 6–15, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Tortorella, “Life estimation from pooled discrete renewal counts,” in N. P. Jewell et al. (eds.), Lifetime Data: Models in Reliability and Survival Analysis, Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, 1996, pp. 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karim, M.R., Yamamoto, W. & Suzuki, K. Statistical Analysis of Marginal Count Failure Data. Lifetime Data Anal 7, 173–186 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011300907152

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011300907152

Navigation