Abstract
This response to the articles of Luzzati and Broekman (in this issue)addresses principally the character of early rabbinic legalinterpretation, as viewed by the Rabbis themselves. It considers, withexamples, their concept of ``simple meaning'' (peshat), and itsplace within their overall hermeneutic system and its theologicalpresuppositions. The second section responds more briefly to thetheoretical critiques of Luzzati and Broekman, stressing that (myversion of) semiotics is descriptive rather than normative; resists thereduction of textual meaning to interpretation; and refuses to equatedecision-making with justification. I suggest that traces of traditionaltheological positions may be discerned in the normativist positions ofmy interlocutors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jackson, B.S. Literal Meaning and Rabbinic Hermeneutics: A Response to Claudio Luzzati and Jan Broekman. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 14, 129–141 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011297408750
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011297408750