Turing Test: 50 Years Later


The Turing Test is one of the most disputed topics in artificial intelligence, philosophy of mind, and cognitive science. This paper is a review of the past 50 years of the Turing Test. Philosophical debates, practical developments and repercussions in related disciplines are all covered. We discuss Turing's ideas in detail and present the important comments that have been made on them. Within this context, behaviorism, consciousness, the `other minds' problem, and similar topics in philosophy of mind are discussed. We also cover the sociological and psychological aspects of the Turing Test. Finally, we look at the current situation and analyze programs that have been developed with the aim of passing the Turing Test. We conclude that the Turing Test has been, and will continue to be, an influential and controversial topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Abelson, RP. (1968), Simulation of Social Behavior', in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, eds. Handbook of Social Psychology Reading, MA.: Addison Wesley, pp. 274-356.

  2. Alper, G. (1990), 'A Psychoanalyst Takes the Turing Test', Psychoanalytic Review 77 (1), pp. 59-68.

  3. Anderson, D. (1987), 'Is the Chinese Room the Real Thing?', Philosophy 62, pp. 389-393.

  4. Barresi, J. (1987), 'Prospects for the Cyberiad: Certain Limits on Human Self-Knowledge in the Cybernetic Age', Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 17, pp. 19-46.

  5. Bieri, P. (1988), 'Thinking Machines: Some Reflections on the Turing Test', Poetics Today 9(1), pp. 163-186.

  6. Block, N. (1978), 'Troubles with Functionalism', in C.W. Savage, ed, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 9: Perception and Cognition, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.

  7. Block, N. (1981), 'Psychologism and Behaviorism', Philosophical Review 90, pp. 5-43.

  8. Block, N. (1995), 'The Mind as the Software of the Brain', In D. Osherson, L. Gleitman, S. Kosslyn, E. Smith and S. Sternberg, eds., An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

  9. Boden M. (1988), 'Escaping from the Chinese Room', in Computer Models of the Mind, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  10. Bringsjord, S. (1992), What Robots Can and Can't Be, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

  11. Bringsjord, S. (1994), 'Could, How Could We Tell If, and Should-Androids Have Inner Lives?', in K.M. Ford, C. Glymour and P. Hayes, eds. Android Epistemology, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, pp. 93-122.

  12. Bringsjord, S. (1996), 'The Inverted Turing Test is Provably Redundant'. Psycoloquy 7(29).

  13. Chomsky, N. (1975), Reflections on Language, Pantheon.

  14. Clark, T. (1992), 'The Turing Test as a Novel Form of Hermeneutics', International Studies in Philosophy 24(1), pp. 17-31.

  15. Colby, K.M. (1981), 'Modeling a Paranoid Mind', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4(4), pp. 515-560.

  16. Colby, K.M. Hilf, F.D. and Weber, S. (1971), 'Artificial Paranoia', Artificial Intelligence 2, pp. 1-25.

  17. Colby, K.M. Hilf, F.D., Weber, S. and Kraemer, (1972), 'Turing-like Indistinguishability Tests for the Validation of a Computer Simulation of Paranoid Processes', Artificial Intelligence 3, pp. 199-222.

  18. Cole, D.J. (1991), 'Artificial Intelligence and Personal Identity', Synthese 88, pp. 399-417.

  19. Collins, H.M. (1990), Artificial Experts: Social Knowledge and Intelligent Machines, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.

  20. Collins, H.M. (1997), 'The Editing Test for the Deep Problem of AI', Psycoloquy 8(1).

  21. Copeland, B.J. (1993), 'The Curious Case of the Chinese Gym', Synthese 95, pp. 173-186.

  22. Cowley, S.J. and MacDorman, K.F. (1995), 'Simulating Conversations: The Communion Game', AI and Society 9, pp. 116-137.

  23. Crockett, L. (1994), 'The Turing Test and the Frame Problem: AI's Mistaken Understanding of Intelligence, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

  24. Davidson, D. (1990), 'Turing's Test', in K.A. Said, M. Said, W.H. Newton-Smith, R. Viale and K.V. Wilkes, eds. Modelling the Mind, Oxford, UK: Claredon Press, pp. 1-11.

  25. Dennett, D (1992), Consciousness Explained, Boston, MA.: Little, Brown & Co.

  26. Dewdney, A. (1992), 'Turing Test', Scientific American 266(1), pp. 30-31.

  27. Dyer, M. (1990), 'Intentionality and Computationalism: Minds, Machines, Searle and Harnad', Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 2, pp. 303-319.

  28. Epstein, R. (1992), 'The Quest for the Thinking Computer', AI Magazine 13(2), pp. 81-95.

  29. Feigenbaum, E.A. (1996), 'How the "What" Becomes the "How"', Communications of the ACM 39(5), pp. 97-105.

  30. Fetzer, J.H. (1993), 'The TTT is not the Final Word', Think 2(1), pp. 34-86.

  31. Fetzer, J.H. (1995), 'Minds and Machines: Behaviorism, Dualism and Beyond', Stanford Electronic Humanities Review 4(2).

  32. Flood, G. (1996), 'If Only They Could Think: Should the Turing Test be Blamed for the Ills that Beset Artificial Intelligence', New Scientist 149(2012), pp. 32-35.

  33. Fodor, J.A. (1991), 'Yin and Yang in the Chinese Room', in D. Rosenthal, ed., The Nature of the Mind, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  34. Ford, K. and Hayes, P. (1996), 'The Turing Test is Just as Bad When Inverted', Psycoloquy 7(43).

  35. Forsyth, R (1988), 'The Trouble With AI', Artificial Intelligence Review 2(1), pp. 67-77.

  36. French, R. (1990), 'Subcognition and the Limits of the Turing Test', Mind 99(393), pp. 53-65.

  37. French, R. (1995), 'Refocusing the Debate on the Turing Test: A Response'. Behavior and Philosophy 23, pp. 59-60.

  38. French, R. (1995), 'The Inverted Turing Test: A Simple (Mindless) Program that Could Pass It', Psycoloquy 7(39).

  39. Galatzer-Levy, R.M. (1991), 'Computer Models and Psychoanalytic Ideas: Epistemological Applications', Society for Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy Bulletin 6(1), pp. 23-33.

  40. Genova, J. (1994a), 'Response to Anderson and Keith', Social Epistemology 8(4), pp. 341-343.

  41. Genova, J. (1994b), 'Turing's Sexual Guessing Game', Social Epistemology 8(4), pp. 313-326.

  42. Guccione, S. and Tamburrini, G. (1988), 'Turing's Test Revisited', in Proceedings of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 1. Beijing and Shenyang, China, pp. 38-41.

  43. Guillen, M.A. (1983), 'The Test of Turing', Psychology Today 17(12), pp. 80-81.

  44. Gunderson, K. (1964), 'The Imitation Game', Mind 73 pp. 234-245.

  45. Gunderson, K. (1967), Mentality and Machines, New York, NY: Doubleday.

  46. Halpern, M. (1987), 'Turing's Test and the Ideology of Artificial Intelligence', Artificial Intelligence Review 1(2), pp. 79-93.

  47. Harnad, S. (1989), 'Minds, Machines and Searle', Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1(1), pp. 5-25.

  48. Harnad, S. (1990), 'The Symbol Grounding Problem', Physica D 42, pp. 335-346.

  49. Harnad, S. (1991), 'Other Bodies, Other Minds: A Machine Incarnation of an Old Philosophical Problem', Minds and Machines 1, pp. 43-54.

  50. Harnad, S. (1992), 'The Turing Test is not a Trick: Turing Indistinguishability is a Scientific Criterion', SIGART Bulletin 3(4), pp. 9-10.

  51. Harnad, S. (1994), 'Does Mind Piggyback on Robotic and Symbolic Capacity? in H. Morowitz and J. Singer, eds. The Mind, the Brain, and Complex Adaptive Systems, Reading, MA.: Addison Wesley.

  52. Harnad, S. (1998), 'Turing Indistinguishability and the Blind Watchmaker', in G. Mulhauser, ed. Evolving Consciousness Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

  53. Hauser, L. (1993), 'Reaping the Whirlwind: Reply to Harnad's “Other Bodies, Other Minds”', Minds and Machines 3, pp. 219-237.

  54. Hauser, L. (1997), 'Searle's Chines Box: Debunking the Chinese Room Argument', Minds and Machines 7, pp. 199-226.

  55. Hayes, B. (1998), 'Turing's Test', Muse 8.

  56. Hayes, P. and Ford, K. (1995), 'Turing Test Considered Harmful', in Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1, pp. 972-977.

  57. Hayes, P., Harnard, S., Perlis, D. and Block, N. (1992), 'Virtual Symposium on Virtual Mind', Minds and Machines 3(2), pp. 217-238.

  58. Henley, T.B. (1990), 'Chauvinism and Science: Another Reply to Shanon', Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 20(1), pp. 93-95.

  59. Hodges, A. (1983), Alan Turing: The Enigma, New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

  60. Hofstadter, D.R. (1982), 'The Turing Test: A Coffee-House Conversation', in D. Hofstadter and D. Dennett, eds. The Mind's I: Fantasies and Reflections on Self and Soul, London, UK: Penguin Books, pp. 69-95.

  61. Jacquette, D. (1993a), 'A Turing Test Conversation', Philosophy 68, pp. 231-233.

  62. Jacquette, D. (1993b), 'Who's Afraid of the Turing Test', Behavior and Philosophy 20, pp. 63-74.

  63. Johnson-Laird, P. (1988), The Computer and the Mind, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

  64. Karelis, C. (1986), 'Reflections on the Turing Test', Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 16, pp. 161-172.

  65. Kugel, P. (1986), 'Thinking May Be More Than Computing', Cognition 22, pp. 137-198.

  66. Kugel, P. (1990), 'Is It Time to Replace Turing's Test?', 1990Workshop Artificial Intelligence: Emerging Science or Dying Art Form. Sponsored by SUNY Binghamton's Program in Philosophy and Computer and Systems Sciences and AAAI.

  67. Lassegue, J. (1988), 'What Kind of Turing Test did Turing Have in Mind?', Tekhnema 3, pp. 37-58.

  68. Leiber, J. (1989), 'Shanon on the Turing Test', Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 19(2), pp. 257-259.

  69. Leiber, J. (1992), 'The Light Bulb and the Turing-Tested Machine', Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22, pp. 25-39.

  70. Leiber, J. (1995), 'On Turing's Turing Test and Why the Matter Matters', Synthese 105, pp. 59-69.

  71. Loebner, H.G (1994), 'In Response', Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 37, pp. 79-82.

  72. Lucas, J. (1996), 'Minds, Machines and Gödel', Philosophy 36, pp. 112-127.

  73. Lucas, J. (1996), 'Minds, Machines and Gödel: A Retrospect', in P. Millican and A. Clark, eds. Machines and Mind, Oxford UK: Oxford University Press.

  74. Maloney, J. (1987), 'The Right Stuff', Synthese 70, pp. 349-372.

  75. Marinoff, L. (1995), 'Has Turing Slain the Jabberwock?', Informatica 19(4), pp. 513-526.

  76. Mauldin, M. (1994), 'Chatterbots, Tinymuds and the Turing Test: Entering the Loebner Prize Competition', in Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 1, Seattle, WA, pp. 16-21.

  77. Mays, W. (1952), 'Can Machines Think?', Philosophy 27, pp. 148-162.

  78. McIlvenny, P. (1993), 'Constructing Societies and Social Machines: Stepping out of the Turing Test Discourse', Journal of Intelligent Systems 2(2-4), pp. 119-156.

  79. Michie, D. (1990), 'The Superarticulacy Phenomenon in the Context of Software Manufacture', in D. Partridge and Y. Wilks, eds.: The Foundations of Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, pp. 411-439.

  80. Michie, D. (1994), 'Consciousness as an Engineering Issue, Part 1'. Journal of Consciousness Studies 1(2), pp. 52-66.

  81. Michie, D. (1995), 'Consciousness as an Engineering Issue, Part 2', Journal of Consciousness Studies 2(1), pp. 182-195.

  82. Michie, D. (1996), 'Turing's Test and Conscious Thought' in P. Millican and A. Clark, eds. Machines and Thought: The Legacy of Alan Turing, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 27-51. Originally printed in Artificial Intelligence 60, pp. 1-22, 1993.

  83. Millar, P.H. (1973), 'On the Point of the Imitation Game', Mind 82, pp. 595-597.

  84. Minsky, M. (1985), 'Communication with Alien Intelligence', in E. Regis, ed. Extraterrestrials: Science and Alien Intelligence, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

  85. Moon, Y., Naas, C., Morkes, J., Kim, E.-Y. and Fogg, B. (1994), 'Computers are Social Actors', in Proceedings of the CHI Conference, Boston, MA, pp. 72-78.

  86. Moor, J.H. (1976), 'An Analysis of the Turing Test', Philosophical Studies 30, pp. 249-257.

  87. Moor, J.H. (1978), 'Explaining Computer Behavior', Philosophical Studies 34, pp. 325-327.

  88. Narayanan, A. (1996), 'The Intentional Stance and the Imitation Game', in P. Millican and A. Clark, eds. Machines and Thought: The Legacy of Alan Turing, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 63-79.

  89. Parsons, H. (1990), 'Turing on the Turing Test', in W. Karwowski and M. Rahimi, eds. Ergonomics of Hybrid Automated Systems II, Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  90. Pinksy, L. (1951), 'Do Machines Think About Thinking', Mind 60(239), pp. 397-398.

  91. Platt, C. (1995), 'What's It Mean To Be Human, Anyway?', Wired.

  92. Purtill, R.L. (1971), 'Beating the Imitation Game', Mind 80, 290-294.

  93. Rankin, T. (1987), 'The Turing Paradigm: A Critical Assessment', Dialogue 29, pp. 50-55.

  94. Reader, A. (1969), 'Steps Toward Genuine Artificial Intelligence', Acta Psychologica 29(3), pp. 279-289.

  95. Rey, G. (1986), 'What's Really Going on in the Chinese Room?', Philosophical Studies 50, pp. 196-285.

  96. Richardson, R. (1982), 'Turing Tests for Intelligence: Ned Block's Defense of Psychologism', Philosophical Studies 41, pp. 421-426.

  97. Roberts, L. (1990), 'Searle's Extension of the Chinese Room to Connectionist Machines', Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2, pp. 185-187.

  98. Sampson, G. (1973), 'In Defence of Turing', Mind 82, pp. 592-594.

  99. Saygin, A.P. (1999), 'Turing Test and Conversation', Master's thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey. Technical Report BU-CEIS-9911.

  100. Schweizer, P. (1998), 'The Truly Total Turing Test', Minds and Machines 8, pp. 263-272.

  101. Searle, J.R. (1980), 'Minds, Brains and Programs', Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 417-424.

  102. Searle, J.R. (1990), 'Is the Brain's Mind a Computer Program?', Scientific American 3(262), pp. 26-31.

  103. Shanon, B. (1989), 'A Simple Comment Regarding the Turing Test', Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 19(2), pp. 249-256.

  104. Shanon, B. (1991), 'Chauvinism: A Misdirected Accusation', Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior 21(3), pp. 369-371.

  105. Sharma, R. and Conrath, D. (1993), 'Evaluating Expert Systems: A Review of Applicable Choices', Artificial Intelligence Review 7(2), pp. 77-91.

  106. Shieber, S.M. (1994), 'Lessons from a Restricted Turing Test', Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 37, pp. 70-78.

  107. Stalker, D. (1978), 'Why Machines Can't Think: A Reply to James Moor', Philosophical Studies 34, pp. 317-320.

  108. Stevenson, J.G. (1976), 'On the Imitation Game', Philosophia 6, pp. 131-133.

  109. Turing, A. (1950), 'Computing Machinery and Intelligence', Mind 59(236), pp. 433-460.

  110. Turing, A. (1969), 'Intelligent Machinery', in D.M.B. Meltzer ed. Machine Intelligence 5, Edinburgh University Press, pp. 3-23. Originally, a National Physics Laboratory Report, 1948.

  111. Wallace, R.S. (1997), 'The Lying Game', Wired.

  112. Watt, S. (1996), 'Naive Psychology and the Inverted Turing Test', Psycoloquy 7(14). 14.

  113. Weizenbaum, J. (1996), 'ELIZA-A Computer Program for the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Men and Machines', Communications of the ACM 9, pp. 36-45.

  114. Weizenbaum, J. (1976), Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation, San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman.

  115. Whalen, T. (1995), 'How I Lost the Contest and Re-Evaluated Humanity',

  116. Whitby, B. (1996), 'The Turing Test: AI's Biggest Blind Alley?', in P. Millican and A. Clarke, eds. Machines and Thought: The Legacy of Alan Turing, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 53-63.

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pinar Saygin, A., Cicekli, I. & Akman, V. Turing Test: 50 Years Later. Minds and Machines 10, 463–518 (2000) doi:10.1023/A:1011288000451

Download citation

  • chatbots
  • Chinese Room
  • consciousness
  • Imitation Game
  • intelligence
  • Loebner Contest
  • philosophy of mind
  • Turing Test