Skip to main content

Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet – diversity, potential use and determination of a core collection of this multi-purpose tropical legume

Abstract

Two germplasm collections of Lablab purpureus L. Sweet totalling 249 accessions were grown in the field in Australia and Ethiopia and characterised using a common set of morphological and agronomic (M-A) attributes. Data from each site were analysed separately using multi-variate analysis and a classification constructed for each collection. There was considerable diversity within both collections, especially that maintained in Ethiopia. Time to flowering, seed weight, and plant height were the most important attributes in determining group allocation in both classifications. Both collections had a high proportion of L. purpureus subsp. purpureus, especially accessions similar to the Australian cultivars Highworth and Rongai. They also had good representation of the less common L. purpureus subsp. uncinatus Verdc. less common landraces and wild collections from either Africa or India. When combined, the two classifications provided an overview of diversity and highlighted the similarities and dissimilarities between the two collections. The vast range in plant types supported the view that lablab has the capacity to be a multi-purpose legume for both commercial and smallholder agriculture. Some important and less common germplasm identified were Ethiopian domesticated subsp. uncinatus, Ethiopian subsp. purpureus landraces collected from regional markets, semi-domesticated and wild accessions from southern Africa, and wild accessions from India. Using this overview, a core collection of germplasm was selected, which provides researchers with a sound basis for future plant breeding and agronomic studies with this important tropical legume.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  • Belbin L. 1987. PATN. Pattern Analysis Package Reference Manual. CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Rangelands, Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belbin L. 1991. Semi-strong hybrid scaling, a new ordination algorithm. J. Vegetation Sci. 2: 491–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown A.H.D. 1995. The core collection at the crossroads. In: Hodgkin T., A.H.D. Brown, van Hintum Th. J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds.). Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 3–19, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke J.A., Kretschmer A.E. Jr., Reed C.F. and Weder J.K.P. 1981. Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet. In: Duke J.A. (ed.). Handbook of Legumes of World Economic Importance, pp. 102–106, Plenum Press, New York, USA and London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzowela B.H. 1993. Advances in forage legumes: A subSahara African perspective. Proceedings of the XVII International Grassland Congress, New Zealand and Queensland, Australia, vol. 3, pp. 2115–2119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith D.P., Minchin P.R. and Belbin L. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel G.H. 1984. Genetic perspectives of germplasm conservation. In: Arber W., Lilmensee K., Peacock W.J. and Starlinger P. (eds.). Genetic Manipulation: Impact on Man and Society, pp. 161–170, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland J.F. and Mullen C.L., 1995. Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet (lablab) cv. Koala. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 35: 559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C.J. 1996. Genetic diversity and relationships among Lablab purpureus genotypes evaluated using RAPD markers. Euphytica 90: 115–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu C.J. 1998. Lablab cv. Endurance. Plant Varieties J. 11: 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass B.L., Pengelly B.C. and Wiedow C. (2001) Morphological and agronomic variation in three Lablab purpureus germplasm collections. Genetic Resources Communication CSIRO Tropical Agriculture, Brisbane Australia (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • NAS. 1979. Lablab bean. In: NAS. Tropical Legumes: Resources for the Future, pp. 59–67, National Academy of Sciences (NAS), Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oram R.N. 1990. Register of Australian Herbage Plant Cultivars, 3rd edn., pp. 173–174, CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pengelly B.C., Maass B.L., Thomas B.D. and Hacker J.B. 1997. Origin of the world' collection of the tropical forage legume Chamaecrista rotundfolia. Proceedings of the XVIII International Grassland Congress, Winnipeg, Manitoba, and Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, Vol. 1, Session 1, pp. 25–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner D.Z., Bauchan G.R., Auricht G. and Hughes S. 1999. Developing a core collection from a large annual Medicago germplasm collection. In: Johnson R.C. and Hodgkin T. (eds.). Core Collections for Today and Tomorrow, p. 61–67, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI), Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smartt J. 1985. Evolution of grain legumes. II. Old and new world pulses of lesser economic importance. Exp. Agric. 21: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tohme J., Jones P., Beebe S. and Iwanaga N.I. 1995. The combined use of agroecological and characterisation data to establish the CIAT Phaseolus vulgaris core collection. In: Hodgkin T., Brown A.H.D. Th. van Flintum J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds.). Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 95–107, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdcourt B. 1970. Lablab Adans. In: Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoideae for the ‘Flora of Tropical East Africa’: III. Kew Bull. 24: 409–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verdcour B. 1971. Lablab. In: Milne-Redhead E. and Polhill R.M. (eds.). Flora of Tropical East Africa, pp. 696–699, Crown Agents, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wills B.J., Douglas G.B., Foote A.G. and Trainor K.D. 1999. Germplasm characterization and palatability of Dorycnium species under New Zealand dryland conditions. Plant Genet. Resources Newslett. 20: 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonezawa K., Nomura T. and Morishima H. 1995. Sampling strategies for use in stratified germplasm collections. In: Hodgkin, T., Brown A.H.D., Th. van Hintum J.L. and Morales E.A.V. (eds.). Core Collections of Plant Genetic Resources, pp. 35–53, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pengelly, B.C., Maass, B.L. Lablab purpureus (L.) Sweet – diversity, potential use and determination of a core collection of this multi-purpose tropical legume. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48, 261–272 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011286111384

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011286111384

  • Core collection
  • Lablab
  • Ley legume
  • Tropical forage
  • Tropical pulse crop