Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Communication Bottleneck in Knitwear Design: Analysis and Computing Solutions

  • Published:
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Communication between different members of a designteam often poses difficulties. This paper reports onthe results of a detailed empirical study ofcommunication in over twenty British, German andItalian knitwear companies. The knitwear designprocess is shared by the designers, who plan thevisual and tactile appearance of the garments, and thetechnicians, who have to realise the garment on aknitting machine. They comprise a typical but smalldesign team whose members have different backgroundsand expertise. Knitwear design allows a detailedanalysis of the causes and effects of communicationbreakdown. Designers specify their designsinaccurately, incompletely and inconsistently;technicians interpret these specifications accordingto their previous experience of similar designs, andproduce garments very different from the designers'original intentions. Knitwear is inherently difficultto describe, as no simple and complete notationexists; and the relationship between visual appearanceand structure and technical properties of knittedfabric is subtle and complex. Designers andtechnicians have different cognitive approaches andare very different people. At the same time theinteraction between designers and technicians is badlymanaged in many companies. This paper argues thatimproving the accuracy and reliability of designers'specifications would significantly enhance the designprocess. It concludes with a description of thearchitecture of an intelligent automatic design systemthat generates technically correct designs from thedesigners' customary notations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agar, M. (1980): The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. London, UK: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R.J. (1994): Representations and Requirements: The Value of Ethnography in System Design. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 8, pp. 151–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub, P. and E. Frankenberger (1999): Analysis of Design Projects, Design Studies vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 465–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G., I. Jacobson and J. Rumbaugh (1998): Unified Modeling Language User Guide. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L.L. (1988): An Ethnographic Perspective on Engineering Design, Design Studies, vol. 9, pp. 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994): Designing Engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burda (1975): Freude am Stricken. Offenburg, Germany: Verlag Aenne Burda GmbH & Co., p. 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burda (1988): Grosses Strickmusterhelf. Offenburg, Germany: Verlag Aenne Burda GmbH & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J.S. (1998): The Neglect of Feedback in Engineering Design Organisations, Design Studies, vol. 19, pp. 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, S.A. (1988): A Use of Drawing Surfaces in Different Collaborative Settings, Proceedings of CSCW'88. Portland, OR: ACM Press, pp. 250–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bly, S.A and S.L. Minneman (1990): Commune: A Shared Drawing Surface, Proceedings of the Office Information System Conference. Boston, MA, pp. 184–193.

  • Cross, N.G. (1989): Engineering Design Methods. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N.G. and A.C. Cross (1995): Observation of Teamwork and Social Processes in Design. Design Studies, vol. 16, pp.143–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. and G. Button (1998): On “Technomethodology”: Foundational Relationships Between Ethnomethodology and System Design. Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 13, pp. 395–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M. (1997): Intelligent Support for Knitwear Design, PhD Thesis, Department of Design and Innovation, Milton Keynes, UK: The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M. (1997b): 'Design Inspiration and Design Performance', Proceedings of the 78th World Conference of the Textile Institute, Thessaloniki, Greece: The Textile Institute, vol. 1, pp. 369–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M. and H.E. Bez (2000): A Garment Design System Using Constrained Bézier Curves, International Journal of Clothing Science & Technology, vol.12, No 2, pp. 134–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M., N.G. Cross and J.H. Johnson (1998): Intelligent Support for Communication Diffi-culties in Conceptual Design. Proceedings of Computer Aided Conceptual Design' 98, Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University Engineering Design Centre, pp. 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M., N.G. Cross and J.H. Johnson (2000): Intelligent Support for Communication in Design Teams: Garment Shape Specifications in the Knitwear Industry, Design Studies, vol. 21, pp. 99–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M. and A. Demaid (1997): Concurrent Design, Proceedings of the 78th World Conference of the Textile Institute. Thessaloniki, Greece: The Textile Institute, vol. 3, pp. 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M., I. Kelly and M.K. Stacey (1999): Interactive Generative Systems for Conceptual Design: An Empirical Perspective, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, vol. 13, pp. 303–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M. and M.K. Stacey (1994): CAD Systems and the Division of Labour in Knitwear Design. In A. Adam, J. Emms, E. Green and J. Owen (eds.): Women, Work and Computerization: Breaking Old Boundaries - Building New Forms. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland, pp. 409–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M. and M.K. Stacey (1995): An Architecture for the Intelligent Support of Knitwears Design. In J.E.E. Sharpe (ed.): AI System Support for Conceptual Design. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag, pp. 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M. and M.K. Stacey (1999): Adaptation of Sources of Inspiration in Knitwear Design. Cambridge University Engineering Department, Technical Report CUED/C-EDC/TR80.

  • Eckert, C.M. and M.K. Stacey (2000): Sources of Inspiration: a Language of Design, Design Studies, vol. 21, pp. 523–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckert, C.M., M.K. Stacey and J. Wiley (1999b): Expertise and Designer Burnout, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Engineering Design. Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich, vol. 1, pp. 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlenspiel, K. (1995): Integrierte Produktentwicklung, Munich, Germany: Carl Hanser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, M. and K. Scott (1999): UML Distilled, 2nd ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, V. (1995): Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G. (1991): The Dialectics of Sketching. Creativity Research Journal, vol. 4, pp. 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt, G. (1994): On Visual Design Thinking: The Vis Kids of Architecture. Design Studies, vol. 15, pp. 158–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodland, M. and C. Slater (1995): SSADM Version 4: A Practical Approach. Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K. (1999): On Line and on Paper. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley M. and P. Atkinson (1995): Ethnography: Principles in Practice. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollan, J. and S. Stornetta (1992): Beyond Being There. Proceedings of CHI'92, Monterey, CA: ACM Press, pp. 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H. and K. Minoru (1992): ClearBoard: A Seamless Medium for Shared Drawing and Conversation with Eye Contact, Proceedings of CHI'92. Monterey, CA: ACM Press, pp. 525–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, I., G. Booch and J. Rumbaugh (1999): The Unified Software Development Process. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. (1993): Case-Based Reasoning, San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvan, T., R. West and A.H. Vera (1997): Tools and Channels of Communication: Dealing with the Effects of Computer Mediation on Design Communication. Proceedings of Creative Collaboration in Virtual Communities' 97, Sydney, Australia: University of Sydney. http://www.arch.su.edu/kcdc/conferences/VC97/papers/west.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofland, J. (1995): Analytic Ethnography: Features, Failings, and Futures, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, vol. 24, no.1, pp. 30–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäkirinne-Croft, P., W. Godwin and S. Saadat (1996): A Conceptual Model of the Fashion Design Process, Cheltenham & Gloucester College of Higher Education, Report for: EPSRC/DIP GR/H84475.

  • McFadzean, J., N.G. Cross and J.H. Johnson (1999): Notation and Cognition in Conceptual Sketching, Proceedings of VR'99, Visual and Spatial Reasoning in Design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. (1992): How to Apply the Anthropological Observation Technique of Participatory Observation to Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Men, and Cybernetics, vol. 22 no. 5 pp. 983–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minneman, S.L. (1991): The Social Construction of a Technical Reality: Empirical Studies of Group Engineering Design Practice, PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Xerox Palo Alto Research Center report SSL-91-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minneman, S.L. and S.A. Bly (1990): Experiences in the Development of Multi-user Drawing Tools. Proceedings of the Third Guelph Symposium on Computer Mediated Communication, Guelph, Canada, pp. 154–167.

  • Minneman, S.L. and S. Harrison (1999): The DrawStream Station: A Tool for Distributed and Asynchronous Chats About Sketches and Artifacts, Proceedings of HCI'99, Munich, Germany, pp. 221–225.

  • Moran, T.P., W. van Melle and P. Chiu, P. (1998): Spatial Interpretation of Domain Objects Integrated into a Freeform Electronic Whiteboard, Proceedings of UIST 98, San Francisco: ACM Press, pp. 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, I. and J. Lee (1994): Conversations with Graphics: Implications for the Design of Natural Language/Graphics Interfaces, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, vol. 40, pp. 509–541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell, A. (1981): The Knowledge Level, AI Magazine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–20. Also published in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 18, pp. 87-127, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G. and W. Beitz (1996): Engineering Design, trans. K. Wallace, L. Blessing and F. Bauert. London, UK: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1989): The Emperor's New Mind. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. and D. Sanderson (1998): Coordinating Joint Design Work: the Role of Communication and Artefacts. Design Studies, vol. 19, pp. 273–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purcell. A.T. and J.S. Gero (1998): Drawings and the Design Process. Design Studies, vol. 19, pp. 389–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pycock, J. and J. Bowers (1996): Getting Others to Get it Right: An Ethnography of Design Work in the Fashion Industry, Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Work' 96, Cambridge MA: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaugh, J., M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy and W. Lorensen (1990): Object-OrientedModeling and Design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, M., E. Curtis and C. Hill (1994): Interdisciplinary Collaboration: A Case Study of Software Development for Fashion Designers, Interacting with Computers, vol. 6, pp. 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. (1983): The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. NewYork, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D.A. and G.A. Wiggins (1992): Kinds of Seeing and Their Function in Designing. Design Studies, vol. 13, pp. 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, A.Th., H. Akkermans, A. Anjewierden, R. de Hoog, N. Shadbolt, W. van de Velde and R. Wielinga (1999): Knowledge Engineering and Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, A.Th., R. Wielinga and J.A. Breuker (1993): KADS: A Principled Approach to Knowledge-Based System Development. London, UK: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrivener, S., S. Clark, A. Clarke, J. Connolly, S. Garner, H. Palmén, M. Smyth and A. Schappo (1993): Real-Time Communication Between Dispersed Work Groups Via Speech and Drawing. Wirtschaftsinformatik, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A.C., J.E. Clayton and E.L. Gibson (1991): A Practical Guide to Knowledge Acquisition, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shima Seiki (1996): Total Knitting System, Sales Brochure, Shima Seiki Europe, Milton Keynes, UK.

  • Spencer, D. (1989): Knitting Technology, Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, T. (1996): On Knowledge Level Theories of Design Process. In J.S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds.): Artifical Intelligence in Design' 96. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 561–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithers, T. (1998): Towards Knowledge Level Theories of Design Process. In J.S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds.): Artifical Intelligence in Design' 96, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, M.K. and C.M. Eckert (1999): An Ethnographic Methodology for Design Process Analysis. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Engineering Design. Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich, vol. 3, pp. 1565–1570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, M.K. and C.M. Eckert (2000): Against Ambiguity. COOP 2000 Workshop Proceedings: The Role of Objects in Design Collaboration: Communicating through Physical and Virtual Objects, Sophia Antipolis, France: INRIA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, M.K., C.M. Eckert and J. McFadzean (1999): Sketch Interpretation in Design Communication. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Engineering Design. Munich, Germany: Technical University of Munich, vol. 2, pp. 923–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S.L. (1989): The Structure of Ill-Structured Solutions: Heterogeneous Problem-Solving, Boundary Objects, and Distributed Artificial Intelligence. In L. Gasser and M.N. Huhns (eds.): Distributed Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, Menlo Park, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symon, G. (1998): The Work of IT System Developers in Context: An Organisational Case Study, Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 13, pp. 33–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J.C. (1989): Listing, Drawing and Gesturing in Design: A Study of the Use of Shared Workspaces by Design Teams. PhD Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA. Xerox Palo Alto Research Center report SSL-89-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J.C. (1991): Findings from Observational Studues of Collaborative Work. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, vol. 34, pp. 143–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J.C. and L. Leifer (1988): A Framework for Understanding the Workspace Activity of Design Teams. Proceedings of CSCW'88. Portland, OR: ACM Press, pp. 226–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J.C. and S.L. Minneman (1990): VideoDraw: Video Interface for Collaborative Drawing, Proceedings of CHI'90, Seattle, WA: ACM Press, pp. 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J.C. and S.L. Minneman (1991): VideoWhiteboard: Video Shadows to Support Remote Collaboration, Proceedings of CHI'91, New Orleans, LA: ACM Press, pp. 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman, D., D. Herling and B. D'Ambrosio (1997): What to Do Next: Using Problem Status to Determine the Course of Action, Research in Engineering Design, vol. 9, pp. 214–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universal (1996): Pattern Presentation Unit, Sales Brochure, Universal Maschinenfabrik, Westhausen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viller, S. and I. Sommerville (1999): 'Coherence: An Approach to Representing Ethnographic Analyses in System Design', Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 14, pp. 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valkenburg R. and K. Dorst (1998): The Reflective Practice of Design Teams. Design Studies, vol. 19, pp. 249–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, A. (1996): Towards a Methodology for Case Adaptation, Proceedings of 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chichester, UK: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, A., B. Bartsch-Spörl and and R. Oxman (1996): A Study of Case Adaptation Systems. In J.S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds.): Artificial Intelligence in Design' 98. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, I., M. Buscher, P. Morgensen and D. Shapiro (1999): Spaces for Creating Context and Awareness - Designing a Collaborative Virtual Work Space for (Landscape) Architects. Proceedings of HCI'99, Munich, Germany, pp. 283–287.

  • Wielinga, B.J., A.Th. Schreiber and J.A. Breuker (1992): KADS: A Modelling Approach to Knowledge Engineering. Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 4, pp. 5–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineering Design Centre, Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, CB2 1PZ, UK

    Claudia Eckert

Authors
  1. Claudia Eckert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eckert, C. The Communication Bottleneck in Knitwear Design: Analysis and Computing Solutions. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 10, 29–74 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011280018570

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011280018570

Search

Navigation