Skip to main content
Log in

'Technoscience' Education: Empowering Citizens Against the Tyranny of School Science

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The status quo for school science and technology is unacceptable. While the former often is required for admission to university engineering, as well as to science programmes, the latter is deemed most appropriate for less able, concrete thinkers. This situation persists, despite the fact school science tends to generate large groups of citizens who are relatively scientifically and technologically illiterate, largely as a result of its preoccupation with identifying and training potential scientists and engineers. This practice is tyrannical. It must be abandoned forthwith. A realistic alternative is a combined technology and science programme – perhaps called 'technoscience' education – that would treat science and technology as equals. Such courses may, as well, be more democratic in the sense that technological problem solving often is more natural to everyday situations that everyone may find useful, not just future scientists or engineers. A framework for combined technology and science courses is described and defended here. Originally developed through collaborative action research amongst practising teachers of science, the approach appears to be feasible, under certain – perhaps ideal – conditions. A number of changes to science and technology education may be necessary for broader implementation, not the least of which is a general retrenchment in expectations for pre-determined learning, along with adjustments to teacher education. Nevertheless, the approach is recommended because of its emphasis on: personalization, inclusion, problematization, explicitness, apprenticeship, authenticity, contextualization and freedom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science, The [AAAS]: 1967, Science-A Process Approach, AAAS, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • AAAS: 1989, Science for All Americans: A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology, AAAS, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aikenhead, G. S. & Jegede, O. J.: 1999, ‘Cross-Cultural Science Education: A Cognitive Explanation of a Cultural Phenomenon’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(3), 269-287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W.: 1990, Ideology and Curriculum, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain-Smith, D.: 1985, Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. & Pearlman-Avnion, S.: 1999, ‘Who Will Teach an Integrated Program for Science and Technology in Israeli Junior High Schools?: A Case Study’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(2), 239-253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. & Raz, E.: 2000, ‘Hot-Air Balloons Project-Centered Study as a Bridge Between Science and Technology Education’, Science Education 84, 27-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beane, J. A. & Apple, M. W.: 1995, ‘The Case for Democratic Schools’, in M. W. Apple & J. A. Beane (eds.), Democratic Schools, ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L.: 1995, Towards a More Authentic and Feasible Science Curriculum for Secondary Schools. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L.: 1996, ‘Correlational Studies in School Science: Breaking the Science-experiment-certainty Connection’, School Science Review 78(282), 95-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L.: 2000a, ‘Democratic Constructivist Science Education: Enabling Egalitarian Literacy and Self-actualization’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 32(6), 847-865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L.: 2000b, ‘Procedural Apprenticeship in School Science: Constructivist Enabling of Connoisseurship’, Science Education 84(6), 727-739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bencze, J. L.: In Press, 'subverting the “Corporatist Manifesto”’, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education.

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.: 1989, ‘Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning’, Educational Researcher 18(1), 32-42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. L.: 1994, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cajas, F.: 1999, ‘Public Understanding of Science: Using Technology to Enhance School Science in Everyday Life’, International Journal of Science Education 21(7), 765-773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, W. & Kemmis, S.: 1986, Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research, Falmer, Lewes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M.: 1992, ‘Teacher as Curriculum Maker’, in P. W. Jackson (ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (A Project of AERA), MacMillan, New York, 363-401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G.: 1991, Educating the Inquiring Mind: The Challenge for School Science, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBoer, G. E.: 2000, ‘Scientific Literacy: Another Look at its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and its Relationship to Science Education Reform’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(6), 582-601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DfE/WO: 1995, Science in the National Curriculum, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durant, J., Evans, G. & Thomas, G.: 1989, ‘The Public Understanding of Science’, Nature 340, 11-14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, J.: 1954, The Technological Society (Trans. J. Wilkinson), Vintage, New York, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ely, M.: 1991, Doing Qualitative Research: Circles within Circles, Falmer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett, B.: 1990, Public Eye: An Investigation into the Disappearance of the World, Grove Weidenfeld, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. & Gardner, P. L.: 1994, ‘Technology Education and Science Education: A New Relationship?’, in D. Layton (ed.), Innovations in Science and Technology Education, Vol. V, UNESCO, Paris, 159-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J. & Harlen, W.: 1999, ‘School Science and Public Understanding of Science’, International Journal of Science Education 21(7), 755-763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, U.: 1990, The Real World of Technology. In CBC Massey Lectures, CBC Enterprises, Toronto, 1990, 10-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P.: 1970, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Continuum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaines, B. R. & Shaw, M. L. G.: 1993, ‘Knowledge Acquisition Tools based on Personal Construct Psychology’, Knowledge Engineering Review 8(1), 49-85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, P. L.: 1999, ‘The Representation of Science-technology Relationships in Canadian Physics Textbooks’, International Journal of Science Education 21(3), 329-347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geen, A.: 1991, ‘The Nature of Technology: Some Lessons for the National Curriculum’, Curriculum 12, 26-38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H.: 1989, Border Pedagogy in the Age of Post-Modernism, mimeo, Miami University Press, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gott, R. & Duggan, S.: 1995, Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum, Open University Press, Buckingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G.: 1981, ‘Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries’, Educational Communication and Technology Journal 29(2), 75-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S.: 1988, ‘Naturalistic and Rationalistic Enquiry’, in J. P. Keeves (ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook, Pergamon, London, 81-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P.: 1990, Ethnographic Principles in Practice, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M.: 1994, ‘Science and Technology: Partnership or divorce?’, in F. Banks (ed.), Teaching Technology, Routledge, London, 238-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D.: 1993, ‘Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards a More Critical Approach to Practical Work in School Science’, Studies in Science Education 22, 85-142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D.: 1996, ‘Laboratory Work as Scientific Method: Three Decades of Confusion and Distortion’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(2), 115-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D.: 1999, ‘Science Fiction: The Continuing Misrepresentation of Science in the School Curriculum’, Curriculum Studies 6(2), 191-216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. & Bencze, L.: 1998, ‘Becoming Critical about Practical Work: Changing Views and Changing Practice through Action Research’, International Journal of Science Education 20(6), 683-694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. & Reid, D.: 1988, ‘Changing Priorities in Science Education: Part I’, School Science Review 70(250), 101-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. P.: 1994, ‘Gender and the Teaching and Learning of Technology’, in D. Layton (ed.), Innovations in Science and Technology Education, Vol. V, UNESCO, Paris, 133-143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W.: 1995, ‘Central Policy and Teacher Response: Scientific Investigations in the National Curriculum of England and Wales’, International Journal of Science Education 17(4), 471-480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E.: 1997, ‘Towards a Functional Public Understanding of Science’, in R. Levinson & J. Thomas (eds.), Science Today, Routledge, London & New York, 137-150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. K. & Stewart, J.: 1990, ‘Using Philosophy of Science in Curriculum Development: An Example from High School Genetics’, International Journal of Science Education 12, 297-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, G. A.: 1955, The Psychology of Personal Constructs (Vols. 1 & 2), W. W. Norton, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.: 1986, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. & Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D.: 1988, ‘Revaluing the T in STS’, International Journal of Science Education 10(4), 367-378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D.: 1990, Inarticulate Science, School of Education, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D.: 1991, ‘Science Education and Praxis: The Relationship of School Science to Practical Action’, Studies in Science Education 19, 43-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, D.: 1993, Technology's Challenge to Science Education, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, R.: 1990, ‘Open-ended, Problem-solving Investigations-What do We Mean and How Can We Use Them?’, School Science Review 71(256), 63-72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longbottom, J. E. & Butler, P. H.: 1999, ‘Why Teach Science? Setting Rational Goals for Science Education’, Science Education 83(4), 473-492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H.: 1970, Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, R.: 1996, ‘Towards a Science Curriculum for Public Understanding’, School Science Review 77(280), 7-18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munby, H.: 1980, ‘Analyzing Teaching for Intellectual Independence’, in H. Munby, G. Orpwood & T. Russell (eds.), Seeing Curriculum form a New Light: Essays from Science Education. OISE Press, Toronto, 11-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau, R. & Désautels, J.: 1984, Epistemology and the Teaching of Science. A Discussion Paper for the Science Council of Canada (D84/2), Ministry of Supply and Services (Canada), Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, J. D.: 1988, ‘Policy-oriented Research’, in J. P. Keeves (ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook, Pergamon, London, 1988, 139-146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noffke, S. E.: 1995, ‘Action Research and Democratic Schooling: Problematics and Potentials’, in S. E. Noffke & R. B. Stevenson (eds.), Educational Action Research: Becoming Practically Critical, Teacher's College Press, New York, 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Education [OME]: 1987, Science: Grades 9 and 10, Advanced Level, Queen's Printer for Ontario, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Education and Training [OMET]: 1999, Ontario Secondary Schools, Grades 9-12: Program and Diploma Requirements, Toronto, Queen's Printer for Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, R. & Wittrock, M.: 1985, ‘The Generative Learning Model and its Implications for Science Education’, Studies in Science Education 12, 59-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti, E.: 1996, ‘Facilitating Action Research in Science, Technology and Society (STS) Education: An Experience in Reflective Practice’, Educational Action Research 4(3), 307-327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato: c375BC, Republic (Trans.: Desmond Lee, 1955), Penguin, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1958, Personal Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roscoe, H. E.: 1874, ‘Original Research as a Means of Education’, School Science Review 69, 653-661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M.: 1995, Authentic School Science: Knowing and Learning in Open-Inquiry Science Laboratories, Kluwer, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G.M.: 1995, ‘Knowing and Interacting: A Study of Culture, Practices, and Resources in a Grade 8 Open-inquiry Science Classroom Guided by a Cognitive Apprenticeship Metaphor’, Cognition and Instruction 13(1), 73-128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, M. B.: 1978, Teaching Science as Continuous Inquiry: A Basic (2nd Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, J.: 1990, ‘Awakening a Scream of Consciousness: The Critical Group in Action Research’, Theory Into Practice 29(3), 174-178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K.: 1991, ‘Students’ Transition from an Engineering Model to a Science Model of Experimentation’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(9), 859-882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilling, M. D.: 1988, ‘Science, Technology or Science and Technology’, in The Institute of Physics, Physics and Technology: Interactions in Education, Institute of Physics, Bristol, 17-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G. S. (eds.): 1994, STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform, Teachers College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.: 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, J. D. & Bresler L.: 1996, ‘Working in the Interpretive Zone: Conceptualizing Collaboration in Qualitative Research Teams’, Educational Researcher 25(5), 5-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. and West, A.: 1992, ‘Progress through Problems, Not Recipes for Disaster’, School Science Review 73(265), 57-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, A. N.: 1932, The Aims of Education, Williams and Norgate, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, G. H.: 1998, ‘Democracy and the Curriculum’, in L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (eds.), The Curriculum: Problems, Politics, and Possibilities, SUNY Press, New York, 177-198.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bencze, J.L. 'Technoscience' Education: Empowering Citizens Against the Tyranny of School Science. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, 273–298 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011247002142

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011247002142

Keywords

Navigation