Abstract
The status quo for school science and technology is unacceptable. While the former often is required for admission to university engineering, as well as to science programmes, the latter is deemed most appropriate for less able, concrete thinkers. This situation persists, despite the fact school science tends to generate large groups of citizens who are relatively scientifically and technologically illiterate, largely as a result of its preoccupation with identifying and training potential scientists and engineers. This practice is tyrannical. It must be abandoned forthwith. A realistic alternative is a combined technology and science programme – perhaps called 'technoscience' education – that would treat science and technology as equals. Such courses may, as well, be more democratic in the sense that technological problem solving often is more natural to everyday situations that everyone may find useful, not just future scientists or engineers. A framework for combined technology and science courses is described and defended here. Originally developed through collaborative action research amongst practising teachers of science, the approach appears to be feasible, under certain – perhaps ideal – conditions. A number of changes to science and technology education may be necessary for broader implementation, not the least of which is a general retrenchment in expectations for pre-determined learning, along with adjustments to teacher education. Nevertheless, the approach is recommended because of its emphasis on: personalization, inclusion, problematization, explicitness, apprenticeship, authenticity, contextualization and freedom.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
American Association for the Advancement of Science, The [AAAS]: 1967, Science-A Process Approach, AAAS, Washington, DC.
AAAS: 1989, Science for All Americans: A Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology, AAAS, Washington, DC.
Aikenhead, G. S. & Jegede, O. J.: 1999, ‘Cross-Cultural Science Education: A Cognitive Explanation of a Cultural Phenomenon’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(3), 269-287.
Apple, M. W.: 1990, Ideology and Curriculum, Routledge, New York.
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain-Smith, D.: 1985, Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Barak, M. & Pearlman-Avnion, S.: 1999, ‘Who Will Teach an Integrated Program for Science and Technology in Israeli Junior High Schools?: A Case Study’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(2), 239-253.
Barak, M. & Raz, E.: 2000, ‘Hot-Air Balloons Project-Centered Study as a Bridge Between Science and Technology Education’, Science Education 84, 27-42.
Beane, J. A. & Apple, M. W.: 1995, ‘The Case for Democratic Schools’, in M. W. Apple & J. A. Beane (eds.), Democratic Schools, ASCD, Alexandria, VA, 1-25.
Bencze, J. L.: 1995, Towards a More Authentic and Feasible Science Curriculum for Secondary Schools. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.
Bencze, J. L.: 1996, ‘Correlational Studies in School Science: Breaking the Science-experiment-certainty Connection’, School Science Review 78(282), 95-101.
Bencze, J. L.: 2000a, ‘Democratic Constructivist Science Education: Enabling Egalitarian Literacy and Self-actualization’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 32(6), 847-865.
Bencze, J. L.: 2000b, ‘Procedural Apprenticeship in School Science: Constructivist Enabling of Connoisseurship’, Science Education 84(6), 727-739.
Bencze, J. L.: In Press, 'subverting the “Corporatist Manifesto”’, Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.: 1989, ‘Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning’, Educational Researcher 18(1), 32-42.
Bucciarelli, L. L.: 1994, Designing Engineers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Cajas, F.: 1999, ‘Public Understanding of Science: Using Technology to Enhance School Science in Everyday Life’, International Journal of Science Education 21(7), 765-773.
Carr, W. & Kemmis, S.: 1986, Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research, Falmer, Lewes.
Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M.: 1992, ‘Teacher as Curriculum Maker’, in P. W. Jackson (ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum (A Project of AERA), MacMillan, New York, 363-401.
Claxton, G.: 1991, Educating the Inquiring Mind: The Challenge for School Science, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
DeBoer, G. E.: 2000, ‘Scientific Literacy: Another Look at its Historical and Contemporary Meanings and its Relationship to Science Education Reform’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37(6), 582-601.
DfE/WO: 1995, Science in the National Curriculum, HMSO, London.
Durant, J., Evans, G. & Thomas, G.: 1989, ‘The Public Understanding of Science’, Nature 340, 11-14.
Ellul, J.: 1954, The Technological Society (Trans. J. Wilkinson), Vintage, New York, 1964.
Ely, M.: 1991, Doing Qualitative Research: Circles within Circles, Falmer, New York.
Fawcett, B.: 1990, Public Eye: An Investigation into the Disappearance of the World, Grove Weidenfeld, New York.
Fensham, P. J. & Gardner, P. L.: 1994, ‘Technology Education and Science Education: A New Relationship?’, in D. Layton (ed.), Innovations in Science and Technology Education, Vol. V, UNESCO, Paris, 159-170.
Fensham, P. J. & Harlen, W.: 1999, ‘School Science and Public Understanding of Science’, International Journal of Science Education 21(7), 755-763.
Franklin, U.: 1990, The Real World of Technology. In CBC Massey Lectures, CBC Enterprises, Toronto, 1990, 10-33.
Freire, P.: 1970, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Continuum, New York.
Gaines, B. R. & Shaw, M. L. G.: 1993, ‘Knowledge Acquisition Tools based on Personal Construct Psychology’, Knowledge Engineering Review 8(1), 49-85.
Gardner, P. L.: 1999, ‘The Representation of Science-technology Relationships in Canadian Physics Textbooks’, International Journal of Science Education 21(3), 329-347.
Geen, A.: 1991, ‘The Nature of Technology: Some Lessons for the National Curriculum’, Curriculum 12, 26-38.
Giroux, H.: 1989, Border Pedagogy in the Age of Post-Modernism, mimeo, Miami University Press, OH.
Gott, R. & Duggan, S.: 1995, Investigative Work in the Science Curriculum, Open University Press, Buckingham.
Guba, E. G.: 1981, ‘Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries’, Educational Communication and Technology Journal 29(2), 75-91.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S.: 1988, ‘Naturalistic and Rationalistic Enquiry’, in J. P. Keeves (ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook, Pergamon, London, 81-85.
Hammersley, M. & Atkinson, P.: 1990, Ethnographic Principles in Practice, Routledge, London.
Harrison, M.: 1994, ‘Science and Technology: Partnership or divorce?’, in F. Banks (ed.), Teaching Technology, Routledge, London, 238-245.
Hodson, D.: 1993, ‘Re-thinking Old Ways: Towards a More Critical Approach to Practical Work in School Science’, Studies in Science Education 22, 85-142.
Hodson, D.: 1996, ‘Laboratory Work as Scientific Method: Three Decades of Confusion and Distortion’, Journal of Curriculum Studies 28(2), 115-135.
Hodson, D.: 1999, ‘Science Fiction: The Continuing Misrepresentation of Science in the School Curriculum’, Curriculum Studies 6(2), 191-216.
Hodson, D. & Bencze, L.: 1998, ‘Becoming Critical about Practical Work: Changing Views and Changing Practice through Action Research’, International Journal of Science Education 20(6), 683-694.
Hodson, D. & Reid, D.: 1988, ‘Changing Priorities in Science Education: Part I’, School Science Review 70(250), 101-165.
Hynes, H. P.: 1994, ‘Gender and the Teaching and Learning of Technology’, in D. Layton (ed.), Innovations in Science and Technology Education, Vol. V, UNESCO, Paris, 133-143.
Jenkins, E. W.: 1995, ‘Central Policy and Teacher Response: Scientific Investigations in the National Curriculum of England and Wales’, International Journal of Science Education 17(4), 471-480.
Jenkins, E.: 1997, ‘Towards a Functional Public Understanding of Science’, in R. Levinson & J. Thomas (eds.), Science Today, Routledge, London & New York, 137-150.
Johnson, S. K. & Stewart, J.: 1990, ‘Using Philosophy of Science in Curriculum Development: An Example from High School Genetics’, International Journal of Science Education 12, 297-307.
Kelly, G. A.: 1955, The Psychology of Personal Constructs (Vols. 1 & 2), W. W. Norton, New York.
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S.: 1986, Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E.: 1991, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Layton, D.: 1988, ‘Revaluing the T in STS’, International Journal of Science Education 10(4), 367-378.
Layton, D.: 1990, Inarticulate Science, School of Education, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
Layton, D.: 1991, ‘Science Education and Praxis: The Relationship of School Science to Practical Action’, Studies in Science Education 19, 43-79.
Layton, D.: 1993, Technology's Challenge to Science Education, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Lock, R.: 1990, ‘Open-ended, Problem-solving Investigations-What do We Mean and How Can We Use Them?’, School Science Review 71(256), 63-72.
Longbottom, J. E. & Butler, P. H.: 1999, ‘Why Teach Science? Setting Rational Goals for Science Education’, Science Education 83(4), 473-492.
Maslow, A. H.: 1970, Motivation and Personality, Harper & Row, New York.
Millar, R.: 1996, ‘Towards a Science Curriculum for Public Understanding’, School Science Review 77(280), 7-18.
Munby, H.: 1980, ‘Analyzing Teaching for Intellectual Independence’, in H. Munby, G. Orpwood & T. Russell (eds.), Seeing Curriculum form a New Light: Essays from Science Education. OISE Press, Toronto, 11-33.
Nadeau, R. & Désautels, J.: 1984, Epistemology and the Teaching of Science. A Discussion Paper for the Science Council of Canada (D84/2), Ministry of Supply and Services (Canada), Ottawa.
Nisbet, J. D.: 1988, ‘Policy-oriented Research’, in J. P. Keeves (ed.), Educational Research, Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook, Pergamon, London, 1988, 139-146.
Noffke, S. E.: 1995, ‘Action Research and Democratic Schooling: Problematics and Potentials’, in S. E. Noffke & R. B. Stevenson (eds.), Educational Action Research: Becoming Practically Critical, Teacher's College Press, New York, 1-10.
Ontario Ministry of Education [OME]: 1987, Science: Grades 9 and 10, Advanced Level, Queen's Printer for Ontario, Toronto.
Ontario Ministry of Education and Training [OMET]: 1999, Ontario Secondary Schools, Grades 9-12: Program and Diploma Requirements, Toronto, Queen's Printer for Ontario.
Osborne, R. & Wittrock, M.: 1985, ‘The Generative Learning Model and its Implications for Science Education’, Studies in Science Education 12, 59-87.
Pedretti, E.: 1996, ‘Facilitating Action Research in Science, Technology and Society (STS) Education: An Experience in Reflective Practice’, Educational Action Research 4(3), 307-327.
Plato: c375BC, Republic (Trans.: Desmond Lee, 1955), Penguin, New York, 1987.
Polanyi, M.: 1958, Personal Knowledge, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Roscoe, H. E.: 1874, ‘Original Research as a Means of Education’, School Science Review 69, 653-661.
Roth, W.-M.: 1995, Authentic School Science: Knowing and Learning in Open-Inquiry Science Laboratories, Kluwer, Boston.
Roth, W.-M., & Bowen, G.M.: 1995, ‘Knowing and Interacting: A Study of Culture, Practices, and Resources in a Grade 8 Open-inquiry Science Classroom Guided by a Cognitive Apprenticeship Metaphor’, Cognition and Instruction 13(1), 73-128.
Rowe, M. B.: 1978, Teaching Science as Continuous Inquiry: A Basic (2nd Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.
Sanger, J.: 1990, ‘Awakening a Scream of Consciousness: The Critical Group in Action Research’, Theory Into Practice 29(3), 174-178.
Schauble, L., Klopfer, L., & Raghavan, K.: 1991, ‘Students’ Transition from an Engineering Model to a Science Model of Experimentation’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(9), 859-882.
Schilling, M. D.: 1988, ‘Science, Technology or Science and Technology’, in The Institute of Physics, Physics and Technology: Interactions in Education, Institute of Physics, Bristol, 17-22.
Solomon, J. & Aikenhead, G. S. (eds.): 1994, STS Education: International Perspectives on Reform, Teachers College Press, New York.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J.: 1990, Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Wasser, J. D. & Bresler L.: 1996, ‘Working in the Interpretive Zone: Conceptualizing Collaboration in Qualitative Research Teams’, Educational Researcher 25(5), 5-15.
Watts, M. and West, A.: 1992, ‘Progress through Problems, Not Recipes for Disaster’, School Science Review 73(265), 57-63.
Whitehead, A. N.: 1932, The Aims of Education, Williams and Norgate, London.
Wood, G. H.: 1998, ‘Democracy and the Curriculum’, in L. E. Beyer & M. W. Apple (eds.), The Curriculum: Problems, Politics, and Possibilities, SUNY Press, New York, 177-198.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bencze, J.L. 'Technoscience' Education: Empowering Citizens Against the Tyranny of School Science. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, 273–298 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011247002142
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011247002142