Abstract
Field survey data of sorghum landrace populations grown by traditional farmers in four adjacent communities in the Ethiopian Highlands are used to analyze and project the local risk of loss of individual landraces under three scenarios: wild population, traditional farming and agricultural modernization. The risk of loss in the wild population scenario is based on landscape ecology theory which evaluates total population size, spatial distribution and patch occupancy, with high values for each factor and the sum of the factors decreasing the risk. This wild population analysis forms the basis for comparison with the other scenarios. In the traditional farming scenario, the deliberate actions of farmers must be taken into account through the recognition that the farmers favour various traits of the sorghum for specific reasons – yield, taste, storability, etc. – and will balance plant numbers according to quantity and quality requirements. In the agricultural modernization scenario, which includes the introduction of high-yield varieties and the tendency toward monocultures and agricultural chemical use, the traits of the landraces that are most likely to be displaced are hypothesized, as are those of the landraces that are likely to be retained on the basis of cultural or other factors. It is planned to follow up this baseline study with a long-term time-series study of the same communities to assess the validity of our projections.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akimoto M., Shimamoto Y. and Morishima H. 1999. The extinction of genetic resources of Asian wild rice, Oryza rufipogon Griff.: A case study in Thailand. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 46: 419-425.
Brush S.B. 1995. In situ conservation of landraces in centers of crop diversity. Crop Sci. 35: 346-354.
Caughley G. 1994. Directions in conservation biology. J. Animal Ecol. 63: 215-244.
FAO 1998. The State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
Frankel O.H. and Soulé M.E. 1981. Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 327 p.
Hammer K., Knüpffer H., Xhuveli L. and Perrino P. 1996. Estimating genetic erosion in landraces - two case studies. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 43: 329-336.
Hanski I.J. and Gyllenberg M. 1993. Two general metapopulation models and the core-satellite species hypothesis. The American Naturalist 142: 17-41.
Kent M. and Coker P. 1992. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. Bellhaven Press, London, England, 190 p.
Lawton J.H. 1994. Population dynamic principles. Philosophical Transactions on the Royal Society of Land B. 344: 61-68.
Pimm S.L., Jones H.L. and Diamond J. 1988. On the risk of extinction. The American Naturalist 132: 737-785.
Primack R. 1993. Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sinauer Associates Inc., Massachusetts, USA, 564 p.
Teshome A. 1996. Factors maintaining sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] landrace diversity in north Shewa and south Welo regions of Ethiopia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Biology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Teshome A., Baum B.R., Fahrig L., Torrance J.K., Arnasen T.J. and Lambert J.H. 1997. Sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] landrace variation and classification in north Shewa and south Welo, Ethiopia. Euphytica 97: 255-263.
Teshome A., Torrance J.K., Baum B., Fahrig L., Lambert J.H. and Arnasen T.J. 1999a Traditional farmers' knowledge of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor [Poaceae]) landrace storability in Ethiopia. Economic Botany, 53: 69-78.
Teshome A., Fahrig L., Torrance J.K., Lambert J.H., Arnasen T.J. and Baum B.R. 1999b. Maintenance of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor [Poaceae]) landrace diversity by farmers' selection in Ethiopia. Econ. Bot. 53: 79-88.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tunstall, V., Teshome, A. & Torrance, J. Distribution, abundance and risk of loss of sorghum landraces in four communities in North Shewa and South Welo, Ethiopia. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 48, 131–142 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011233217447
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011233217447