Skip to main content
Log in

Rethinking organizational crime and organizational criminology

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Organizational crime and organizational criminology, obviously, are, orshould be about ``organization''. This essay wants to explore what is goingon in contemporary ``organizations''; it wants to think through what iscurrently happening in today's organizations. It will argue thatcontemporary organizational life has arrived in a phase of transition.New forms, and new modalities of organizational morality are taking shape.So is organizational regulation. This, as will hopefully become clear, is ofimportance to organizational criminologists who, inevitably, though oftenimplicitly, have been researching and writing about organizational orbusiness ethics and morality for some time now. This essay suggests analternative way of conceptualizing life and regulation in contemporaryorganizations. It suggests a reading of contemporary organizations as clustersof labyrinthine networks – i.e. the raw materials and again the outcome oflabyrinthine moralities – in which – as Deleuze and Guattari had it – theOutside is always already potentially, though undecidably,Within. To students of organizational regulation, and organizationalcriminologists are amongst them, this essay argues that contemporaryorganizations are gradually turning into highly complex networks (of networks) thatare often inextricably interwoven with surrounding networks. This has aprofound impact on how organizational moralities emerge and develop, onon how these in turn impact on the contents and the orientation oforganizational action. This essay will argue that regulating contemporaryorganizatons is bound to be simultaneously much easier as well as muchmore complex than in a previous, ``bureaucratic'' age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Attali, J., Pathways to Wisdom: The Labyrinth in Culture and Society (Berkeley: North Atlantic Books, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J., “Tightening The Iron Cage. Concertive Control in Self-Managing Terms”, in J. Van Maanen (ed.), Qualitative Studies of Organizations (London: Sage, 1998), pp. 126–158 (originally 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z., Modernity and the Holocaust (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, J., “The Pure Products Go Crazy, ” in ibid., The Predicament of Culture (Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1988), pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M., The Practice of Everyday Life (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. and F. Guattari, Anti-Oedipe (Paris: Editions de Minuit, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., Foucault (London: Athlone, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J., Force de Loi (Paris: Galilée, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R. and R. Cropanzano, Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management (London: Sage, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A., Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy (New York: The Free Press, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P., “Citizenship or Vassalage? Organizational Membership in the Age of Unreason, ” Organization 1997, 4(1), 93–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, C., “Defining the Post-Bureaucratic Type, ” in C. Heckscher and A. Donnellon (eds.), The Post-Bureaucratic Organization (London: Sage, 1994), pp. 14–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackall, R., Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers (New York: Oxford University Press, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, K., Indifferent Boundaries (New York: The Guilford Press, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippens, R., “Into Hybrid Marshlands, ” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law 1999, 1, 59–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippens, R., “Labyrinthine Constitutions”, in Chaohybrids: Five Uneasy Peaces (Lanham: UPA, 2000), pp. 115–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippens, R. and P. Van Calster, “Crime, Accidents, and (Dis)Organization. Rhizome Communications on/of a Food Scare, ” Crime, Law and Social Change 2000, 4, 281–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. and M. Fischer (eds.), Anthropology as Critique (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, R., “Managing by Ambiguity: An Archeology of the Social in the Absence of Management Accounting, ” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1995, 6, 433–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, “Organizations and Citizenship”, Organization 1997, 4(1), 75–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M., Organizational Culture and Identity (London: Sage, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R., “The Challenge of Ethical Behavior in Organizations”, Journal of Business Ethics 1992, 7, 505–513.

    Google Scholar 

  • ten Bos, R., “Business Ethics and Bauman Ethics”, Organization Studies 1997, 6, 997–1014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. et al., Change (New York: Norton, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lippens, R. Rethinking organizational crime and organizational criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change 35, 319–331 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011233022868

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011233022868

Keywords

Navigation