Group Decision and Negotiation

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 355–373 | Cite as

Stakeholder Values and Scientific Modeling in the Neuse River Watershed

  • Mark Borsuk
  • Robert Clemen
  • Lynn Maguire
  • Kenneth Reckhow


In 1998, the North Carolina Legislature mandated a 30% reduction in the nitrogen loading in the Neuse River in an attempt to reduce undesirable environmental conditions in the lower river and estuary. Although sophisticated scientific models of the Neuse estuary exist, there is currently no study directly relating the nitrogen-reduction policy to the concerns of the estuarine system's stakeholders. Much of the difficulty lies in the fact that existing scientific models have biophysical outcome variables, such as dissolved oxygen, that are typically not directly meaningful to the public. In addition, stakeholders have concerns related to economics, modeling, implementation, and fairness that go beyond ecological outcomes. We describe a decision-analytic approach to modeling the Neuse River nutrient-management problem, focusing on linking scientific assessments to stakeholder objectives. The first step in the approach is elicitation and analysis of stakeholder concerns. The second step is construction of a probabilistic model that relates proposed management actions to attributes of interest to stakeholders. We discuss how the model can then be used by local decision makers as a tool for adaptive management of the Neuse River system. This discussion relates adaptive management to the notion of expected value of information and indicates a need for a comprehensive monitoring program to accompany implementation of the model. We conclude by acknowledging that a scientific model cannot appropriately address all the stakeholder concerns elicited, and we discuss how the remaining concerns may otherwise be considered in the policy process.

Bayes net decision analysis predictive modeling probability network risk assessment stakeholder involvement value-focused thinking 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abramson, B., J. Brown, W. Edwards, A. Murphy, and R. L. Winkler. (1996). “Hailfinder: A Bayesian System for Forecasting Severe Weather, ” International Journal of Forecasting 12, 57–71.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, J. L. (1998). “Embracing Uncertainty: The Interface of Bayesian Statistics and CognitivePsychology, ” Conservation Ecology, 2, 2.Google Scholar
  3. Borsuk, M. E., C. A. Stow, R. A. Luettich Jr., H. W. Paerl,and J. L. Pinckney. (1999). “Probabilistic Prediction of Hypoxia in the Neuse River Estuary Using an Empirical Model of Oxygen Dynamics, ” Limnology and Oceanography. Under review.Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, J. D. (1997). “Using a MechanisticEutrophication Model for Water Quality Management of the Neuse River, ” University of North Carolina-Charlotte, draft.Google Scholar
  5. Burkholder, J. M., H. B. Glasgow, and E. J. Noga. (1993). “The Role of a Newly Discovered ToxicDinoflagellate in Finfish and Shellfish Kills in the Neuse and Pamlico Estuaries, ” Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study Report 93-08, NC. Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  6. Burkholder, J. M.,and H. B. Glasgow. (1997). “Pfiesteria Piscicida and Other Pfiesteria-like Dinoflagellates: Behavior, Impacts, and Environmental Controls, ” Limnology and Oceanography 42, 1052–1075.Google Scholar
  7. Burkholder, J. M., M. A. Mallin,and H. B. Glasgow. (1999). “Fish Kills, Bottom-Water Hypoxia, and the Toxic Pfiesteria Complex in the Neuse River and Estuary, ” Marine Ecology Progress Series 179, 301–310.Google Scholar
  8. Clemen, R. T. (1996). Making HardDecisions: An Introduction to Decision Analysis, 2nd edn. Pacific Grove, CA.: Duxbury.Google Scholar
  9. Decisioneering. (1997).Analytica. Denver, CO.: Decisioneering, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Devore, J. L. (1991). Probability and Statistics for Engineering andthe Sciences. Pacific Grove, CA.: Brooks/ Cole.Google Scholar
  11. Glasgow, H. B., J. M. Burkholder, D. E. Schmechel, P.A. Tester, and P. A. Rublee. (1995). “Insidious Effects of a Toxic Estuarine Dinoflagellate on Fish Survival and Human Health, ” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 46, 501–522.Google Scholar
  12. Griffith, D. (1999). “Exaggerating Environmental Health Risk: The Case of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Pfiesteria, ” Human Organization 58, 119–127.Google Scholar
  13. Kahneman, D., P. Slovic, and A. Tversky. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristicsand Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking.Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kuikka, S., and O. Varis. (1997). “Uncertainties of ClimaticChange Impacts in Finnish Watersheds: A Bayesian Network Analysis of Expert Knowledge, ” Boreal Environment Research 2: 109–128.Google Scholar
  16. Lauritzen, S. L., and D. J. Spiegelhalter. (1988). “Local Computations withProbabilities on Graphical Structures and their Application to Expert Systems (with discussion), ” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B50, 157–224.Google Scholar
  17. Lind, E. A. (1995). Social Conflict and Social Justice: Some Lessons fromthe Social Psychology of Justice. Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lind, E. A., and T.R. Tyler. (1988). Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  19. Maloney, K. A., L.A. Maguire, and E. A. Lind. (2000). “Neuse River Estuary Modeling and Monitoring Project Stage 1: Assessment of Stakeholder Interest and Concerns to Inform Long-term Modeling, ” UNC Water Resources Research Institute Report No. 325-G, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  20. Meyer, M., and J. Booker. (1991). Eliciting and Analyzing Expert Judgment: APractical Guide. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  21. Morgan, M.G., and M. Henrion. (1990). Uncertainty.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Oliver, R. M., and J. Q. Smith (eds). (1990). InfluenceDiagrams, Belief Nets, and Decision Analysis. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  23. Paerl, H. W., M. A. Mallin, C. A. Donahue, M. Go, and B. L. Peierls. (1995). “Nitrogen Loading Sources and Eutrophication of the Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina. ” Report No. 291. UNC Water Resources Research Institute, Raleigh, NC.Google Scholar
  24. Paerl, H. W., J.L. Pinckney, J. M. Fear, and B. L. Peierls. (1998). “Ecosystem Responses to Internal and Watershed Organic Matter Loading: Consequences for Hypoxia in the Eutrophying Neuse River Estuary, North Carolina, USA, ” Marine Ecology Progress Series 166, 17–25.Google Scholar
  25. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks ofPlausible Inference. San Mateo,CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  26. Raiffa, H., and R. Schlaifer. (1961). AppliedStatistical Decision Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Reckhow, K. H. (1994). “Water QualitySimulation Modeling and Uncertainty Analysis for Risk Assessment and Decision Making, ” Ecological Modeling 72, 1–20.Google Scholar
  28. Reckhow, K. H. (1999). “Water Quality Prediction and Probability Network Models, ” Canadian Journalof Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 56, 1150–1158.Google Scholar
  29. Stow, C. A., M. E. Borsuk, and D. W. Stanley. (1999). “Nutrient Loading in the Neuse River Watershed: An Opportunity for Adaptive Management, ” Duke University, draft.Google Scholar
  30. Thibaut, J. and L. Walker. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. Thibaut, J., and L. Walker. (1978). “A Theory of Procedure, ” California Law Review 66, 541–566.Google Scholar
  32. USEPA. (1998). Clean Water Action Plan: Restoring and Protecting America's Waters. EPA-840-R-98-001.Google Scholar
  33. Varis, O. (1995). “Belief Networks for Modelling and Assessment of Environmental Change, ” Environmetrics 6, 439–444.Google Scholar
  34. Walters, C. J. (1986). Adaptive Management of Renewable Resources. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Borsuk
    • 1
  • Robert Clemen
    • 1
  • Lynn Maguire
    • 1
  • Kenneth Reckhow
    • 1
  1. 1.The Fuqua School of BusinessDuke UniversityDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations