Abstract
This paper discusses critically the historical bond that exists between contemporary culture and the instrumental definition of technology, according to which technology is a means, a complex of instruments that serve particular human ends. It argues and illustrates that technologies not only serve human ends but also have ends in themselves. Ancient and modern technologies have always had intrinsic ends, they are highly effective achieving those ends and these have ethical importance. As cultural entities with intrinsic ends, technologies are not necessarily congruous with our ends and have generally transformed our ways of life in very unconscious ways.
I propose an ethics of technologies based on the idea that all technologies have a tendency to become prostheses. As part of our being, the ends of technologies become our ends. In the frenzy of instrumentalism and presumed progress, contemporary technologies as prostheses transform the experience of what is far at the expense of what is near. Our ethics opens ways of raising questions with respect to these structural transformations and the communities we might want to envision and consider for humans who may hopefully be capable and willing to choose their technologies in more conscious ways.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Borgmann, A.: 1987, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Borgmann, A.: 1992, Crossing the Postmodern Divide, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Christians, C.G. & Van Hook, J.M.: 1981, Jacques Ellul: Interpretive Essays, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
Ellul, J.: 1964, The Technological Society, J. Wilkinson (trans.), Vintage, Toronto.
Florman, S.: 1975, The Existential Pleasures of Engineering, St. Martin's Press, New York.
Foucault, M.: 1975, Surveiller et Punir, Gallimard, Paris.
Foucault, M.: 1978, A verdae e as formas jurídicas, Pontificia Universidade Católica, Rio de Janeiro.
Heidegger, M.: 1954, ‘The Question Concerning Technology', in W. Lovitt (trans.), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, Harper & Row, New York, 1977, 3–35.
Ihde, D.: 1990, Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth, Indiana University Press, Bloomington.
Illich, I.: 1973, La convivialité, Du Seuil, Paris.
Johnson, D.: 1994, Computer Ethics, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.
Johnson, M.: 1993, Moral Imagination: Moral Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Jonas, H.: 1984, The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Kramer, M.: 1987, ‘The Ruination of the Tomato', in W.B. Thomson (ed.), Controlling Technology: Contemporary Issues, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, 1991, 131–141.
Mitcham, C.: 1994, Thinking Through Technology: The Path Between Engineering and Philosophy, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Noble, D.: 1997, The Religion of Technology, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
Postman, N.: 1993, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, Vintage, New York.
Volti, R.: 1995, ‘Technological Change and Life on the Job', in R. Volti (ed.), Society and Technological Change, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1995, 156–172.
Winner, L.: 1986, The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Winner, L.: 1994, ‘Citizen Virtues in a Technological Order', in A. Feenberg & A. Hannay (eds.), Technology and the Politics of Knowledge, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, 1995, 65–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huyke, H.J. Toward an Ethics of Technologies as Prostheses. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 11, 53–65 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011230120605
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011230120605