Skip to main content
Log in

Applying a variable-shape spatial filter to map relative abundance of manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris)

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presented is a modified spatial filter, called a variable-shape filter, that was used to transform a map of point locations of Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris) to a contoured surface illustrating relative abundance. Rather than having a fixed polygon shape and size as conventional filters do, this method preserves constant filter area but conforms polygon shape to include only the desired land-cover categories–in this study, water. Variable-shape filter polygons are formed by starting with the cell that the point is located in and then adding the nearest contiguous cells of the desired land-cover category to the polygon until the area requirement is reached. Surfaces generated using the variable-shape filter were compared to those created with a conventional, circular, fixed-shape filter. Four filter sizes, based on an analysis of manatee hourly travel rates estimated from satellite and radio telemetry data, were used. Filter sizes, defined in terms of a circle's radius, were 125 m, which was the 25th percentile of the cumulative manatee travel-rate distribution; 325 m, the 50th percentile; 800 m, the 75th percentile; and 3,950 m, the 99th percentile. The fixed-shape and variable-shape filters differed principally in how their results were influenced by land. The variable-shape filter, programmed to maintain constant area, estimated animals to occur farther from shore than the fixed-shape filter did. Fixed-shape filter polygons were occasionally divided by land barriers, such as peninsulas, resulting in calculations of relative abundance estimates that were near the visual sighting in terms of euclidian distance but far in terms of manatee travel. The variable-shape filter was preferable primarily because it was more sensitive to manatee ecology: only cells contiguous to the animal's mapped location were included in the filter calculations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Ackerman, B.B. 1995. Aerial surveys of manatees: a summary and progress report. In Population biology of the Florida manatee. pp. 13–33. Edited by T.J. O'shea, B.B. Ackerman, and H.F. Percival. Information and Technology Report 1. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

  • Ackerman, B.B., Wright, S.D., Bonde, R.K., Odell, D.K. and Banowetz, D.J. 1995. Trends and patterns in mortality of manatees in Florida, 1974–1992. In Population biology of the Florida manatee. pp. 223–258. Edited by T.J. O'shea, B.B. Ackerman and H.F. Percival Information and Technology Report 1. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

  • Anderson, P.K. 1982. Studies of dugongs at Shark Bay, Western Australia I. Analysis of population size, composition, dispersion and habitat use on the basis of aerial survey. Austral. Wildl. Res. 9: 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, P. 1986. Factors affecting aerial surveys of marine fauna, and their relationship to a census of dugongs in the coastal waters of the Northern Territory. Austral. Wildl. Res. 13: 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, J.B. 1967. Recent glacial history of the Alpine area in the Colorado Front Range, U.S.A. I. Establishing a lichen-growth curve. J. Glaciol. 6: 817–832.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, H.W. and Powell, J.A. 1976. Endangered species: the manatee. Florida Naturalist 49: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caughley, G. 1974. Bias in aerial survey. J.Wildl. Manage. 38: 921-933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citrus County, Florida. 1991. Citrus County Manatee protection plan. In Citrus County Comprehensive Plan. pp. 877–939.

  • Cole, J.P. and King, C.A.M. 1968. Quantitative Geography. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, R.D. and Martin, F.B. 1974. A model for quadrat sampling with ‘visibility bias.’ J. Am. Stat. Asso. 69: 345–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fancy, S.G., Pank, L.F., Douglas, D.C., Curby, C.H., Garner, G.W., Amstrup, S.C. and Regelin, W.L. 1988. Satellite telemetry: a new tool for wildlife research and management. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Resource Publication 172. Washington, D.C., USA.

  • Harris, R.B., Fancy, S.G., Douglas, D.C., Garner, G.W., Amstrup, S.C., McCabe, T.R. and Pank, L.F. 1990. Tracking wildlife by satellite: current systems and performance. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Technical Report 30. Washington, D.C., USA.

  • Hartman, D.S. 1974. Distribution, status, and conservation of the manatee in the United States. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Final Report. Contract 14-16-0008-748.

  • Hartman, D.S. 1979. Ecology and Behavior of the Manatee Trichechus manatus in Florida. Special Publication No. 5, The American Society of Mammalogists.

  • Kinnaird, M.F. 1983. Aerial census of manatees and boats over the lower St. Johns River and the Intracoastal Waterway in northeastern Florida. Site-specific reduction of manatee boat/barge mortality research report No. 2. Prepared by the Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Gainesville, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochman, H.I., Rathbun, G.B. and Powell, J.A. 1985. Temporal and spatial distribution of manatees in Kings Bay, Crystal River, Florida. J. Wildl. Manage. 49: 921–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, A.B., Caffin J.E. and Kochman, H.I. 1982. Aerial surveys for manatees and dolphins in western peninsular Florida. Fish. Bull. 80: 621–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marine Mammal Commission. 1988. Preliminary assessment of habitat protection needs for West Indian manatees on the east coast of Florida and Georgia. 1988. Report of the Marine Mammal Commission in consultation with its committee of scientific advisors on marine mammals.

  • Marsh, H. and Sinclair, D.F. 1989. Correcting for visibility bias in strip transect aerial surveys of aquatic fauna. J. Wildl. Manage. 53: 1017–1024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M.A. 1990. Kriging: A method of interpolation for geographical information systems. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Syst. 4: 313–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'shea, T.J., Beck, C.A., Bonde, R.K., Kochman, H.I. and Odell, D.K. 1985. An analysis of manatee mortality patterns in Florida, 1976–1981. J. Wildl. Manage. 49: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, J.M. and Mulholland, R. 1983. Analysis of manatee aerial surveys: A compilation and preliminary analysis of winter aerial surveys conducted in Florida between 1977 and 1982. Manatee Population Research Report No. 2. Technical Report No. 8–2. Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 119 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, J.M., Summers, R.C. and Barnes, L.B. 1983. Correction factors for observability of manatees during aerial surveys. Manatee Population Research, Report No. 3. Florida Cooperative Fish andWildlife Research Unit, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Gainesville, FL, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, J.M., Summers, R.C. and Barnes, L.B. 1985. Variation of visibility bias during aerial surveys of manatees. J. Wildl. Manage. 49: 347–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, J.M. and Wetterqvist, O.F. 1986. Evaluation of manatee habitat systems on the northwestern Florida coast. Coastal Zone Manage. J. 14: 279–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Provancha, J.A. and Provancha, M.J. 1988. Long-term trends in abundance and distribution of manatees (Trichechus manatus) in the northern Banana River, Brevard County, Florida. Marine Mammal Sci. 4: 323–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathbun, G.B., Reid, J.P. and Carowan, G. 1990. Distribution and movement patterns of manatees (Trichechus manatus) in northwestern peninsular Florida. Florida Marine Research Institute Publication 48. St. Petersburg, FL, USA.

  • Reid, J.P., Bonde, R.K. and O'shea, T.J. 1995. Reproduction and mortality of radio-tagged and recognizable manatees on the Atlantic coast of Florida. In Population biology of the Florida manatee pp. 171–191. Edited by T.J. O'shea, B.B. Ackerman and H.F. Percival Information and Technology Report 1. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

  • Reynolds, J.E., III. 1988. Distribution and abundance of the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus) around selected Florida power plants following winter cold fronts: 1987–1988. Final Report to Florida Power and Light Company, Juno Beach, FL,USA. Order No. B87806-00039.

  • Reynolds, J.E., III, Ackerman, B.B., Beeler, I.E., Weigle, B.L. and Houhoulis, P.F. 1991. Assessment and management of manatees (Trichechus manatus) in Tampa Bay. In Proceedings of the Second Tampa Bay Area Science and Information Symposium. pp. 23–27. Edited by S.F. Treat and P.A. Clark. February 27–March 1, 1991, Tampa, FL, USA.

  • Samuel, M.D. and Pollock, K.H. 1981. Correction of visibility bias in aerial surveys where animals occur in groups. J. Wildl. Manage. 45: 993–997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S.H. 1981. Abundance, distribution and use of power plant effluents by manatees (Trichechus manatus) in Brevard County, Florida. Report to Florida Power and Light Co., Miami. National Technical Information Service PB81-147019.

  • Steinhorst, R.K. and Samuel, M.D. 1989. Sightability adjustment methods for aerial surveys of wildlife populations. Biometrics 45: 415–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Fish and Wildlife Service. 1995. Florida Manatee Recovery Plan Second Revision. United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L.I. and Weigle, B.L. 1993. To save a species: GIS for manatee research and management. GIS World 6: 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, B.L. and Haddad, K.D. 1990. Applications of the Florida Department of Natural Resources' marine resources geographic information system to manatee biology and management. In Report of the workshop on geographic information systems as an aid to managing habitat for West Indian manatees in Florida and Georgia. pp. 23–27. Edited by J.E., III, Reynolds and K.D. Haddad. Florida Marine Research Publications No. 49, Florida Department of Natural Resources, Florida Marine Research Institute.

  • Wolfe, M.L. and Kimball, J.F., 1989. Comparison of bison population estimates with a total count. J. Wildl. Manage. 53: 593–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S.D., Ackerman, B.B., Bonde, R.K., Beck, C.A. and Banowetz, D.J. 1995. Analysis of watercraft-related mortality of manatees in Florida 1979–1991. In Population biology of the Florida manatee. pp. 259–268. Edited by T.J. O'shea, B.B. Ackerman and H.F. Percival. Information and Technology Report 1. United States Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flamm, R.O., Ward, L.I. & Weigle, B.L. Applying a variable-shape spatial filter to map relative abundance of manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Landscape Ecology 16, 279–288 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011182302522

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011182302522

Navigation