Skip to main content
Log in

Telecommunications Investment and Traffic in Developing Countries: The Effects of International Settlement Rate Reforms

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 1997 the FCC ordered sharp decreases in international settlement rates (bilaterally negotiated telecommunication rates) between the U.S. and other countries. Developing countries, which received about $35 billion in net settlement payments from U.S. carriers between 1985 and 1998, claim that payments finance telecom investment and that reduced rates, and therefore payments, will harm investment. Using a panel dataset of 179 countries from 1985–1998, I find settlement rates negatively correlated with international telecom traffic, suggesting that reduced rates will stimulate traffic. I also find no evidence that payments finance investment as measured by telephone penetration and telecommunications equipment imports.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braga, C., E. Forestier, C. Kenny, and P. Smith. 1998. Developing Countries and the Telecommunications Accounting Rate Regime: A Role for the World Bank. World Bank Presentation. (Available online at www.worldbank.org/html/fpd/telecoms/pdf/account.pdf.) Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braga, C., E. Forestier, and P. Stern. 1999. Developing Countries and Accounting Rates Reform—A Technological and Regulatory El Niño? Public Policy for the Private Sector. Note No. 172. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M., and L. Waverman. 1998. “The Future of International Settlements.” Telecommunications Policy 22(11): 883–898.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, H. W., K. L. Yun, I. J. Kim, and B. H. Ahn. 1999. “On the Economics of Callback Services.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 15: 165–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ergas, H., and P. Paterson. 1991. “International Telecommunications Settlement Arrangements: An Unsustainable Inheritance?” Telecommunications Policy 15(1): 29–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieden, R. 1996. International Telecommunications Handbook. Boston: Artech House, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Telecommunications Union (ITU). 1997. Telecommunications Regulatory Survey 1996/1997.

  • International Telecommunications Union (ITU). 1998, General Trends in Telecommunications Reform.

  • International Telecommunications Union (ITU). 2000. Telecommunications Indicator Handbook.

  • Kelly, T. 1997. “Is There Life for the Accounting Rate System After 1998?” Paper prepared for Telegeography 1998.

  • Khalidson, K. 2000. “International Accounting Rates: Global Trends and the impact on Africa.” Paper presented at the Africa Telecom Summit 2000, Accra, Ghana.

  • Madden, G., and S. Savage. 1998. “Market Structure, Competition and Pricing in the United States International Telephone Services Markets.” Curtin University of Technology Working Paper Series #98:06.

  • Maleug, D., and M. Schwartz. 1998. “Where Have All the Minutes Gone? Asymmetric Telecom Liberalization, Carrier Alliances, and Gaming of International Settlements.” Georgetown University Department of Economics Working Paper #98–08.

  • Manenti, F. M. 2001. “On the Impact of Call-Back Competition on International Telephony.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 20(1).

  • Melody, W. H. 2000. “Telecom Myths: The International Revenue Settlements Subsidy.” Telecommunications Policy 24(1).

  • Petrazzini, B., and T. Clark. 1996. “Costs and Benefits of Telecommunications Liberalization in Developing Countries.” Mimeo.

  • Ros, A. 1999. “Does Ownership or Competition Matter? The Effects of Telecommunications Reform on Network Expansion and Efficiency.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 5(1).

  • Telecommunications Reports 1997. 16(7): 18–22.

  • Rüller, L. H. and Waverman, L., 2000. “Telecommunications Infrastructure and Economic Development: A Simultaneous Approach.” CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2399. London: Center for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Federal Communications Commission. 2000. Net settlement payments, www.fcc.gov/ib/td/pf/nsp.xls

  • US Federal Communications Commission. 1997. Report and Order in the Matter of International Settlement Rates. FCC 97–280, IB Docket No. 96–261.

  • US Federal Communications Commission. 1999a. Reform of International Settlements Policy. IB Docket No. 98–148.

  • US Federal Communications Commission. 1999b. List of International Routes that Satisfy Criteria For Relief from the International Settlements Policy and Associated Filing Requirements. Public Notice, DA 99–1510.

  • Stern, P. A., and T. Kelly. 1997. “Liberalization and Reform of International Telecommunications Settlement Arrangements.” International Telecommunications Union. (Available online from www.itu.int/intset/ITUpap/brasilia.pdf).

  • Wallsten, S. 2001. “An Econometric Analysis of Telecom Competition, Privatization, and Regulation in Africa and Latin America.” Journal of Industrial Economics 49(1): 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, J. 1999. World Telecommunications Economics. London: Institution of Electrical Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. 1999. “International Telecommunications, Settlement Rates and the FCC.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 15: 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, The, 1995. Bureaucrats in Business: The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wallsten, S.J. Telecommunications Investment and Traffic in Developing Countries: The Effects of International Settlement Rate Reforms. Journal of Regulatory Economics 20, 307–323 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011171110899

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011171110899

Keywords

Navigation