Abstract
This study considers the alternatives available for transferring agricultural property on the urban periphery. The model examines the conditions under which market participants sell or exchange farmland. Contrary to popular opinion, we find that simultaneous exchanges are still feasible in the presence of delayed exchanges, particularly when the relinquished property is very large. The model also explains the observed phenomenon that the sellers of agricultural property get replacement properties of lesser market value in exchanges.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Auster, R. (1998). “Tax Implications of Taxable Sales vs. Tax-Free Exchanges,” Real Estate Review 28, 49–53.
Bachner, R. (1996). “Selecting the Replacement Property in a Deferred Exchange,” Real Estate Review 26, 56–60.
Clevenger, N. and C. Wymore. (1994). “Tax-Free Trades: Simple Concept, Sticky Rules,” National Public Accountant 39, 17–19.
Colwell, P., and A. Yavas. (1994). “The Demand for Agricultural Land and Strategic Bidding in Auctions,” Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 8, 137–149.
Foster, Edward I. (1995). “Changing Concepts of Like-Kind Exchanges,” Real Estate Review 24, 85–88.
Hamill, J. R. (1997). “Avoiding Traps in Deferred Like-Kind Exchanges,” Tax Advisor 28, 716–723.
Messina, F., and D. Harris. (1997). “Like Kind Exchanges for Real Property Investors,” Journal of Property Management 62, 74–77.
Yavas, A. (1992). “A Simple Search and Bargaining Model of Real Estate Markets,” Real Estate Economics 20, 533–548.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Colwell, P.F., Dehring, C.A. A Model of “Tax-Free” Exchange of Farmland. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics 23, 95–112 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011168824765
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011168824765