Skip to main content
Log in

Urofsky v. Gilmore: The Fourth Circuit Takes a Narrow View of Academic Freedom

  • Published:
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • American Association of University Professors. (1990). 1940 Statement of Principles on Academic Freedom and Tenure. AAUP Policy Documents and Reports. Washington, DC: Author.

  • Bishop v. Aronov, 926 F.2d 1066 (11th Cir. 1991).

  • Byrne, J. Peter. (2001, January 5). Constitutional Academic Freedom in Scholarship and in Court. The Chronicle of Higher Education. p. B13.

  • Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138 (1983).

  • Dambrot v. Central Michigan University, 55 F.3d 1177 (6th Cir. 1995).

  • Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589 (1967).

  • Martin v. Parrish, 805 F.2d 583 (5th Cir. 1986).

  • Pickering v. Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 (1968).

  • Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957).

  • Urofsky v. Gilmore, 216 F.3d 401 (4th Cir. 2000).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kinser, K., Fossey, R. Urofsky v. Gilmore: The Fourth Circuit Takes a Narrow View of Academic Freedom. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15, 51–57 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011156302685

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011156302685

Keywords

Navigation