Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to analyze strategic behavior of vertically integrated firms when there is downstream entry, taking into account the balance between “competition in the market” and “competition for the market”. This analysis can serve to explain diverse distributional structures, including the coexistence of vertically integrated firms and independent retailers. And it shows that the relative efficiency of downstream entrants and the level of competition among incumbents are two major factors in determining equilibrium configuration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beard, T. R., D. L. Kaserman, and J. W. Mayo. 1998. “The Role of Resale Entry in Promoting Local Exchange Competition.” Telecommunications Policy 22: 315–326.
Dixit, A. 1983. “Vertical Integration in a Monopolistically Competitive Industry.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 1: 63–78.
Economides, N. 1998. “The Incentive for Non-price Discrimination by an Input Monopolist.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 16: 271–284.
Greenhut, M., and H. Ohta. 1979. “Vertical Integration of Successive Oligopolist.” American Economic Review 69: 137–147.
Kaserman, D. L., and J. W. Mayo. 1997. “An Efficient Avoided Cost Pricing Rule for Resale of Local Exchange Telephone Services.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 11: 91–107.
Klemperer, P. 1988. “Welfare Effects of Entry into Markets with Consumer Switching Costs.” Journal of Industrial Economics 37: 159–165.
Mandy, D. M. 2000. “Killing the Goose That May Have Laid the Golden Egg: Only the Data Know Whether Sabotage Pays.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17(2): 157–172.
Nachbar, J. H., Bruce C. Petersen, and Inhak Hwang. 1998. “Sunk Cost, Accommodation, and the Welfare Effects of Entry.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 46(3): 317–332.
Perry, M. K., and R. H. Groff. 1985. “Resale Price Maintenance and Forward Integration into a Monopolistically Competitive Industry.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 1293–1311.
Reiffen, D. 1998. “A Regulated Firm's Incentive to Discriminate: A Reevaluation and Extension of Weisman's Result.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 14: 79–86.
Sibley, D. S., and D. L. Weisman. 1998. “Raising Rival's Costs: The Entry of an Upstream Monopolist into Downstream Markets.” Information Economics and Policy 10: 451–470.
Spengler, J. 1950. “Vertical Integration and Anti-trust Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 58: 347–352.
Szidarovszky, F., and S. Yakowitz. 1977. “A New Proof of the Existence and Uniqueness of the Cournot Equilibrium.” International Economic Review 18(3): 787–789.
Weisman, D. L. 1995. “Regulation and Vertically Integrated Firm: The Case of RBOC Entry into Interlata Long Distance.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 8: 249–266.
Weisman, D. L. 1998. “The Incentive to Discriminate by a Vertically-Integrated Regulated Firm: A Reply.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 14: 87–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Song, JD., Kim, JC. Strategic Reaction of Vertically Integrated Firms to Downstream Entry: Deterrence or Accommodation. Journal of Regulatory Economics 19, 183–199 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011153408097
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011153408097