Skip to main content
Log in

Strategic Reaction of Vertically Integrated Firms to Downstream Entry: Deterrence or Accommodation

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to analyze strategic behavior of vertically integrated firms when there is downstream entry, taking into account the balance between “competition in the market” and “competition for the market”. This analysis can serve to explain diverse distributional structures, including the coexistence of vertically integrated firms and independent retailers. And it shows that the relative efficiency of downstream entrants and the level of competition among incumbents are two major factors in determining equilibrium configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beard, T. R., D. L. Kaserman, and J. W. Mayo. 1998. “The Role of Resale Entry in Promoting Local Exchange Competition.” Telecommunications Policy 22: 315–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. 1983. “Vertical Integration in a Monopolistically Competitive Industry.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 1: 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economides, N. 1998. “The Incentive for Non-price Discrimination by an Input Monopolist.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 16: 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhut, M., and H. Ohta. 1979. “Vertical Integration of Successive Oligopolist.” American Economic Review 69: 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaserman, D. L., and J. W. Mayo. 1997. “An Efficient Avoided Cost Pricing Rule for Resale of Local Exchange Telephone Services.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 11: 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemperer, P. 1988. “Welfare Effects of Entry into Markets with Consumer Switching Costs.” Journal of Industrial Economics 37: 159–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandy, D. M. 2000. “Killing the Goose That May Have Laid the Golden Egg: Only the Data Know Whether Sabotage Pays.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 17(2): 157–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nachbar, J. H., Bruce C. Petersen, and Inhak Hwang. 1998. “Sunk Cost, Accommodation, and the Welfare Effects of Entry.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 46(3): 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. K., and R. H. Groff. 1985. “Resale Price Maintenance and Forward Integration into a Monopolistically Competitive Industry.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 1293–1311.

  • Reiffen, D. 1998. “A Regulated Firm's Incentive to Discriminate: A Reevaluation and Extension of Weisman's Result.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 14: 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, D. S., and D. L. Weisman. 1998. “Raising Rival's Costs: The Entry of an Upstream Monopolist into Downstream Markets.” Information Economics and Policy 10: 451–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spengler, J. 1950. “Vertical Integration and Anti-trust Policy.” Journal of Political Economy 58: 347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szidarovszky, F., and S. Yakowitz. 1977. “A New Proof of the Existence and Uniqueness of the Cournot Equilibrium.” International Economic Review 18(3): 787–789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, D. L. 1995. “Regulation and Vertically Integrated Firm: The Case of RBOC Entry into Interlata Long Distance.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 8: 249–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, D. L. 1998. “The Incentive to Discriminate by a Vertically-Integrated Regulated Firm: A Reply.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 14: 87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, JD., Kim, JC. Strategic Reaction of Vertically Integrated Firms to Downstream Entry: Deterrence or Accommodation. Journal of Regulatory Economics 19, 183–199 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011153408097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011153408097

Keywords

Navigation