Skip to main content
Log in

Creating a Public Good to Fight Monopolization: The Formation of Broadcast Music, Inc.

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Entry by vertical integration to defeatmonopolization has played an important role in severalantitrust cases. Yet the source of financing for suchentry is unclear, given that the entrant represents apublic good to the vertically related firms. Whilethere are a number of theoretical and experimentalstudies on the private supply of a public good, thereis little empirical estimation on this topic. Thispaper examis business contributions to the creation ofBroadcast Music, Inc. (BMI) in 1940. BMI was createdby broadcasters specifically to fight monopolization,and represented investment in a pure public good. This study finds that several factors led tocontributions to create BMI. In particular, networkaffiliation increased the probability that a stationwould join BMI. There is also evidence stations inless competitive markets were more likely to join,indicating that the rents from the creation of BMIwere less likely to be competed away in suchmarkets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreoni, James (1988) ‘Privately Provided Goods in a Large Economy: The Limits of Altruism’, Journal of Public Economics, 35, 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, James (1995) ‘Cooperation in Public-Goods Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?’, American Economic Review, 85, 891–904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, James, and Martin C. McGuire (1993) ‘Identifying the Free Riders: A Simple Algorithm for Determining Who Will Contribute to a Public Good’, Journal of Public Economics, 51, 447–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, Peter, Gary A. Giglioot, and James A. Polito (1993) ‘Free Riding with Discrete and Continuous Public Goods: Some Empirical Evidence’, Public Choice, 77, 293–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadcast Music, Inc. (1990) The Explosion of American Music. New York: The Country Music Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cirace, John (1978) ‘CBS v. ASCAP: An Economic Analysis of a Political Problem’, Fordham Law Review, 47, 277–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, Marcus (1941) ‘Music, Radio Broadcasters, and the Sherman Act’, Georgetown Law Review, 29, 407–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo, and S. Gilson (1994) ‘The Collapse of First Executive Corporation: Junk Bonds, Adverse Publicity, and the “Run on the Bank” Phenomena’, Journal of Financial Economics, 36, 287–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, Robert, and Richard J. Sexton (1994) ‘Strategic Buyers and Exclusionary Contracts (1994)’, American Economic Review, 84, 566–584.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, Bruce Robert (1989) ‘An Accurate Measure of the Crowding-Out Effect, Income Effect, and Price Effect for Charitable Contributions’, Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1197–1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsbury, Paul (1990) The Explosion of American Music, 1940–1990. New York: BMI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleit, Andrew N. (2000) ‘ASCAP vs. BMI (vs. CBS): Modeling Competition between Performance Rights Organizations’, Economic Inquiry, 38, 579–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleit, Andrew N., and Malcolm B. Coate (1993) ‘Are Judges Leading Economic Theory: Sunk Costs, the Threat of Entry, and the Competitive Process’, Southern Economic Journal, 60, 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichty, Lawrence W., and Malachi C. Topping (1975) American Broadcasting. New York: Hastings House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopatka, John E., and Andrew N. Kleit (1995) ‘The Mystery of Lorain Journal and the Quest for Foreclosure’, Texas Law Review, 73, 1255–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, James C., and Todd Sandler (1997) ‘The Voluntary Provision of a Pure Public Good: The Case of Reduced CFC Emissions and the Montreal Protocol’, Journal of Public Economics, 63, 331–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, Bruce M. (1973) ‘Newspaper and Televison Station Joint Ownership’, Antitrust Bulletin, 18, 787–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondeau, Daniel, William D. Schulze, and Gregory L Poe (1999) ‘Voluntary Revelation of the Demand for Public Goods Using a Provision Point Mechanism’, Journal of Public Economics, 72, 455–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffman, David T., and Pablo, T. Spiller (1992), ‘“Buyers” Strategies, Entry Barriers and Competition’, Economic Inquiry, 30, 418–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sexton, Richard J., and Terri A. Sexton (1987) ‘Cooperatives as Entrants’, Rand Journal of Economics, 18, 581–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Vincent H., Michael R. Kehoe, and Mary E. Cremer (1995) ‘The Private Provision of Public Goods: Altruism and Voluntary Giving’, Journal of Public Economics, 58, 107–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanadis, Christodoulos (1998) ‘Selective Contracts, Foreclosure, and the Chicago View’, Journal of Law and Economics, 41, 429–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, Siew Hong (1997) ‘Information Disclosure and Voluntary Contributions to Public Goods’, Rand Journal of Economics, 28, 385–406.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleit, A.N. Creating a Public Good to Fight Monopolization: The Formation of Broadcast Music, Inc.. Review of Industrial Organization 19, 243–256 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011146910605

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011146910605

Navigation