We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Unconditional Self-Acceptance and Responses to Negative Feedback | SpringerLink

Unconditional Self-Acceptance and Responses to Negative Feedback

Abstract

Rational-emotive behavior therapy (REBT; Ellis, 1995) contends that esteeming oneself—favorably or unfavorably—is illogical (implying an objective basis for evaluating global worth) and counterproductive (making one prone to depression in the wake of setbacks, anxiety otherwise). A healthier outlook requires unconditional self-acceptance (USA). We evaluated predictions regarding USA in a nonclinical university student sample. Consistent with REBT, participants scoring high on a USA questionnaire, controlling for self-esteem level, reported being low in proneness to depression and in self-esteem lability. They also were more objective in evaluating their performance on a public speaking task and were less apt to denigrate people who provided negative evaluations of their speeches. Predictions regarding impression management, willingness to try another speech, and mood or state self-esteem reactivity to feedback were not supported. Discussion focused on implications for research on USA as well as applied implications for therapy or prevention programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alloy, L. B., Hartlage, S., Metalsky, G. I., & Abramson, L. Y. (1987). The Depression Proneness Inventory: A brief, face-valid scale of vulnerability to depressive reactions in response to stress. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University.

  3. Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden J.M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chamberlain, J. M., & Haaga, D. A. F. (2001). Unconditional self-acceptance and psychological health. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 19, 163–176.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dykman, B. (1998). Integrating cognitive and motivational factors in depression: Initial tests of a goal-orientation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 139–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ellis, A. (1973). Humanistic psychotherapy: The rational-emotive approach. New York: Julian.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis, A. (1976). RET abolishes most of the human ego. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13, 343–348.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis, A. (1977). Psychotherapy and the value of a human being. In A. Ellis & R. Grieger (Eds.), Handbook of rational-emotive therapy (pp. 99–112). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis, A., & Bernard, M. E. (1985). What is rational-emotive therapy (RET)? In A. Ellis and M.E. Bernard (Eds.), Clinical applications of rational emotive therapy (pp. 1–30). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis, A., & Dryden, W. (1997). The practice of rational emotive behavior therapy (2nd Ed.). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ellis, A., & Harper, R. A. (1997). A guide to rational living (3rd Ed.). North Hollywood, CA: Wilshire.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Engels, G. I., Garnefski, N., & Diekstra, R. F. W. (1993). Efficacy of rationalemotive therapy; A quantitative analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 1083–1090.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenier, K. D., Kernis, M. H., McNamara, C. W., Waschull, S. B., Berry, A. J., Herlocker, C. E., & Abend, T. A. (1999). Individual differences in reactivity to daily events: Examining the roles of stability and level of selfesteem. Journal of Personality, 67, 185–208.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Heatherton, T. F., & Polivy, J. (1991). Development and validation of a scale for measuring state self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 895–910.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kernis, M. H., Cornell, D. P., Sun, C., Berry, A., & Harlow, T. (1993). There's more to self-esteem than whether it is high or low: The importance of stability of self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1190–1204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kernis, M. H., Grannemann, B. D., & Barclay, L. C. (1992). Stability of selfesteem: Assessment, correlates, and excuse making. Journal of Personality, 60, 621–644.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson, J. P., & Shaver, P. R. (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sackeim, H. A., & Gur, R. C. (1978). Self-deception, self-confrontation, and consciousness. In G. E. Schwartz and D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research (Vol. 2, pp. 139–197). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schlenker, B. R., Soraci, S., & McCarthy, B. (1976). Self-esteem and group performance as determinants of egocentric perceptions in cooperative groups. Human Relations, 29, 1163–1176.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tarlow, E. M., & Haaga, D. A. F. (1996). Negative self-concept: Specificity todepressive symptoms and relation to positive and negative affectivity.Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 120–127.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chamberlain, J.M., Haaga, D.A.F. Unconditional Self-Acceptance and Responses to Negative Feedback. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy 19, 177–189 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011141500670

Download citation

  • unconditional self-acceptance
  • self-esteem
  • reactions to feedback
  • objectivity