Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a Technology Readiness Assessment Measure: The Cloverleaf Model of Technology Transfer

  • Published:
The Journal of Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Successful technology transfer begins with the identification of appropriate candidate technologies for transfer. Technology transfer managers have few reliable tools to guide the process of determining when and which technologies are likely to be successful in the commercialization process. This paper describes a multi-stage process which incorporated ideas from the literature, materials in use, pretesting of a model, and the collective wisdom of practitioners to devise a technology transfer readiness tool, dubbed the “Cloverleaf Model” Tool for Technology Transfer Assessment, because of its identification of the four requirements for success. The tool has been customized for different environments. It can be used over time to compare technologies and adapted to the unique situation of users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaron, E., 1988, 'Tapping into University Technology', High Technology Business, December, pp.26–28.

  • Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM), 1994, 'Checklists for a Quick Evaluation of New Technologies', Western Regional Conference Proceedings.

  • Bjurstrom, E.E. and B.J. Smelser, 1988, 'Commercializing Biotechnology Processes', Chemical Engineering, January 18, pp.81–84.

  • Calantone, R.J. and C.A. di Benedetto, 1988, 'An Integrative Model of the New Product Development Process: An Empirical Evaluation', Journal of Product Innovation Management 5, 201–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J.M., R.D. O'Keefe and A.A. Chilenskas, 1980, 'Technology Transfer from Government Laboratories to Industrial Markets', Industrial Marketing Management 9, 63–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, J., 1986, 'Bring on the Wild and Crazy People', Forbes 137, 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R.G., 1993, Winning at NewProducts, 2nd ed., Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, D.D., 1990, 'University/Industry Research Collaborations: An Analysis of Interorganizational Relationships', R&D Management 20 (2), 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorf, R.C. and K.K.F. Worthington., 1987, 'Models for Commercialization of Technology from Universities and Research Laboratories', Journal of Technology Transfer 12 (1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, D., 1998, 'Keynote Luncheon Presentation', in Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating Technology for Commercial Exploitation, Ottawa: Federal Partners for Technology Transfer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entingh, D.J., C.J. Andrews, D.C. Kenkeremath, J.E. Mock and F.T. Janis, 1987, Guidebook for Technology Transfer Managers.

  • Galbraith, J.R., 1982, 'Designing the Innovating Organization', Organizational Dynamics 10, 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groth, J.C., 1994/95, 'Critical Factors in Exploiting Technologies', Management-Decision, pp.19–32.

  • Hagedoorn, J., 1993, 'Understanding the Rationale of Strategic Technology Partnering: Interorganizational Modes of Cooperation and Sectoral Differences', Strategic Management Journal 14, 371–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauber, E., 1996, 'Industry and the University', Nature Biotechnology 14, 441–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honomichi, J., 1993, 'PR about Research That Pays Can Also Pay Off for Researchers', Marketing News 27, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, J.A. and J.W. Creighton, 1977, 'The Technology Transfer Process: Concepts, Framework and Methodology', Journal of Technology Transfer 1 (2), 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, L.J., 1992, 'NIH Scientists Develop a Range of New Technologies for Tech Transfer', General Engineering News 12, 7, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, R., 1998, 'The ProGrid System: A Customized Expert System for Valuation of Intellectual Capital', in Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating Technology for Commercial Exploitation, Ottawa: Federal Partners for Technology Transfer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, W.P.and B. Dooley, 1995, 'Demonstration Projects for Diffusion of Multifaceted Technology: Characterization and Strategy', International Journal of Technology Management, 10 (2/3), 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. and D.G. Marquis, 1969, 'Successful Industrial Innovations', NSF69-17, National Science Foundation.

  • Pandia, R.M., 1989, 'Transfer of Technology: Techniques for Chemical and Pharmaceutical Projects', Project Management Journal XX (3), 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelman, A., 1998, 'Technology Evaluation: Challenges Facing Research Managers', in Proceedings of the Workshop on Evaluating Technology for Commercial Exploitation, Ottawa: Federal Partners for Technology Transfer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, E.B. and O. Hauptman, 1986, 'The process of Technology Transfer to the New Biomedical and Pharmaceutical Firm', Research Policy 15, 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, B.F. and R.O. Weijo, 1988, 'Using Market Research to Convert Federal Technology into Marketable Products', Journal of Technology Transfer 13, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samson, K.J. and M.A. Gurdon, 1993, 'University Scientists as Entrepreneurs: A Special Case of Technology Transfer and High-Tech Venturing', Technovation 13 (2), 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souder, W.E. and V.P admanabhan, 1989, 'Transferring New Technologies from R&D to Manufacturing', Research Technology Management 32 (Sept.- Oct.), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Den Kroonenberg, H.H., 1989, 'Getting a Quicker Pay-Off from R and D', Long Range Planning 22, 51–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, W.M., 1990, Business Aspects of Technology Transfer, Park Ridge, NJ: Noyes Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, L., 1991, 'Inventions for Sale', Technology Review, 94, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, G.R. and M.B.W. Graham, 1978, 'How to Spot a Technological Winner', Harvard Business Review 56, 146–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heslop, L.A., McGregor, E. & Griffith, M. Development of a Technology Readiness Assessment Measure: The Cloverleaf Model of Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 369–384 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011139021356

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011139021356

Keywords

Navigation