Skip to main content
Log in

Intravenous Amiodarone Decreases the Duration of Atrial Fibrillation Associated with Acute Myocardial Infarction

  • Published:
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a fairly common complication of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The aim of this study was to examine the safety and efficacy of intravenous amiodarone in converting AF associated with AMI.

Methods: Seventy patients with AMI complicated with AF were prospectively divided into 3 groups: a) In group D (n = 26), 0.75 mg digoxin was administered intravenously and thereafter as needed, b) In group AM (n = 16), 300 mg of amiodarone was infused over 2 hours followed by 44 mg/hour for up to 60 hours or until sinus rhythm was restored, c) In group D + AM (n = 28), 0.75 mg of digoxin was administered (as in group D) for the initial 2 hours followed by amiodarone infusion as in group AM.

Results: Sinus rhythm was restored: a) by the end of the 2nd hour in 9/26 patients from group D, 4/16 from group AM, and 10/28 from group D + AM (p = NS), b) by the end of the 96th hour, in 18/26 patients from group D, and in all patients from group AM and groupd D + AM. The corresponding duration of AF was 51 ± 34 hours, 17 ± 15 hours and 9 ± 13 hours, respectively (F = 15.4, p < 0.001). AF recurred in 9/26, 5/16 and 1/28 patients of groups D, AM and D + AM, respectively (p = 0.026). The required dosage of amiodarone was lower in the D + AM group than in the AM group (603 ± 563 mg versus 1058 ± 680 mg, p = 0.037).

Conclusions: Intravenous amiodarone was well tolerated in patients with AMI complicated by AF and was effective in decreasing the duration of AF. However, the combination of amiodarone and digoxin was superior to amiodarone alone in restoring sinus rhythm faster, maintaining sinus rhythm longer, and allowing the use of a lower cumulative amount of amiodarone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Behar S, Zahavi Z, Goldbourt U, Reicher-Reiss H and the Sprint Study Group. Long-term prognosis of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation complicating acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 1992; 13: 45-50.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Lusto Investigators. An international randomised trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1993; 329:6 73-86.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHAguidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 28:1 328-428.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Graettinger JS, Carleton RA, Muenster JJ. Circulatory consequences of changes in cardiac rhythm produced in patients by transthoracic direct current shock. J Clin Invest 1964; 43:2 290-302.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Killip T, Baer RA. Hemodynamic effects after reversion from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm by precordial shock. J Clin Invest 1966; 45:6 58-71.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pritchett EL. Management of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 1992; 326:12 64-71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Selzer A, Wray HW. Quinidine syncope: Paroxysmal ventricular fibrillation occurring during treatment of chronic atrial arrhythmias. Circulation 1964; 30: 17-26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Falk RH. Flecainide-induced ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation in patients treated for atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 1989; 111:1 07-11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sideris DA, Kontoyannis DA, Moulopoulos SD. Torsade des pointes and aprindine. Int J Cardiol 1985; 7: 413-416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Molstad P. Digitalis in patients after myocardial infarction. Herz 1993; 18:1 18-23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith TW. Digitalis. Mechanisms of action and clinical use. N Engl J Med 1988; 318:3 58-65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman BF, Bigger T. Digitalis and allied cardiac glycosides. In: Goodman LS and Gilmans A, eds. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics.NY: Pergamon Press, 1990: 8 14-39.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kober L, Torp-Pedersen C, Gadsboll N, Hildebrandt P, Hoilund-Garlsen PF. Is digoxin an independent risk factor for long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction? Eur Heart J 1994; 15:3 82-88.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kopelman HA, Horowitz LN. Efficacy and toxicity of amiodarone for the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1989; 31:3 55-66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mason JW. Amiodarone. N Engl J Med 1987; 316:4 55-66.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Anastasiou-Nana M, Levis G, Moulopoulos S. Pharmacokinetics of amiodarone after intravenous and oral administration. Int J Clin Pharmac Ther Toxicol 1982; 20:5 24-29.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Remme WJ, Kruyssen HA, Look MP, Hoogenhuyze DC, Krauss XH. Hemodynamic effects and tolerability of intravenous amiodarone in patients with impaired left ventricular function. Am Heart J 1991; 122: 96-103.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaikh NA, Downar E, Butany J. Amiodarone-an inhibitor of phospholipase activity: A comparative study of the inhibitory effects of amiodarone, chloroquine and chlorpromazine. Mol Cell Biochem 1987; 76:1 63-72.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh BN, VaughanWilliams EM. The effect of amiodarone, a new antianginal drug, on cardiac muscle. Br J Pharmacol 1970; 39:6 57-67.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mason JW, Hondeghem LM, Katzung BG. Block of inactivated sodium channels and of depolarization-induced automaticity in guinea pig papillary muscle by amiodarone. Circ Res 1984; 55:2 77-85.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hohnloser S, Meinertz T, Dammbacher T, et al. Electrocardiographic and antiarrhythmic effects of intravenous amiodarone: Results of a prospective, placebo controlled study. Am Heart J 1991; 121: 89-95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anastasiou-Nana M, Nanas J, Nanas S, et al. Effects of amiodarone on refractory ventricular fibrillation in acute myocardial infarction: Experimental study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23:2 53-58.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Venkatesh N, Padbury JF, Singh BN. Effects of amiodarone and desethylamiodarone on rabbit myocardial betaadrenoceptors and serum thyroid hormones-absence of relationship to serum and myocardial drug concentrations. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1986; 8:9 89-97.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chapman MJ, Moran JL, O'Fathartaigh MS, Peisach AR, Cunningham DN. Management of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the critically ill: A comparison of intravenous procainamide and amiodarone. Intens Care Med 1993; 19: 48-52.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leak D. Intravenous amiodarone in the treatment of refractory life-threatening cardiac arrhythmias in the critically ill patient. Am Heart J 1986; 111:4 56-62.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Galve E, Rius T, Ballester R, et al. Intravenous amiodarone in treatment of recent-onset atrial fibrillation: Results of a randomized, controlled study. J Am Coal Cardiol 1996; 27:10 79-82.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kerin NZ, Faitel K, Naini M. The efficacy of intravenous amiodarone for the conversion of chronic atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 49-53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kontoyannis DA, Anastasiou-Nana MI, Kontoyannis SA, Nanas JN, Kalabalikis A, Moulopoulos SD. Intravenous amiodarone restores sinus rhythm in acute myocardial infarction complicated with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 26: 901 (abstr).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gosselink AM, Crijns HJ, Van Gelder IC, Hillige H, Wiesfeld A, Lie K. Low dose amiodarone for maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation or flutter. J Am Med Assoc 1992; 267:32 89-93.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cowan JC, Gardiner P, Reid DS, Newell DJ, Cambell RW. A comparison of amiodarone and digoxin in the treatment of atrial fibrillation complicating suspected acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1986; 8:2 52-56.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Blandford RL, Crampton J, Kudlac H. Intravenous amiodarone in atrial fibrillation complicating myocardial infarction. Br Med J 1982; 284: 16-17.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hohnloser SH, Zabel M, Zehender M, Meinertz T, Just H. Efficacy of intravenously administered amiodarone for short-term control of serious arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1992; 20(Suppl. 2): S63-69.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Falk RH, Knowlton AA, Bernard SA, Gotlieb NE, Battinelli NJ. Digoxin for converting recent onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. A randomized, double-blinded trial. Ann Intern Med 1987; 106:5 03-06.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Levy S, Ricard P. Using the right drug: A treatment algorithm for regular supraventricular tachycardias. Eur Heart J 1997; 18(Suppl C): C27-32.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mostow Nd, Rakita L, Vrobel DR, Noon D, Blumer J. Amiodarone: Intravenous loading for rapid suppression of complex ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984; 4: 97-104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Helmy I, Herre JM, Gee G, et al. Use of intravenous amiodarone for emergency treatment of life threatening ventricular arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol 1988; 12:10 15-22.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ochi RP, Goldenberg IF, Almquist A, et al. Intravenous amiodarone for the rapid treatment of life threatening ventricular arrhythmias in critically ill patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64: 599-603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kusniec J, Strasberg B, Sclarovsky S, Klainman, Amgon J. The effect of intravenous amiodarone on heart rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction or ischemia and sinus tachycardia. Chest 1988; 94:5 84-88.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Charlier R. Cardiac actions in the dog of a new antagonist of adrenergic excitation which does not produce competitive blockade of adrenoceptors. Br J Pharmacol 1970; 39:6 68-74.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kosinski EJ, Albin JB, Young E, Lewis SM, Leland SJ. Hemodynamic effects of intravenous amiodarone. J AmColl Cardiol 1984; 4:5 65-70.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nalos PC, Ismail Y, Pappas JM, Nyitray W, DonMichael AT. Intravenous amiodarone for short-term treatment of refractory ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. Am Heart J 1991; 122:16 29-32.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hondeghem LM, Snyders DJ. Class III antiarrhythmic agents have a lot of potential but a long way to go. Reduced effectiveness and dangers of reverse use dependence. Circulation 1990; 81:6 86-90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Gagnol JP, Devos C, Clinet M, Nokin P. Amiodarone: Biochemical aspects and haemodynamic effects. Drugs 1985; 29(Suppl 3): 1-10.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Haworth RA, Goknur AB, Berkoff HA. Inhibition of ATPsensitive potassium channels of adult rat heart cells by antiarrhythmic drugs. Circ Res 1989; 65:11 57-60.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nanas JN, Mason JW. Pharmacokinetics and regional electrophysiological effects of intracoronary amiodarone administration. Circulation 1995; 91:4 51-61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kontoyannis, D.A., Anastasiou-Nana, M.I., Kontoyannis, S.A. et al. Intravenous Amiodarone Decreases the Duration of Atrial Fibrillation Associated with Acute Myocardial Infarction. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 15, 155–160 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011127030014

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011127030014

Navigation