Abstract
The Telecommunications Act of 1996 reduced restrictions on the cable TV industry, providing completely deregulated rates in March 1999. Prior to that time the cable industry was generally allowed to increase rates so long as additional channels were supplied. In this paper we develop a simple tradeoff between price and quality in order to calculate the welfare tradeoff to consumers of the provision of one additional satellite channel. Gauging the impact of this quality change on consumers alone, we conclude that the increase in consumer gains due to an extra channel provision are almost exactly counterbalanced by reductions due to price increases. This ceteris paribus calculation does not mean, of course, that dynamic supply effects from the provision and availability of more channels will not increase future competition and potential consumer benefits.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beard, T. R., and R. B. Ekelund, Jr. 1991. “Quality Choice and Price Discrimination: A Note on Dupuit's Conjecture.” Southern Economic Journal 57: 1155–1163.
Beard, T. R., and G. S. Ford. 1999. “Competition Between Wirelines Networks and Fragmented Duopoly with an Empirical Application to the Cable Television Industry.” Unpublished Working Paper (www.egroupassociates.com/download.htm).
Beil, R. O. Jr., P. T. Dazzio, R. B. Ekelund, Jr., and J. D. Jackson. 1993. “Competition and the Price of Municipal Cable Television Services: An Empirical Study.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 5: 401–415.
Boudreaux, D., and R. B. Ekelund, Jr. 1987. “Regulation as Exogenous Response to Market ‘Failure’: A Neo-Schumpeterian Perspective.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 143: 537–554.
Boudreaux, D., and R. B. Ekelund, Jr. 1993. “The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992: The Triumph of Private over Public Interest.” Alabama Law Review 44: 355–391.
Crawford, G. S. 1996. “The Impact of the 1992 Cable Act on Consumer Demand and Welfare: A Discrete-Choice Differentiated Products Approach.” Draft: Department of Economics, Stanford University.
Dupuit, J. [1844] 1952. “De La Mesure De L'Utilite Des Travaux Publics.” Annales des Ponts et Chaussees: Memoires et Documents, 2d ser., 8(2) 332–75. Trans. R. M. Barback, International Economics Papers, no. 2:83–110.
Emmons, W. M. III, and R. A. Prager. 1997. “The Effects of Market Structure and Ownership on Prices and Service Offerings in the U.S. Cable Television Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics 28: 732–750.
Fearing, J. C., and J. C. Lubinsky 1995. “Qualitative Differences in Competitive Cable Markets Prior to Rate Re-Regulation.” Masters of Public Policy in Business and Government Policy: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University (unpublished paper).
Hazlett, T. W. 1986. “Competition vs. Franchise Monopoly in Cable Television.” Contemporary Policy Issues 80–97.
Hazlett, T. W. 1991. “The Demand to Regulate Franchise Monopoly: Evidence from CATV Rate Deregulation in California.” Economic Inquiry 29: 275–296.
Hazlett, T. W., and M. L. Spitzer. 1997. Public Policy Toward Cable Television: The Economics of Rate Controls. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Levin, S. L., and J. B. Meisel. 1991. “Cable Television and Competition: Theory, Evidence and Policy.” Telecommunications Policy 15: 519–528.
Matthews, S., and J. Moore. 1987. “Monopoly Provision of Quality and Warranties: An Exploration in the Theory of Multidimensional Screening.” Econometrica 55: 441–467.
Mayo, J. W., and Y. Otsuka. 1991. “Demand, Pricing, and Regulation: Evidence from the Cable TV Industry.” RAND Journal of Economics 22: 396–410.
Mussa, M., and S. Rosen. 1978. “Monopoly and Product Quality.” Journal of Economic Theory 18: 301–317.
Otsuka, Y. 1997. “A Welfare Analysis of Local Franchise and Other Types of Regulation: Evidence from the Cable TV Industry.” Journal of Regulatory Economics 11: 157–180.
Rubinovitz, R. N. 1993. “Market Power and Price Increases for Basic Cable Service Since Deregulation.” RAND Journal of Economics 24: 1–18.
Spence, A. M. 1977. “Nonprice Competition.” American Economic Review 67: 255–259.
Srinagesh, P., and R. M. Bradburd. 1989. “Quality Distortion by a Discriminating Monopolist.” American Economic Review 79: 96–105.
Stigler, G. J. 1964. “A Theory of Oligopoly.” Journal of Political Economy 72: 44–61.
Tirole, J. 1989. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beard, T.R., Ekelund, R.B., Ford, G.S. et al. Price-Quality Tradeoffs and Welfare Effects in Cable Television Markets. Journal of Regulatory Economics 20, 107–123 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011124509158
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011124509158