Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dispersion of kangaroo rat mounds at multiple scales in New Mexico, USA

  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Burrowing mammals create disturbances that increase the ecological heterogeneity of landscapes. In desert systems, banner-tailed kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) construct large mounds that greatly influence the spatial patterning of soils, plants, and animals. The overall effects of the patches generated by D. spectabilis depend on the dispersion patterns of the mounds; these patterns may be sensitive to scale and landscape position. We examined the distribution of D. spectabilis mounds across multiple scales in four 40-ha grassland plots in New Mexico, USA. We used Ripley's K-function for our point-pattern analysis. The dispersion patterns of mounds were generally scale-sensitive but depended somewhat on plot-level densities, which were related to topographic position and grazing history. Mound spacing was either regular or random at small scales (0–50 m), random or aggregated at intermediate scales (50–300 m), and aggregated at large scales (300–3000 m). This scale-dependency of pattern reflected spatial domains in which different biotic (territoriality, dispersal, grazing) and abiotic (soil texture and drainage) factors exerted strong influences. How other organisms perceive the spatial patterning of mounds will depend on the extent of their movements. Patches may appear regular to one species but aggregated to another. The dispersion of D. spectabilis mounds also has implications for the spatial structuring of desert rodent communities. D. spectabilis excludes smaller species of kangaroo rats from areas around their mounds; they create spatial heterogeneity in behavioral dominance that may influence the distribution of subordinate species at multiple scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, E.S. and Tschinkel, W.R. 1995. Spatial dynamics of colony interactions in young populations of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Oecologia 102: 156–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Addicott, J.F., Aho, J.M., Antolin, M.F., Padilla, D.K., Richardson, J.S and Soluk, D.A. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. Oikos 49: 340–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allred, K.W. 1993. A field guide to the grasses of New Mexico. Agricultural Experiment Station, New Mexico State University, Lac Cruces, New Mexico, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amarasekare, P. 1994. Spatial population structure in the bannertailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis. Oecologia 100: 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, A.N. and Patel, A.D. 1994. Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities: an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species. Oecologia 98: 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M. 1992. Spatial analysis of two-species interactions. Oecologia 91: 134–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, M.C. and Kay, F.R. 1999. Banner-tailed kangaroo rat burrow mounds and desert grassland habitats. J. Arid Envir. 41: 147–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, T.C. and Gatrell, A.C. 1995. Interactive Spatial Data Analysis. Longman: Essex, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, T.L. 1972. Mound development by a pioneer population of the banner-tailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis baileyi Goldman, in eastern New Mexico. Am. Midl. Nat. 87: 201–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, T.L. 1988. Dipodomys spectabilis. Mammal. Spec. 311: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A., Thompson, D.B. and Brown, J.H. 1987. Spatial organization of a desert rodent community: food addition and species removal. Oecologia 72: 77–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, M.A. and Brown, J.H. 1992. Structure in a desert rodent community: use of space around Dipodomys spectabilis mounds. Oecologia 92: 242–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.H. and Heske, E.J. 1990. Control of a desert-grassland transition by a keystone rodent guild. Science 250: 1705–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D.J. 1992. Nearest-neighbor graphical analysis of spatial pattern and a test for competition in populations of singing crickets (Teleogryllus commodus). Oecologia 92: 548–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew, R.M. and Whitford, W.G. 1992. A long-term positive effect of kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) on creosotebushes (Larrea tridentata). J. Arid Envir. 22: 375–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N.A. 1991. Statistics for Spatial Data. JohnWiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, T.O. and Wiens, J.A. 1996. The distribution of ant colonies in a semiarid landscape: implications for community and ecosystem processes. Oikos 76: 301–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, M.J., Coffin, D.P. and Gosz, J.R. 1999. Burrowing activities of kangaroo rats and patterns in plant species dominance at a shortgrass steppe-desert grassland ecotone. J. Vege. Sci. 10: 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frye, R.J. 1983. Experimental field evidence of interspecific aggression between two species of kangaroo rat (Dipodomys). Oecologia 59: 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Getis, A. and Franklin, J. 1987. Second-order neighborhood analysis of mapped point patterns. Ecology 68: 473–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D.M. and Kulig, A.W. 1996. Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests. Ecology 77: 2393–2409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosz, J.R. 1993. Ecotone hierarchies. Ecol. Appl. 3: 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, Q. 1996. Effects of bannertail kangaroo rat mounds on smallscale plant community structure. Oecologia 106: 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haase, P. 1995. Spatial pattern analysis in ecology based on Ripley's K-function: introduction and methods of edge correction. J. Vege. Sci. 6: 575–582.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansell, M.H. 1993. The ecological impact of animal nests and burrows. Functional Ecol. 7: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, L.K. and Nicoletto, P.F. 1992. Kangaroo rat burrows structure the spatial organization of ground-dwelling animals in semiarid grasslands. J. Arid Envir. 23: 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heske, E.J., Brown, J.H. and Guo, Q. 1993. Effects of kangaroo rat exclusion on vegetation structure and plant species diversity in the Chihuahuan Desert. Oecologia 95: 520–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntley, N. and Inouye, R. 1988. Pocket gophers in ecosystems: patterns and mechanisms. BioScience 38: 786–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C.G., Lawton, J.H. and Shachak, M. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W.T. 1984. Natal philopatry in bannertail kangaroo rats. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 15: 151–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, W.T., Waser, P.M., Elliott, L.F., Link, N.E. and Bush, B.B. 1988. Philopatry, dispersal, and habitat saturation in the bannertailed kangaroo rat, Dipodomys spectabilis. Ecology 69: 1466–1473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klaas, B.A., Maloney, K.A. and Danielson, B.J. 2000. The tempo and mode of gopher mound production in a tallgrass prairie remnant. Ecography 23: 246–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotliar, N.B. and Wiens, J.A. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: a hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59: 253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, J.H. 1994. What do species do in ecosystems? Oikos 71: 367–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, C.L. and Tilman, D. 1997. Competition in spatial habitats. In Spatial Ecology: the Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions, pp. 185–203. Edited by D. Tilman and P. Kareiva. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, S.A. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73: 1943–1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, S.L. and Zollner, P.A. 1996. Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • MathSoft. 1997. S-Plus User's Guide. Data Analysis Products Division, MathSoft: Seattle, WA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeur, M. 1993. Characterizing spatial patterns of trees using stemmapped data. Forest Sci. 39: 756–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorhead, D.L., Fisher, F.M. and Whitford, W.G. 1988. Cover of spring annuals on nitrogen-rich kangaroo rat mounds in a Chihuahuan Desert grassland. Am. Midl. Nat. 120: 443–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moroka, N., Beck, R.F. and Pieper, R.D. 1982. Impact of burrowing activity of the banner-tail kangaroo rat on southern New Mexico desert rangelands. J. Range Manag. 35: 707–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mun, H.-T. and Whitford, W.G. 1990. Factors affecting annual plants assemblages on banner-tailed kangaroo rat mounds. J. Arid Envir. 18: 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parmenter, R.P. and Van Devender, T.R. 1995. Diversity, spatial variability, and functional roles of vertebrates in the desert grassland. In The Desert Grassland, pp. 196–229. Edited by M.P. McClaran and T.R. Van Devender. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D.L. and Parker, V.T. (eds.). 1998. Ecological Scale: Theory and Applications. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J.A. 1984. Territorial defense and advertisement by footdrumming in bannertail kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spectabilis) at high and low population densities. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 16: 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R.M. and Davis, R. 1998. Quantitative Spatial Analysis. Colorado State University: Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B.D. 1976. The second-order analysis of stationary point processes. J. Appl. Probab. 13: 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schooley, R.L., Bestelmeyer, B.T. and Kelly, J.F. 2000. Influence of small-scale disturbances by kangaroo rats on Chihuahuan Desert ants. Oecologia 125: 142–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, G.D. 1979. Foraging behavior and home range utilization of the bannertail kangaroo rat (Dipodomys spectabilis). Ecology 60: 657–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroder, G.D. and Geluso, K.N. 1975. Spatial distribution of Dipodomys spectabilis mounds. J. Mammal. 56: 363–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Lehman, C.L. and Kareiva, P. 1997. Population dynamics in spatial habitats. In Spatial Ecology: the Role of Space in Population Dynamics and Interspecific Interactions, pp. 3–20. Edited by D. Tilman and P. Kareiva. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture. 1988. Soil Survey of Socorro County Area, New Mexico. Soil Conservation Service, Washington D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valone, T.J., Brown, J.H. and Jacobi, C.L. 1995. Catastrophic decline of a desert rodent, Dipodomys spectabilis: insights from a long-term study. J. Mammal. 76: 428–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, P.M. and Jones, W.T. 1991. Survival and reproductive effort in banner-tailed kangaroo rats. Ecology 72: 771–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whicker, A.D. and Detling, J.K. 1988. Ecological consequences of prairie dog disturbances. BioScience 38: 778–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitford, W.G. and Kay, F.R. 1999. Biopedturbation by mammals in deserts: a review. J. Arid Envir. 41: 203–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1985. Vertebrate responses to environmental patchiness in arid and semiarid ecosystems. In The Ecology of Natural Disturbances and Patch Dynamics, pp. 169–193. Edited by S.T.A. Pickett and P.S. White. Academic Press, Orlando, Florida, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecol. 3: 385–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiens, J.A. and Milne, B.T. 1989. Scaling of ‘landscapes’ in landscape ecology, or, landscape ecology from a beetle's perspective. Landscape Ecol. 3: 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • With, K.A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecol. 9: 25–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA

    Robert L. Schooley & John A. Wiens

Authors
  1. Robert L. Schooley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John A. Wiens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schooley, R.L., Wiens, J.A. Dispersion of kangaroo rat mounds at multiple scales in New Mexico, USA. Landscape Ecology 16, 267–277 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011122218548

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011122218548

Search

Navigation