Abstract
The revival of the ideas of Alfred Schütz among Austrian economists is examined. In particular, this paper looks at Schütz's work on intersubjectivity as an alternative approach to market coordination. As opposed to the rational maximization of individuals, some have argued that Schütz's concept of intersubjective structures of meaning offers a better model for understanding how individuals act in the social world. This paper questions the soundness of utilizing Schütz's approach and suggests that the work of the sociologist Erving Goffman offers a potential model of social interaction that encompasses many elements of Schütz's framework but does not share the same limitations. Drawing on selected works of Goffman, a tentative model of social interaction and decision-making is put forward for discussion and further research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Addleson, M. (1995) Equilibrium Versus Understanding: Towards the Restoration of Economics as Social Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
Adler, P. A., Adler, P., and Fontana, A. (1987) “Everyday Life Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 217–235.
Augier, M., Knudsen, T., and Vendelo, M. (1998) “Three Perspectives on Time and Choice: Schütz, Shackle and Heidegger.” Unpublished manuscript.
Backhouse, R. E. (ed.) (1997) New Directions in Economic Methodology. New York: Routledge.
Baugh, K. R., Jr and Mohan, R. P. (1985) “Husserl, Schütz, and Garfinkel: Some Continuities and Contrasts.” Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 9(1): 2––12.
Blaug, M. (1990) Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Butos, W. N., and Koppl, R. G. (1997) “The Varieties of Subjectivism: Keynes and Hayek on Expectations.” History of Political Economy, 29: 2.
Chriss, J. J. (1995) “Some Thoughts on Recent Efforts to Further Systematize Goffman.” Sociological Forum, 10(1): 177–185.
Chriss, J. J. (1992) “How Is Society Possible? Intersubjectivity and the Fiduciary Attitude as Problems of the Social Group in Mead, Gurwitsch, and Schütz.” Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews, 21(2): 283–284.
Collins, R. (1989) “Toward a Neo-Meadian Sociology of Mind.” Symbolic Interaction, 12(1): 1–32.
Collins, R. (1993) “The Rationality of Avoiding Choice.” Rationality and Society, 5(1): 58–67.
Collins, R. (1994) Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.
Esser, H. (1993) “The Rationality of Everyday Behavior: A Rational Choice Reconstruction of the Theory of Action by Alfred Schütz.” Rationality and Society, 5(1): 7–31.
Forstater, M. “Lowe's Critique of Economic Laws and the Development of an Interpretive-Structural Economics.” Unpublished manuscript.
Foss, N. Juul. (1996) “Spontaneous Social Order: Economics and Schützian Sociology.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 55: 73–86.
Goffman, E. (1982) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.
Goffman, E. (1983) “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review, 48: 1–17.
Goffman, E. (1995) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gorman, R. A. (1977) The Dual Vision: Alfred Schütz and the Myth of Phenomenological Social Science Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Heritage, J. (1996) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Kivisto, P., and Swatos, W. H. Jr. (1990) “Weber and Interpretive Sociology in America.” The Sociological Quarterly, 31(1): 149–164.
Koppl, R. (1992) “Invisible-Hand Explanations and Neoclassical Economics: Toward a Post Marginalist Economics.” Journal of Institutional & Theoretical Economics, 148(2): 292–313.
Koppl, R. (1994) “Lachmann on Schütz and Shackle.” Advances in Austrian Economics, 1: 289–302.
Koppl, R. (1997) “Mises and Schütz on Ideal Types.” Cultural Dynamics, 9(1): 63–76.
Langsdorf, L. (1986) “Making Sense of Reification: Alfred Schütz and the Constructionist Theory.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 16(2): 262–264.
Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. New York: Routledge.
Ostrow, J. M. (1996) “Spontaneous Involvement and Social Life.” Sociological Perspectives, 39(3): 341–351.
Rima, I. H. (1996) Development of Economic Analysis. New York: Routledge.
Shearmur, J. (1993) “Schütz, Machlup and Rational Economic Man: Some Problems for Economic Imperialism?” Review of Political Economy, 5(4): 491–507.
Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society. University of California Press: Berkeley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mote, J.E. From Schütz to Goffman: The Search for Social Order. The Review of Austrian Economics 14, 219–231 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011116318224
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011116318224