Skip to main content
Log in

From Schütz to Goffman: The Search for Social Order

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The revival of the ideas of Alfred Schütz among Austrian economists is examined. In particular, this paper looks at Schütz's work on intersubjectivity as an alternative approach to market coordination. As opposed to the rational maximization of individuals, some have argued that Schütz's concept of intersubjective structures of meaning offers a better model for understanding how individuals act in the social world. This paper questions the soundness of utilizing Schütz's approach and suggests that the work of the sociologist Erving Goffman offers a potential model of social interaction that encompasses many elements of Schütz's framework but does not share the same limitations. Drawing on selected works of Goffman, a tentative model of social interaction and decision-making is put forward for discussion and further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Addleson, M. (1995) Equilibrium Versus Understanding: Towards the Restoration of Economics as Social Theory. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler, P. A., Adler, P., and Fontana, A. (1987) “Everyday Life Sociology.” Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augier, M., Knudsen, T., and Vendelo, M. (1998) “Three Perspectives on Time and Choice: Schütz, Shackle and Heidegger.” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Backhouse, R. E. (ed.) (1997) New Directions in Economic Methodology. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baugh, K. R., Jr and Mohan, R. P. (1985) “Husserl, Schütz, and Garfinkel: Some Continuities and Contrasts.” Quarterly Journal of Ideology, 9(1): 2––12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, M. (1990) Economic Theory in Retrospect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butos, W. N., and Koppl, R. G. (1997) “The Varieties of Subjectivism: Keynes and Hayek on Expectations.” History of Political Economy, 29: 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chriss, J. J. (1995) “Some Thoughts on Recent Efforts to Further Systematize Goffman.” Sociological Forum, 10(1): 177–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chriss, J. J. (1992) “How Is Society Possible? Intersubjectivity and the Fiduciary Attitude as Problems of the Social Group in Mead, Gurwitsch, and Schütz.” Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews, 21(2): 283–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1989) “Toward a Neo-Meadian Sociology of Mind.” Symbolic Interaction, 12(1): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1993) “The Rationality of Avoiding Choice.” Rationality and Society, 5(1): 58–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1994) Four Sociological Traditions. New York: Oxford University Press.

  • Esser, H. (1993) “The Rationality of Everyday Behavior: A Rational Choice Reconstruction of the Theory of Action by Alfred Schütz.” Rationality and Society, 5(1): 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forstater, M. “Lowe's Critique of Economic Laws and the Development of an Interpretive-Structural Economics.” Unpublished manuscript.

  • Foss, N. Juul. (1996) “Spontaneous Social Order: Economics and Schützian Sociology.” American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 55: 73–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1982) Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1983) “The Interaction Order.” American Sociological Review, 48: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1995) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, R. A. (1977) The Dual Vision: Alfred Schütz and the Myth of Phenomenological Social Science Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J. (1996) Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Blackwell.

  • Kivisto, P., and Swatos, W. H. Jr. (1990) “Weber and Interpretive Sociology in America.” The Sociological Quarterly, 31(1): 149–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, R. (1992) “Invisible-Hand Explanations and Neoclassical Economics: Toward a Post Marginalist Economics.” Journal of Institutional & Theoretical Economics, 148(2): 292–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, R. (1994) “Lachmann on Schütz and Shackle.” Advances in Austrian Economics, 1: 289–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koppl, R. (1997) “Mises and Schütz on Ideal Types.” Cultural Dynamics, 9(1): 63–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langsdorf, L. (1986) “Making Sense of Reification: Alfred Schütz and the Constructionist Theory.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 16(2): 262–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, T. (1997). Economics and Reality. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrow, J. M. (1996) “Spontaneous Involvement and Social Life.” Sociological Perspectives, 39(3): 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rima, I. H. (1996) Development of Economic Analysis. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearmur, J. (1993) “Schütz, Machlup and Rational Economic Man: Some Problems for Economic Imperialism?” Review of Political Economy, 5(4): 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society. University of California Press: Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mote, J.E. From Schütz to Goffman: The Search for Social Order. The Review of Austrian Economics 14, 219–231 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011116318224

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011116318224

Keywords

Navigation