Skip to main content

Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria

Abstract

In recent years interaction between universities and the business sector and the role of these collaborations in fostering innovation has received greater attention. This paper analyzes different types of interactions between the two sectors from the perspectives of universities and firms. The three major research questions address the frequency of different types of interactions, the benefits that companies derive from interaction with universities and determinants of interaction for both sectors.

Two different surveys form the empirical base for this paper: One among innovative firms in Austria, one among all Austrian university departments. The methodologies we use are analyses of variance and logistic regressions. Our results demonstrate that the main channel of knowledge transfer from universities to the business sector still occurs through the mobility of human capital. The major barriers of interaction lie in the differences between “cultures” of the two spheres as well as lack of information at the side of firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Acs Z., F. Fitzroy, and I. Smith, 1994, ‘High Technology Employment and University R&D Spillovers: Evidence from US Cities’, paper presented at the 41st North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Niagara Falls.

  2. Almeida P. and B. Kogut, 1995, ‘The Geographic Localization of Ideas and the Mobility of Patent Holders’, paper presented at the Conference on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Global Economy, Organized by CIBER, University of Maryland, October 20.

  3. Anselin L., A. Varga, and Z. Acs, 1997, ‘Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations’, Journal of Urban Economics, forthcoming.

  4. Bania N., R. Eberts, and M. Fogarty, 1993, ‘Universities and the Startup of New Companies: Can We Generalise from Route 128 and Silicon Valley?’ The Review of Economics and Statistics 75, 761–766.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bania N., L. Calkins, and R. Dalenberg, 1992, ‘The Effects of Regional Science and Technology Policy on the Geographic Distribution of Industrial R&D Laboratories’, Journal of Regional Science 32, 209–228.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, J.L., A.P. Rogaczewska, and A.L. Vinding, 1999, ‘Synthesis Report of the Focus Group on Innovative Firms and Networks’, http://www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/ s t/inte/index.htm, OECD, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, W., 1995, ‘Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity’, in Stoneman, P. (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 182–264.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal, 1989, ‘Innovation and Learning: the Two Faces of R&D’, Economic Journal 99, 569–596.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edquist, C. (ed.), 1997, Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fischer, M.M., 2000, ‘Innovation, Knowledge Creation and Systems of Innovation’, The Annals of Regional Science, to be published.

  11. Freeman, C., 1987, Japan: A New National System of Innovation? London, New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geuna, A., 1999, ‘The Changing Rationale for European University Research Funding: Are there Negative Unintended Consequences’, SPRU Electronic Working Papers Series, No. 33, Brighton, UK, http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/

  13. Grossman G. and E. Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in a Global Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grossman G. and E. Helpman, 1994, ‘Endogenous Innovation in the Theory of Growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23–44.

  15. Hicks, D., P. Isard, and B. Martin, 1993, ‘University–Industry Alliances as Revealed by Joint Publications’, Mimeo, SPRU.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jaffe A.B., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson, 1993, ‘Geographic Localisation of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations’, Quartlery Journal of Economics 108, 577–598.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jaffe, A.B., 1989, ‘The Real Effects of Academic Research’, American Economic Review 79, 957–970.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly K., J. Weber, J. Friend, S. Atchinson, G. DeGeorge, and W. Holstein, 1992, ‘Hot Spots. America's New Growth Regions are Blossomin Despite the Slump’, Business Week, October 29, 80–88.

  19. Hall, B.H., Link, A. and Scott, J.T., 2000, ‘Barriers Inhibiting Industry from Partnering with Universities’, paper presented at the Purdue University Workshop on Organizational Issues in University-Industry Technology Transfer, June 9–11, 2000.

  20. Lundvall, B.-Å., 1988, ‘Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User.Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory, London and New York: Pinter, pp. 349–369.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lundvall, B.-Å. (ed.), 1992, National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, London and New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Martin B., A. Salter, D. Hicks, K. Pavitt, J. Senker, M. Sharp, and N. von Tunzelmann, 1996, ‘The relationship between publicly funded basic research and economic performance’, SPRU Report prepared for HM Treasury.

  23. Nelson, R.R. (ed.), 1993, National Systems of Innovation: A Comparative Study, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. OECD, 1996, ‘The Knowledge Based Economy’, OECD/GD (96)102, Paris, http://www.oecd.org/dsti/sti/s_t/index.htm.

  25. OECD, 1998, ‘Main Science and Technology Indicators’, Paris.

  26. Parker, D. and D. Zilberman, 1993, ‘University Technology Transfers: Impacts on Local and U.S. Economies’, Contemporary Policy Issues 11, 87–99.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Storey, D.J. and Tether, B.S., 1998, ‘New technology-based firms in the European union: an introduction’, Research Policy

    Google Scholar 

  28. Romer, P.M., 1986, ‘Increasing Returns and the Long-Run Growth’, Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Romer, P.M., 1990, ‘Endogenous Technological Change’, Journal of Political Economy 98, 72–102.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Romer, P.M., 1994, ‘The Origins of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Schartinger, D., C. Rammer, M.M. Fischer, and J. Fröhlich, 2000, ‘Universities and Firms: Evidence of Knowledge Interactions in Austria’, Research Policy, accepted.

  32. Schibany, A., 1998, ‘Co-operative Behaviour of Innovative Firms in Austria’, tip-survey.

  33. Schmoch, U., 1999, ‘Interaction of Universities and Industrial Enterprises in Germany and the United States–A Comparison’, Industry and Innovation 6(1), 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Varga, A., 2000, ‘Regional Economic Effects of University Research: A Survey’, Working paper. Department for Economic Geography and Geoinformatics, University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schartinger, D., Schibany, A. & Gassler, H. Interactive Relations Between Universities and Firms: Empirical Evidence for Austria. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 255–268 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011110207885

Download citation

Keywords

  • Economic Growth
  • Research Question
  • Human Capital
  • Empirical Evidence
  • Logistic Regression