Skip to main content
Log in

The Theory and Practice of Regulation with Multinational Enterprises

  • Published:
Journal of Regulatory Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ability of firms to operate in several markets at the same time is changing regulators' tasks. Regulatory bodies are now having to deal with multinational firms which spread their business activities all over the world. This paper analyzes the theory and practice of regulation in terms of the multinational dimensions of regulated firms. We show that the perceived theory of regulation is indeed affected, and that new issues arise both from a positive and normative point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antonelli, C. 1995. “Technological Change and Multinational Growth in International Telecommunication Services.” Review of Industrial Organization 10(2): 161–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J. 1974. The Limits of Organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. 1985. “Noncooperative Regulation of a Nonlocalized Externality.” Rand Journal of Economics 16(4): 553–567.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. 1989. “Design of Regulatory Mechanisms and Institutions.” Schmalensee, R. and Willig R. D., eds. Handbook of industrial organization. Volume 2. Handbooks in Economics, no. 10. Amsterdam, Oxford and Tokyo: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P., and R. B. Myerson. 1982. “Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs.” Econometrica 50(4): 911–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, D. P. 1997. “Integrated Strategies and International Trade Disputes: the Kodak-Fujifilm Case.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategies 6(2): 291–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D., and M. D. Whinston. 1986. “Common Agency.” Econometrica 54(4): 923–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biglaiser, G., and C. Mezzetti. 1993. “Principals Competing for an Agent in the Presence of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard.” Journal of Economic Theory 61(2): 302–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlin, E., and O. Granstrand (eds). 1994. The Race to European Eminence: Who are the Coming Tele-service Multinationals? Amsterdam: North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E. W., and T. A. Gresik. 1996. “Regulation of Multinational Firms with Two Active Governments: A Common Agency Approach.” Journal of Publics Economics 59(1): 33–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, E. W., and T. A. Gresik. 1997. “Information Sharing between Asymmetrically Informed Principals.” Mimeo, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Economics.

  • Brainard, L., and D. Martimort. 1996. “Strategic Trade Policy Design with Asymmetric Information and Public Contracts.” Review of Economic Studies 63(1): 81–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J. A., and B. J. Spencer. 1985. “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry.” Journal of International Economics 18(1–2): 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calzolari, G. 1998. “Regulation in an International Setting, the Case of a Multinational Enterprise.” Mimeo, GREMAQ, University of Toulouse.

  • Calzolari, G. 1999. “Optimal Regulation of Multinational Enterprises.” Working paper GREMAQ, University of Toulouse and Feem 51.99.

  • Calzolari, G., K. Diaw, and J. Pouyet. 1999. “Regulatory Competition and Exclusion in an International Context. Mimeo, University of Toulouse.

  • Calzolari, G., and A Pavan. 2000. “Information Sharing between Principals.” Mimeo, GREMAQ, University of Toulouse and University of Bologna.

  • Calzolari, G., and C. Scarpa. 1999a. “Non-intrinsic Common Agency.” Mimeo, University of Bologna.

  • Calzolari, G., and C. Scarpa. 1999b. “Regulation at Home, Competition Abroad: A Theoretical Analysis.” Working paper, University of Bologna.

  • Caves, R. E. 1996. Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Combes, P.-P., B. Caillaud, and B. Jullien. 1997. “Common Market with Regulated Firms.” Annales d' Economie et de Statistique 47(0): 65–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congleton, R. D. 1984. “Committees and Rent-Seeking Effort.” Journal of Public Economics 25(1–2): 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana, J. D. 1993. “The Organization and Scope of Agents: Regulating Multiproduct Industries.” Journal of Economic Theory 59(2): 288–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C., and T. R. Lewis. 1991. “Negotiated Trade Restrictions with Private Political Pressure.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4): 1287–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grahan, E. M., and P. R. Krugman. 1991. Foreign Direct Investment in the United States. Washington Institute for International Economics.

  • Gresik, T. A. 1998. “The Task of Taxing Transnationals.” Mimeo, keynote speech for the Petropol Research Conference on Nation Resource Management, Bergen Norway, October 22–23.

  • Grossman, G. M., and E. Helpman. 1994. “Protection for Sale.” American Economic Review 84(4): 883–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. R. 1993. “On the Sensitivity of R&D to Delicate Tax Changes: The Behavior of U.S. Multinationals.” In Studies in international taxation. edited by Alberto Giovannini, R. Glenn Hubbard, and Joel Slemrod. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 149–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S. 1976. “An International Trade and Investment Theory of the Firm.” Oxford Economics Paper 28(2): 258–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivaldi, M., and D. Martimort. 1994. “Competition under Nonlinear Pricing.” Annales d' Economie et de Statistique 34(0): 71–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J. 1994. “The New Regulatory Economics: Ten Years After.” Econometrica 62(3): 507–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J., and D. Martimort. 1999. “Separation of Regulators Against Collusive Behavior.” RAND Journal of Economics 30(2): 232–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laffont, J.-J., and J. Tirole. 1993. A Theory of Incentives in Procurement and Regulation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martimort, D. 1992. “Multi-principaux avec Anti-selection.” Annales d' économie et de Statistique 28(0): 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martimort, D. 1996. “The Multiprincipal Nature of Government.” European Economic Review 40(3–5): 673–685.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martimort, D. 1999. “Renegotiation Design with Multiple Regulators.” Journal of Economic Theory 88(2): 261–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martimort, D., and L. A. Stole. 1997. “Communication Spaces, Equilibria Sets, and the Revelation Principle under Common Agency.” Discussion paper N. STE029, The University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.

  • Mezzetti, C. 1997. “Common Agency with Horizontally Differentiated Principals.” RAND Journal of Economics 28(2): 323–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, T. E., and G. Torsvik. 1995. “Intertemporal Common Agency and Organizational Design: How Much Decentralization?” European Economic Review 39(7): 1405–1428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, T. E., and P. Osmundsen. 2000. “Strategic Tax Competition; Implications of National Ownership.” Working paper N. 281, CESifo Working Paper Series.

  • Stole, L. A. 1992. “Mechanism Design Under Common Agency.” Mimeo, University of Chicago.

  • U.N.C.T.A.D. 2000. World Investment Report 2000. New York: United Nations Program on Transnational Corporations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. 1994. “Positive Theories of Multinational Banking: Eclectic Theory versus Internationalization Theory.” Journal of Economic Surveys 11(1): 71–100.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Calzolari, G. The Theory and Practice of Regulation with Multinational Enterprises. Journal of Regulatory Economics 20, 191–211 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011107413701

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011107413701

Keywords

Navigation