Kept Under the Hood: Neglect of the Clitoris in Common Vernacular

Abstract

Even though the “clitoris” is the organ homologous to the “penis,” this term may not be commonly used as the female counterpart to the penis. We conducted three studies to examine the usage of terminology for female sexual anatomy. In the first study 57 books in a university computer database for “sex instruction” were examined for the inclusion of terms such as penis, clitoris, vagina, vulva, and uterus. Penis was mentioned more often than either the clitoris or vulva in these books. In the second and third studies we investigated the terminology used by college students as well as their sexual attitudes and knowledge. Participants in the studies were Euro-American (76%/76%, Study 2/Study 3 respectively), Hispanic (18%/14%), and African American (4%/7%); students reported that they were overwhelmingly taught vagina as the female counterpart to the penis. Believing that the inner portion of the vagina is the most sexually sensitive part of the female body correlated with negative attitudes toward masturbation (Study 2) and agreement with sex myths (Studies 2 and 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

REFERENCES

  1. Allgeier, E. R., & Allgeier, A.R. (2000). Sexual interactions (5th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkins, A. (1998, August). The gender divide. Parenting, 147, 149.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barstow, D. (1999). Female genital mutilation: The penultimate gender abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 23, 501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bem, S. L. (1998). An unconventional family. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett, P. (1993). Critical clitoridectomy: Female sexual imagery and feminist psychoanalytic theory. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 18, 235–259.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyd, B. M. (1999, April/May). Outside the box. Ms., IX (3), 52–53.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burn, H. J. (1969). Better than the birds, smarter than the bees: No nonsense answers to honest questions about sex and growing up. Nashville: Abingdon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coventry, C. (2000, October/November). Making the cut. Ms., X (6), 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Davis, C. M., Blank, J., Lin, H., and Bonillas, C. (1996). Characteristics of vibrator use among women. The Journal of Sex Research, 33, 313–320.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ellis, H. (1931). More essays of love and virtue. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Doran, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freud, S. (1927). Some psychological consequences of the anatomical distinction between the sexes. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 8, 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hyde, J. S., & DeLamater, J.D. (2000). Understanding Human Sexuality (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Irvine, J.M. (1995). Sexuality education across cultures:Working with differences. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCammon, S., Knox, D., & Schacht, C. (1998). Making choices in sexuality: Research and applications. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, W. R., & Lief, H. I. (1976). Masturbatory attitudes, knowledge, and experience: Data from the Sex Knowledge and Attitude Test (SKAT). Archives of Sexual Behavior, 5, 447–467.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Oliver, M. B., & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29–51.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosen, R.C., & Leiblum, S. R. (1995). Treatment of sexual disorders in the 1990s: An integrated approach. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 877–890.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Siecus. (1998, June 22). [On-line].Available: http://www.siecus.org/parent/ohno/ohno0006.html.

  19. Sprecher, S., Barbee, A., & Schwartz, P. (1995). “Was it good for you, too?”: Gender differences in first sexual intercourse experiences. The Journal of Sex Research, 32, 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogletree, S.M., Ginsburg, H.J. Kept Under the Hood: Neglect of the Clitoris in Common Vernacular. Sex Roles 43, 917–926 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011093123517

Download citation

Keywords

  • College Student
  • Social Psychology
  • Negative Attitude
  • Female Body
  • Sexual Attitude