Drawing on Goffman's stigma framework, this in-depth study explored the experiences of 26 infertile Jewish women in Israel, the country with a strong pronatalist ideology, both institutional and popular. The findings are in line with the key postulates of the stigma concept: women's coping strategies included selective disclosure, avoidance of exposure of their “hidden disability,” and other information management techniques. Infertility became a “master status” for these women, undermining any other merits and achievements they might have. Most women fully internalized and endorsed the pronatalist discourse by way of pursuing long-term and burdensome infertility treatments, at any personal cost. The paper argues that resistance to stigma of infertility is only possible where women dare question the motherhood imperative, which is clearly not the case with most Israelis. Material and mental resources needed for resisting the stigma of infertility are found among few educated professional women. The paper suggests three theoretical inferences: (a) stigma as a psychological response is graded by the extent of individual's conformity with the dominant norms; (b) the stigma of childlessness is most devastating for the less educated women without career or other nonfamilial aspirations; and (c) in pronatalist societies, the coping and management approach to the study of infertility is more relevant than the resistance approach suggested by some authors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Barraza-Llorens, M. (1998). Effectiveness of assisted conception: A systematic review of the literature. Heslington, UK: York University Health Economics Consortium.
Brosch, I. (1995). Fertility preferences of Israeli couples: A sociological study. Ph.D. thesis, University of Tel-Aviv (Hebrew).
Crabtree, B. F., & Miller, W. L. (1992). A template approach to text analysis: Developing and using codebooks. In B. F. Crabtree, & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Eugster, A., & Vingerhoets, A. J. J. M. (1999). Psychological aspects of in vitro fertilization: A review. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 575–589.
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44, 3–21.
Franklin, S. (1995). Postmodern procreation: A cultural account of assisted reproduction. In F. D., Ginzberg, & R. Rapp, (Eds.), Conceiving the new world order: The global politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Friedlander, D., & Feldmann, C. (1993). The modern shift to below-replacement fertility: Has Israel's population joined the process? Population Studies, 47, 295–306.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Greil, A. L. (1991). Not yet pregnant: Infertile couples in contemporary America. NewBrunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Hennmann, T. (1993). Coping with infertility. M.A. thesis,. Bar-Ilan University Ramat-Gan, Israel (Hebrew).
Kirkman, M., & Rosenthal, D. (1999). Representations of reproductive technology in women's narratives of infertility. Women and Health, 29(2), 17–36.
Kohler Riessman, C. (2000). Stigma and everyday resistance practices: Childless women in South India. Gender and Society, 14(1), 111–135.
Lasker, J. N., & Borg, S. (1994). In search of parenthood: Coping with infertility and high-tech conception. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Lev, B. (1999). Assisted reproduction in Israel: An overview. Presentation at the Israeli-British Conference on the Religious and Bioethical Aspects of Assisted Reproduction, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Lorber, J. (1988). IVF and gender politics. Women and Health, 13, 117–133.
May, E. T. (1995). Barren in the promised land: Childless Americans and the pursuit of happiness.New York: Basic Books.
Miall, C. F. (1986). The stigma of involuntary childlessness. Social Problems, 33, 268–282.
Peritz, E., & Baras, M. (1992). Studies in the fertility of Israel. Jerusalem: The Hebrew University.
Phillips, Z., Barraza-Llorens, M., & Posnett, J. (2000). Evaluation of the relative costeffectiveness of treatments for infertility in the UK. Human Reproduction, 15(1), 95–106.
Portugese, J. (1998) Fertility policy in Israel. The politics of religion, gender, and nation.Westport, CT, and London, UK: Praeger.
Rothman, B. K. (1994). The tentative pregnancy: Amniocentesis and the sexual politics of motherhood. (Rev. ed.) London: Pandora.
Solomon, A. (1991). Anything for a baby: Reproductive technologies in Israel. In B. Swirski & M. P. Safir (Eds.), Calling the equality bluff. New York: Pergamon.
Stanton, A., & Dunkel Schetter, C. (1991). Infertility: Perspectives from stress and coping research.NY & London: Plenum Press.
Stanworth, M. (Ed.). (1987). Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood and medicine.Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Whiteford, L. M., & Gonzalez, L. (1995). Stigma: The hidden burden of infertility. Social Science & Medicine, 40(1), 27–36.
About this article
Cite this article
Remennick, L. Childless in the Land of Imperative Motherhood: Stigma and Coping Among Infertile Israeli Women. Sex Roles 43, 821–841 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011084821700
- Infertility Treatment
- Jewish Woman
- Personal Cost
- Master Status