Research in Higher Education

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 541–567 | Cite as

Sex and Race Differences in Faculty Tenure and Promotion

  • Laura W. Perna

Abstract

Data from the 1993 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty are used to explore sources of the lower representation of women and minorities among tenured than tenure track faculty and among full professors than lower ranking faculty. A 2-step approach is used. First, differences in the probability of being tenured rather than on a tenure track are explored. Then, differences in the probability of holding the rank of full professor among faculty who are tenured are examined. Logistic regression analyses are used to isolate the effects of sex and race on the dependent variables after controlling for human capital, productivity, and structural characteristics. For both tenure and promotion to full professor, separate analyses are conducted for women and men in order to explore sex differences in the tenure and promotion processes. All analyses are conducted separately for full-time faculty working at public 2-year institutions and full-time faculty working at 4-year institutions.

faculty gender equity race equity tenure rank 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ashraf, J. (1994). Differences in returns to education: an analysis by race. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 53(3): 281-290.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, R. G., and Chronister, J. L. (1996). Full-time non-tenure track faculty. NEA Higher Education Research Center Update 2(5).Google Scholar
  3. Bayer, A. E., and Astin, H. S. (1968). Sex differences in academic rank and salary among science doctorates in teaching. Journal of Human Resources 3(2): 191-200.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy 70 Supplement (5): 9-49.Google Scholar
  5. Bellas, M. L. (1994). Comparable worth in academia: the effects on faculty salaries of the sex composition and labor market conditions of academic disciplines. American Sociological Review 59(6): 807-821.Google Scholar
  6. Bellas, M. L. (1997). The scholarly productivity of academic couples. In M. A. Ferber and J. W. Loeb (eds.), Academic Couples: Problems and Promises. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bellas, M. L., and Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). Faculty time allocations and research productivity: gender, race, and family effects. Review of Higher Education 22(4): 367-390.Google Scholar
  8. Biglan, A. (1973). Characteristics of subject matter in different academic areas. Journal of Applied Psychology 57(3): 195-203.Google Scholar
  9. Bowen, H. R., and Schuster, J. H. (1986). American Professors: A National Resource Imperiled. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Broder, I. E. (1993). Professional achievements and gender differences among academic economists. Economic Inquiry 31: 116-127.Google Scholar
  11. Cabrera, A. F. (1994). Logistic regression analysis in higher education: An applied perspective. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. 10, pp. 225-256. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  12. DeYoung, A. J. (1989). Economics and American Education: A Historical and Critical Overview of the Impact of Economic Theories on Schooling in the United States. White Plains, NY: Longman Inc.Google Scholar
  13. Dreijmanis, J. (1991). Higher education and employment: is professional employment a right? Higher Education Review 23(3): 7-18.Google Scholar
  14. Dwyer, P. (1994). Gender differences in the scholarly activities of accounting academics: an empirical investigation. Issues in Accounting Education 9(2): 231-246.Google Scholar
  15. England, P. (1982). The failure of human capital theory to explain occupational sex segregation. Journal of Human Resources 17: 358-370.Google Scholar
  16. Fairweather, J. S. (1995). Myths and realities of academic labor markets. Economics of Education Review 14(2): 179-192.Google Scholar
  17. Fairweather, J. S. (1996). Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  18. Fox, M. F. (1985). Publication, performance, and reward in science and scholarship. In J. C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, pp. 255-282. New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  19. Gappa, J. M., and Leslie, D. W. (1993). Invisible Faculty: Improving the Status of Part-Timers in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  20. Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., and Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship Assessed: Evaluation of the Professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc.Google Scholar
  21. Gordon, N. M., Morton, T. E., & Braden, I. C. (1974). Faculty salaries: is there discrimination by sex, race, and discipline? American Economic Review 64(3): 419-427.Google Scholar
  22. Hoffman, C. A., and Ritchey, P. N. (1992). Assessing the differences in distance of interstate migration, 1980. Sociological Focus 25(3): 241-255.Google Scholar
  23. Johnsrud, L. K. (1993). Women and minority faculty experiences: defining and responding to diverse realities. In J. Gainen and R. Boice (eds.), Building a Diverse Faculty, Vol. 53, pp. 3-16. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, L. S. (1998). Scaling the Ivory Tower: Merit and Its Limits in Academic Careers (2nd ed.). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Marshall, H., and Perrucci. (1982). The structure of academic fields and rewards in academia. Sociology and Social Research 66(2): 127-147.Google Scholar
  26. McElrath, K. (1992). Gender, career disruption, and academic rewards. Journal of Higher Education, 63(3): 269-281.Google Scholar
  27. Menges, R. J., and Exum, W. H. (1983). Barriers to the progress of women and minority faculty. Journal of Higher Education 54(2): 123-144.Google Scholar
  28. Park, S. M. (1996). Research, teaching, and service: why shouldn't women's work count? Journal of Higher Education 67(1): 46-84.Google Scholar
  29. Persell, C. H. (1983). Gender, rewards and research in education. Psychology of Women Quarterly 8(1): 33-47.Google Scholar
  30. Pfeffer, J., and Langton, N. (1988). Wage inequality and the organization of work: the case of academic departments. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 588-606.Google Scholar
  31. Ransom, M. R., and Megdal, S. B. (1993). Sex differences in the academic labor market in the affirmative action era. Economics of Education Review 12(1): 21-43.Google Scholar
  32. Riggs, M. L., Downey, R. G., McIntyre, P. E., and Hoyt, D. P. (1986). Using discriminant analysis to predict faculty rank. Research in Higher Education 25(4): 365-376.Google Scholar
  33. Rosenfeld, R. A., and Jones, J. A. (1987). Patterns and effects of geographic mobility for academic women and men. Journal of Higher Education 58(5): 493-515.Google Scholar
  34. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 51(1): 1-17.Google Scholar
  35. Selfa, L. A., Suter, N., Myers, S., Koch, S., Johnson, R. A., Zahs, D. A., Kuhr, B. D., and Abraham, S. Y. (1997). 1993 National Study of Postsecondary Faculty (NSOPF-93) Data File User's Manual Public-Use Institution File and Restricted-Use Faculty File. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  36. Smart, J. C. (1991). Gender equity in academic rank and salary. Review of Higher Education 14(4): 511-526.Google Scholar
  37. Smart, J. C., and McLaughlin, G. W. (1978). Reward structures of academic disciplines. Research in Higher Education 8: 39-55.Google Scholar
  38. Stewart, K. D., Dalton, M. M., Dino, G. A., and Wilkinson, S. P. (1996). The development of salary goal modeling: from regression analysis to a value-based prescriptive approach. Journal of Higher Education 67(5): 555-576.Google Scholar
  39. Szafran, R. F. (1984). Universities and Women Faculty: Why Some Organizations Discriminate More Than Others. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Tierney, W. G. (1997). Organizational socialization in higher education. Journal of Higher Education 68(1): 1-16.Google Scholar
  41. Tierney, W. G., and Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and Tenure: Community and Socialization in Academe. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tierney, W. G., and Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process (Report No. 6). Washington, DC: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.Google Scholar
  43. Toutkoushian, R. K. (1999). The status of academic women in the 1990s: no longer outsiders, but not yet equals. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 39(special issue): 679-698.Google Scholar
  44. Weiler, W. C. (1990). Integrating rank differences into a model of male-female faculty salary discrimination. Quarterly Review of Economics and Business 30(1): 3-15.Google Scholar
  45. Youn, T. I. K. (1988). Studies of academic markets and careers: an historical review. In D. W. Breneman and T. I. K. Youn (eds.), Academic Labor Markets and Careers, pp. 8-27. New York: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  46. Youn, T. I. K. (1992). The sociology of academic careers and academic labor markets. Research in Labor Economics 13: 101-130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laura W. Perna
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Education Policy and LeadershipUniversity of Maryland at College ParkCollege Park

Personalised recommendations