Abstract
This paper tests hypotheses implicit in the societal-reaction perspective concerning the nature and pattern of the relationship between prior and current youth court dispositions. The dispositional stage is the most critical decision-making level which young offenders encounter in their contact with the youth court system. Previous research has produced inconsistent results in the attempt to determine which model or models of justice underlie dispositional decisions by youth court judges. Log-linear modeling is employed on 16,636 youth court cases in Canada in 1993/1994 to determine the nature and magnitude of the relationship between current and prior dispositions. The results indicate that prior youth court dispositions exert a significant impact on current dispositions, even when relevant variables are controlled. Evidence is found mainly of stabilization—the repetition of the same type of disposition—and also of escalation in dispositions. These findings provide support for the societal-reaction theory and possibly for the desert-based theory of sentencing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Agresti, A. (1990). Categorical Data Analysis, Academic Press, New York.
Bishop, D. M., and Frazier, C. E. (1992). Gender bias in juvenile justice processing: Implications of the JJDP Act. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 82: 11621–1186.
Bishop, D. M., and Frazier, C. E. (1996). Race effects in juvenile justice decision-making: Findings of a statewide analysis. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 86: 392–414.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Roth, J., and Visher, C. (eds.) (1986). Criminal Careers and ''Career Criminals,'' Vol. 1, National Research Council (U.S), Report of the Panel on Research on Criminal Careers, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Das, S., and Moitra, S. (1988). Specialization and seriousness during adult criminal careers. J. Quant. Criminol. 4: 303–345.
Boritch, H. (1992). Gender and criminal court outcomes: An historical analysis. Criminology 30: 293–325.
Bortner, M. A. (1988). Delinquency and Justice: An Age of Crisis, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Britt, C. L. (1996) The measurement of specialization and escalation in the criminal career: An alternative modeling strategy. J. Quant. Criminol. 12: 193–221.
Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics (1995). Youth Court Statistics: 1993–1994, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
Carrington, P. J., and Moyer, S. (1995). Factors affecting custodial dispositions under the Young Offenders Act. Can. J. Criminol. 37: 127–162.
Emerson, R. M. (1969). Judging Delinquents: Context and Process in Juvenile Court, Aldine, Chicago.
Farnworth, M., and Teske, R. W. (1995). Gender differences in felony court processing: Three hypotheses of disparity. Women Crim. Just. 6: 23–44.
Federal-Provincial-Territorial Task Force on Youth Justice (1996). A Reû iew of the Young Offenders Act and the Youth Justice System in Canada, Department of Justice Canada, Ottawa.
Frazier, C. E., Bishop, D. M., and Henretta, J. C. (1992). The social context of race differentials in juvenile justice dispositions. Soc. Q. 33: 447–458.
Gove, W. R. (1980). The Labelling of Deû iance: Eû aluating a Perspective, 2nd ed., Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Hagan, J. (1974). Extra-legal attributes and criminal justice: An assessment of the sociological viewpoint. Law Soc. Rev. 8: 357–383.
Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical Longitudinal Data: Log-Linear, Panel, Trend and Cohort Analysis, Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
Henretta, J. C., Frazier, C. E., and Bishop, D. M. (1986). The effect of prior case outcomes on juvenile justice decision-making. Soc. Forces 65: 554–562.
Horowitz, R., and Pottieger, A. E. (1991). Gender bias in juvenile justice handling of seriously crime-involved youths. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 28: 75–100.
Kramer, J., and Steffensmeier, D. (1993). Race and imprisonment decisions. Soc. Q. 34: 357–376.
Lattimore, P. K., Visher, C., and Linster, R. (1994). Specialization in criminal careers: Markov results for a California cohort. J. Quant. Criminol. 10: 291–316.
Lee, L. (1996). Predictors of juvenile court dispositions. J. Crime Just. 19: 149–166.
Leiber, M. J., and Jamieson, K. M. (1995). Race and decision making within juvenile justice: The importance of context. J. Quant. Criminol. 11: 363–388.
Mahoney, A. R. (1974). The effects of labeling youths in the juvenile justice system: A review of the evidence. Law Soc. Rev. 8: 583–614.
Markwart, A. (1992). Custodial sanctions under the Young Offenders Act. In Corrado, R. R., Bala, N., Linden, R., and LeBlanc, M. (eds.), Juvenile Justice in Canada, Butterworths, Toronto.
Nagin, D. S., and Farrington, D. P. (1992). The stability of criminal potential from childhood to adulthood. Criminology 30: 235–260.
Nettler, G. (1984). Explaining Crime, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, London.
Nettler, G. (1995). A critique of labeling. In Rubington, E., and Weinberg, M. S. (eds.), The Study of Social Problems: Seven Perspectives, 5th ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Phillips, C. D., and Dinitz, S. (1982). Labelling and juvenile court dispositions: Official responses to a cohort of violent juveniles. Soc. Q. 23: 267–278.
Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research (with discussion). Sociol. Methods 25: 111–195.
Roberts, J. V. (1997). The role of the criminal record in the sentencing process. In Tonry, M. (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, Vol. 17, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Rubington, E., and Weinberg, M. S. (1999). Deviance: The Interactionist Perspective, 7th ed., Macmillan, New York.
SAS Institute, Inc. (1993). SAS/STAT Software: The GENMOD Procedure, Release 6.09. SAS Technical Report P-243, SAS Institute., Cary, NC.
Shoemaker, D. J. (1996). Theories of Delinquency: An Examination of Explanations of Delinquent Behavior, 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, New York.
Stander, J., Farrington, D. P., Hill, G., and Altham, P. M. (1989). Markov chain analysis and specialization in criminal careers. Br. J. Criminol. 29: 317–335.
Sobel, M. E. (1988). Some models for the multiway contingency table with a one-to-one correspondence among categories. Sociol. Meth. 18: 165–192.
Sobel, M. E., Hout, M., and Duncan, O. D. (1985). Exchange, structure, and symmetry in occupational mobility. Am. J. Sociol. 91: 359–372.
Stander, J., Farrington, D. P., Hill, G., and Altham, P. M. (1989). Markov chain analysis and specialization in criminal careers. Br. J. Criminol. 29: 317–335.
Steffensmeier, D., Kramer, J., and Streifel, C. (1993). Gender and imprisonment decisions. Criminology 31: 411–446.
Stryker, R., Nagel, I. H., and Hagan, J. (1983). Methodological issues in court research: Pretrial release decisions for federal defendants. Soc. Methods Res. 11: 469–500.
Sweeney, L., and Craig, H. (1992). The influence of race on sentencing: A meta-analytic review of experimental studies. Behav. Sc. Law 10: 179–195.
Swigert, V. L. and Farrell, R. A. (1988). Criminal conceptions, legal process, and crime causation. In Farrell, R. A. and Swigert, V. L. (eds.), Social Deviance, 3rd ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Thornberry, T. P., and Christenson, R. L. (1984). Juvenile justice decision-making as a longitudinal process. Soc. Forces 63: 433–444.
Tittle, C. R. (1980). Labelling and crime: An empirical evaluation. In Gove, W. R. (ed.), The Labelling of Deviance: Evaluating a Perspective, 2nd ed., Sage, Beverly Hills, CA.
Wellford, C. F., and Triplett, R. A. (1993). The future of labeling theory: Foundations and promises. In Adler, F., and Laufer, W. S. (eds.), New Directions in Criminological Theory: Advances in Criminological Theory, Vol. 4., Transaction, New Brunswick, NJ.
Zatz, M. S. (1987). The changing forms of racial/ethnic biases in sentencing. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 24: 69–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matarazzo, A., Carrington, P.J. & Hiscott, R.D. The Effect of Prior Youth Court Dispositions on Current Disposition: An Application of Societal-Reaction Theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 17, 169–200 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011050030862
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011050030862