Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 347–361 | Cite as

A Theoretical Study of River Fragmentation by Dams and its Effects on White Sturgeon Populations

  • Henriette I. Jager
  • James A. Chandler
  • Kenneth B. Lepla
  • Webb Van Winkle
Article

Abstract

Most of the world's large rivers are fragmented by dams. Fragmentation of the river ecosystem alters migration patterns among fish populations and converts free-flowing river to reservoir habitat. In this study, we used an individual-based genetic metapopulation model to study the effects of fragmentation on the population viability and genetic diversity of a large-river fish, the white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus. In the first of two simulation experiments, we fragmented a 200 km river reach by building 1 to 20 virtual dams. Increased fragmentation produced an exponential decline in the likelihood of persistence, but no extinction threshold to suggest a minimum viable length of river. Compounding isolation with the loss of free-flowing habitat did not further reduce viability until free-flowing habitat was nearly eliminated, at which point extinction was certain. Genetic diversity within (among) populations decreased (increased) as we ‘built’ the first several dams. Adding more dams caused the number of persisting populations to decline and eroded genetic diversity within and among populations. Our second simulation experiment evaluated the effects of different levels of upstream and downstream migration between river segments. The results of these migration experiments highlighted the importance of balanced migration rates. We found that extinction risk was high for populations linked by high downstream, and low upstream, migration rates, as is often the case in impounded rivers. Our results support the view that migration patterns will play a significant role in determining the viability of riverine fishes, such as the white sturgeon, in river ecosystems fragmented by dams.

migration large river impoundment reservoir genetic diversity population viability analysis individual-based metapopulation model Acipenser transmontanus 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Auer, N.A. 1996a. Importance of habitat and migration to sturgeons with emphasis on lake sturgeon. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 53(Suppl. 1): 152–160.Google Scholar
  2. Auer, N.A. 1996b. Response of spawning lake sturgeons to change in hydroelectric facility operation. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 125: 66–77.Google Scholar
  3. Bartley, D.M., G.A.E. Gall & B. Bentley. 1985. Preliminary description of the genetic structure of white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus, in the Pacific Northwest. pp. 105–109. In: F.P. Binkowski & S.I. Doroshov (ed.) North American Sturgeons: Biology and Aquaculture Potential, Developments in Env. Biol. Fish. 6, Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Bascompte, J. & R.V. Sole. 1996. Habitat fragmentation and extinction thresholds in spatially explicit models. J. Anim. Ecol. 65: 465–473.Google Scholar
  5. Beamesderfer, R.C.P., T.A. Rien & A.A. Nigro. 1995. Differences in the dynamics and potential production of impounded and unimpounded white sturgeon populations in the lower Columbia River. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 124: 857–872.Google Scholar
  6. Beamesderfer, R.C.P. & R.A. Farr. 1997. Alternatives for the protection and restoration of sturgeons and their habitat. Env. Biol. Fish. 48: 407–417.Google Scholar
  7. Birstein, V.J., W.E. Bemis & J.R Waldman. 1997. The threatened status of Acipenseriform species: a summary. Env. Biol. Fish. 48: 427–435.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J.H. & A. Kodric-Brown. 1977. Turnover rates in insular biogeography: effect of immigration on extinction. Ecology 58: 445–449.Google Scholar
  9. Brown, J.R., A.T. Beckenbach & M.J. Smith. 1992a. Mitochondrial DNA length variation and heteroplasmy in populations of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus). Genetics 132: 221–228.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, J.R., A.T. Beckenbach & M.J. Smith. 1992b. Influence of Pleistocene glaciations and human intervention upon mitochondrial DNA diversity in white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) populations. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49: 358–367.Google Scholar
  11. Burkey, T.V. 1988. Extinction in nature reserves: the effect of fragmentation and the importance of migration between reserve fragments. Oikos 55: 75–81.Google Scholar
  12. Chapman, F.A., J.P.V. Eenennaam & S.I. Doroshov. 1996. The reproductive condition of white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus, in San Francisco Bay, California. U.S. Fish. Bull. 94: 628–634.Google Scholar
  13. Cochnauer, T.G. 1983. Abundance, distribution, growth and management of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) in the middle Snake River, Idaho. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow. 52 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Cochnauer, T.G., J.R. Lukens & F.E. Partridge. 1985. Status of white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus, in Idaho. pp. 127–133. In: F.P. Binkowski & S.I. Doroshov (ed.) North American Sturgeons: Biology and Aquaculture Potential, Developments in Env. Biol. Fish. 6, Dr W. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. DeVore, J.D., B.W. James, C.A. Tracy & D.A. Hale. 1995. Dynamics and potential production of white sturgeon in the unimpounded lower Columbia River. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 124: 845–856.Google Scholar
  16. Dunham, J.B. & B.E. Rieman. 1999. Metapopulation structure of bull trout: influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecol. Appl. 9: 642–655.Google Scholar
  17. Gaggiotti, O.E. & P.E. Smouse. 1996. Stochastic migration and maintenance of genetic variation in sink populations. Amer. Natur. 147: 919–945.Google Scholar
  18. Gilpin, M.E. & M.E. Soule. 1986. Minimum viable populations: processes of species extinction. pp. 19–34. In: M.E. Soule (ed.) Conservation Biology: the Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Sinauer Associates, Sutherland.Google Scholar
  19. Gotelli, N.J. & C.M. Taylor. 1999. Testing metapopulation models with stream-fish assemblages. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1: 835–845.Google Scholar
  20. Gross, M. & A.R. Kapuscinski. 1997. Reproductive success of smallmouth bass estimated and evaluated from family-specific DNA fingerprints. Ecology 78: 1424–1430.Google Scholar
  21. Grossman, G.D., J. Hill & J.T. Petty. 1995. Observations on habitat structure, population regulation, and habitat use with respect to evolutionarily significant units: a landscape perspective for lotic systems. pp. 371–380. In: J.L. Nielsen (ed.) Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.Google Scholar
  22. Hanski, I., T. Pakkala, M. Kuussaari & G. Lei. 1995. Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape. Oikos 72: 21–28.Google Scholar
  23. Hartl, D.L. & A.G. Clark. 1989. Principles of population genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland. 682 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Hernandez-Martich, J.D. & M.H. Smith. 1996. Downstream gene flow and genetic structure of Gambusia holbrooki (eastern mosquitofish) populations. Heredity 79: 295–301.Google Scholar
  25. Jager, H.I. 2000. Predicting the viability of fish populations in a modified riverine environment. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Tennessee, Knoxville. 255 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Jager, H.I., H.E. Cardwell, M.J. Sale, M.S. Bevelhimer, C.C. Coutant & W. VanWinkle. 1997. Modelling the linkages between flow management and salmon recruitment in streams. Ecol. Model. 103: 171–191.Google Scholar
  27. Kareiva, P. 1990. Population dynamics in spatially complex environments: theory and data. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London B 330: 175–190.Google Scholar
  28. Kimura, M. & T. Ohta. 1978. Stepwise mutation model and distribution of allelic frequencies in a finite population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 75: 2868–2872.Google Scholar
  29. Kohlhorst, D.W., L.W. Botsford, J.S. Brennan & G.M. Cailliet. 1989. Aspects of the structure and dynamics of an exploited Central California population of white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus). pp. 277–293. In: Acipenser, Actes du Premier Cloque International sur l'Esturgeon, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
  30. Lane, D.E. 1991. Status of the white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus, in Canada. Canadian Field Naturalist 105: 161–168.Google Scholar
  31. Li, H.W., K. Currens, D. Bottom, S. Clarke, J. Dambacher, C. Frissell, P. Harris, R.M. Hughes, D. McCullough, A. McGie, K. Moore, R. Nawa & S. Thiele. 1995. Safe havens: refuges and evolutionarily significant units. pp. 371–380. In: J.L. Nielsen (ed.) Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.Google Scholar
  32. Ludwig, D., R. Hilborn & C.J. Walters. 1993. Uncertainty, resource exploitation, and conservation: lessons from history. Science 260: 17–36.Google Scholar
  33. McCabe, G.T., Jr. & C.A. Tracy. 1994. Spawning and early life history of white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus, in the Lower Columbia River. U.S. Fish. Bull. 92: 760–772.Google Scholar
  34. McCauley, D.E. 1993. Genetic consequences of extinction and recolonization in fragmented habitats. pp. 217–233. In: P.M. Kareiva, J.G. Kingsolver & R.B. Huey (ed.) Biotic Interactions and Global Change, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  35. Nei, M. 1973. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70: 3321–3323.Google Scholar
  36. Parsley, M.J., L.G. Beckman & G.T. McCabe, Jr. 1993. Spawning and rearing habitat use by white sturgeons in the Columbia River downstream from McNary Dam. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 122: 217–227.Google Scholar
  37. Plantania, S.P. & C.S. Altenbach. 1998. Reproductive strategies and egg types of seven Rio Grande Basin cyprinids. Copeia 1998: 559–569.Google Scholar
  38. Poddubny, A.G. & D.L. Galat. 1995. Habitat associations of Upper Volga River fishes: effects of reservoirs. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11: 67–84.Google Scholar
  39. Policansky, D. & J.J. Magnuson. 1998. Genetics, metapopulations, and ecosystem management of fisheries. Ec. Appl. 8(Supplement 1), S119–S123.Google Scholar
  40. Quinn, J.F., C.L. Wolin & M.L. Judge. 1989. An experimental analysis of patch size, habitat subdivision, and extinction in a marine intertidal snail. Conserv. Biol. 3: 242–251.Google Scholar
  41. Quinn, T.P. & A.H. Dittman. 1990. Pacific salmon migrations and homing: mechanisms and adaptive significance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5: 174–177.Google Scholar
  42. Rieman, B.E. & J.D. McIntyre. 1995. Occurrence of bull trout in naturally fragmented habitat patches of varied size. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc. 124: 285–296.Google Scholar
  43. Rieman, B.E. & J.B. Dunham. 2000. Metapopulations and salmonids: a synthesis of life history patterns and empirical observations. Ecol. Fresh. Fish 9: 51–64.Google Scholar
  44. Rochard, E., G. Castelnaud & M. LePage. 1990. Sturgeons (Pisces: Acipenseridae): threats and prospects. J. Fish Biol. 37(Supplement A): 123–132.Google Scholar
  45. Schaffter, R.G. 1997. White sturgeon spawning migrations and location of spawning habitat in the Sacramento River, California. California Fish and Game 83: 1–20.Google Scholar
  46. Schlosser, I.J. & P.L. Angermeier. 1995. Spatial variation in demographic processes of lotic fishes: conceptual models, empirical evidence, and implications for conservation. pp. 392–401. In: J.L. Nielsen (ed.) Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.Google Scholar
  47. Soule, M.E. 1980. Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. pp. 151–169. In: M.E. Soule & B.A. Wilcox (ed.) Conservation Biology: an Evolutionaryecological Perspective, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.Google Scholar
  48. Tsyplakov, E.P. 1978. Migrations and distribution of the sterlet, Acipenser ruthenus, in Kuybyshev Reservoir. J. Ichth. 18: 905–912.Google Scholar
  49. Van Eenennaam, J.P., J.G. Watson, S.I. Doroshov, D.S. Moore, G.P. Moberg & J. Linares. 1996. Reproductive conditions of the Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus) in the Hudson River. stuaries 19: 769–777.Google Scholar
  50. Van Eenennaam, A.L., J.D. Murray & J.F. Medrano. 1998. Synaptonemal complex analysis in spermatocytes of white sturgeon, Acipenser transmontanus Richardson (Pisces, Acipenseridae), a fish with a very high chromosome number. Genome 41: 51–61.Google Scholar
  51. Van Winkle, W., H.I. Jager, S.F. Railsback, B.D. Holcomb, T.K. Studley & J.E. Baldrige. 1998. Individual-based model of sympatric populations of brown and rainbow trout for instream flow assessment: model description and calibration. Ecol. Model. 110: 175–207.Google Scholar
  52. Votinov, N.P. & V.P. Kas'yanov. 1978. The ecology and reproductive efficiency of the Siberian sturgeon, Acipenser baeri, in the Ob as affected by hydraulic engineering works. J. Ichth. 18: 20–29.Google Scholar
  53. Waples, R.S. 1995. Evolutionarily significant units and the conservation of biological diversity under the Endangered Species Act. pp. 8–27. In: J.L. Nielsen (ed.) Evolution and the Aquatic Ecosystem: Defining Unique Units in Population Conservation, American Fisheries Society, Bethesda.Google Scholar
  54. Welcomme, R.L. 1995. Relationships between fisheries and the integrity of river systems. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 11: 121–136.Google Scholar
  55. Whitlock, M.C. 1992. Temporal fluctuations in demographic parameters and the genetic variance among populations. Evolution 46: 608–615.Google Scholar
  56. Wright, S. 1978. Variability within and among natural populations. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 580 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henriette I. Jager
    • 1
  • James A. Chandler
    • 2
  • Kenneth B. Lepla
    • 2
  • Webb Van Winkle
    • 3
  1. 1.Environmental Sciences DivisionOak Ridge National LaboratoryOak RidgeU.S.A.
  2. 2.Aquatic Section, Environmental AffairsIdaho Power Co.BoiseU.S.A.
  3. 3.Oak Ridge National LaboratoryBoiseU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations