Skip to main content
Log in

Environmental economics of the Khangchendzonga National Park in the Sikkim Himalaya, India

  • Published:
GeoJournal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A contingent valuation survey was conducted involving local community members, domestic and foreign visitors to estimate the environmental economics of the Khangchendzonga National Park and to elicit their willingness-to-pay (WTP) for its maintenance and conservation. Using a random survey, the average WTP was US$ 8.84 for foreign visitors per visit, followed by US$ 6.20 per household per year by local community members and US$ 1.91 per domestic visitor per visit for improvement in environmental conservation. The WTP was strongly influenced by age, education and income. The present study demonstrated that the contingent valuation method (CVM) is a promising approach, however it lacks inclusion of non-monetary contributions. The WTP for environmental management by the local communities was mostly in kind or time for services. The CVM can be a useful tool for decision-makers regarding investment and policy purposes for management of biodiversity hot spots and protected areas in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow K.J., Solow R., Leamer E., Portney P., Radner R. and Schuman H., 1993: Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation. Federal Register, 58: 4601–4614.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banskota K. and Upadhyay M., 1991: Impacts of Rural Tourism on Environment, Income, and Employment: Implications for Tourism Development in the Makalu-Barun Conservation Area. Makalu-Barun Conservation Project, Kathmandu.

  • Bateman I. and Willis K. (eds), 1995: Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom J.C., Stoll J.R., Titre J.P. and Wright V.L., 1990: Economic value of wetlands-based recreation. Ecological Economics, 2: 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop R.C. and Heberlein T.A., 1992: The contingent valuation method. In: K.M. Ward and J.W. Duffield (eds), Natural Resource Damages: Law and Economics. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boo, E., 1990: Ecotourism: The Potentials and Pitfalls, Vol. 1&2. Washington, D.C., World Wildlife Fund.

  • Brookshire D., Eubanks L.S. and Randall A., 1983: Estimating option prices and existence values for wildlife resources. Land Economics, 59: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Jr. G. and Henry W., 1989: The economic value of elephants. The London Environmental Economics Center, London, Paper 89–12 (unpubl.).

  • Carson R., Flores N., Martin K. and Wright J., 1996: Contingent valuation and revealed preference methodologies: comparing the estimates for quasi-public goods. Land Economics, 72: 80–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings R.G., Brookshire D.S. and Schulze W.D. (eds), 1986: Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method. Rowman and Allanheld, Totown, NJ, 270 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond P. and Hausman J., 1994: Contingent valuation: Is some number better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J.A. and Sherman P.B., 1990: Economics of Protected Areas: A New Look at Benefits and Costs. Earthscan Publication Ltd., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon J.A., Scura L.F., Carpenter R.A. and Sherman P.B. 1994: Economic Analysis of Environmental Impacts. Earthscan, London, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman M., 1993: The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values: Theory and Method. RFF, Washington, D.C., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann M., Loomis J. and Kanninen B. 1991: Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73: 1255–1263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann W.M. 1994: Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8: 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N. and Spash C., 1993: Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Cornwall, U.K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoevenagel R. and Linden van der J.W., 1993: Effects of different descriptions of the ecological good on willingness to pay values. Ecological Economics, 7: 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoovengel R., 1994: The CV Method: Scope and Validity. Free University, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, B.E., 1982: Sagarmatha National Park: the impact of tourism on the Himalayas. Ambio, 11: 246–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karan P.P. and Mather C., 1985: Tourismand environment inMount Everest region. Geographical Review, 75: 93–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoshoo T.N., 1992: Plant Diversity in the Himalaya - Conservation and Utilization. Pandit Gobind Ballabh Pant Memorial Lecture II. G.B. Pant Institute of Himalayan Environment and Development, Almora, India.

  • Knetsch, J., 1993: Environmental Valuation: Some Practical Problems of Wrong Questions and Misleading Answers. Resource Assessment Commissions, Occasional Publication No. 5.

  • Lindberg K. and Hawkins D.E. (eds), 1993: Ecotourism: A Guide for Planners and Managers. North Bennington VT. The Ecotourism Society.

  • Majid I., Sinden J.A. and Randell A., 1983: Benefit evaluation increments to existing system of public facilities. Land Economics, 59: 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeely J.A., 1988: Economics and Biological Diversity: Developing and Using Economic Incentives to Conserve Biological Resources. IUCN, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell R.C. and Carson R.D., 1989: Using Survey to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C. 463 pp.

  • Navrud S. and Mungatana E.D., 1994: Environmental valuation in developing countries: the recreational value of wildlife viewing. Ecological Economics, 11: 135–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pawson I.G., Dennyse D., Stanford Vincanne A. Adams and Mingms Nurbu, 1984: Growth of tourism in Nepal's Everest Region: Impact on the physical environment and structure of human settlements. Mountain Research and Development, 4: 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce D., Whittington D. and Georgiou S., 1994: Economic Values and the Environment in the Developing World. A report to the UNEP.

  • Rai S.C. and Sundriyal R.C., 1997: Tourism and biodiversity conservation: The Sikkim Himalaya. Ambio, 26: 235–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Systat, 1996: Statistics. Systat 6.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc., Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaux H., Gardner P. and Mills T., 1984: Methods for Assessing the Impact of Fire on Forest Recreation. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-79. USDA Forest Service, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh R.G., 1986: Recreation Economic Decisions: Comparing Benefits and Costs. Venture Publishing Inc., State College, PA, 637 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh R.G., Johnson D.M., and Mckean J.R., 1989: Issues in nonmarket valuation: a retrospective glance. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, 14: 178–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurick D.N., 1992: Adventure travel and sustainable tourism in the peripheral economy of Nepal. Annals, Association of American Geographers, 82: 608–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maharana, I., Rai, S. & Sharma, E. Environmental economics of the Khangchendzonga National Park in the Sikkim Himalaya, India. GeoJournal 50, 329–337 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011032813319

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011032813319

Navigation