Abstract
Delamination of the adhesive bond between face sheets and cellular core of structural sandwich panels is a major problem in sandwich construction. Due to incompatibilities in the modes of deformation associated with the face sheets and the cellular core, stress concentrations and singularities can occur even in absence of cracks. These stress concentrations are assumed to govern the onset of delamination. In the present study, a mesoscale concept for a first-order assessment of the delamination hazard induced by the incompatibility in the modes of deformation at the interface between core and face sheets is presented. The approach is based on a fourth order tensor which can easily be derived from the effective elasticity tensor for the cellular core. Due to the general formulation, the concept is applicable to all types of two dimensional cellular sandwich cores irrespectively of cell geometry and loading conditions. The approach is illustrated by an analysis of three examples concerning commercial sandwich core geometries as well as a more general non-orthotropic cellular structure.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Becker, W. (1998). The inplane stiffness of a honeycomb core including the thickness effect. Archive of Applied Mechanics 68, 334–341.
Bishop, J.F.W. and Hill, R. (1951). A theory of the plastic distortion of a polycrystalline aggregate under combined stress. Philosophical Magazine 42, 414–427.
Burton, W.S. and Noor, A.K. (1997). Structural analysis of the adhesive bond in a honeycomb core sandwich panel. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 26, 213–227.
Cantwell, W.J., Scudamore, R., Ratcliffe, J. and Davies, P. (1999). Interfacial fracture in sandwich laminates. Composites Science and Technology 59, 2079–2085.
Carlsson, L.A. and Prasad, S. (1992). On facing/core debond fracture of sandwich beams. (Edited by D. Weissman-Berman and K.A. Olsson), Sandwich Construction 2. EMAS Publishing, Warley, 441–463.
Gibson, L.J., Ashby, M.F., Zhang, J. and Triantafillou, T.C. (1989). Failure surfaces for cellular materials under multiaxial loads – I. Modeling. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 31, 635–663.
Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F. (1997). Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Goswami, S. and Becker, W. (2000). Analysis of debonding fracture in a sandwich plate with hexagonal core. Composite Structures 49, 385–392.
Grediac, M. (1993). A finite element study of the transverse shear in honeycomb cores. International Journal of Solids and Structures 30, 1777–1788.
Griffith, A.A. (1921). The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A221, 163–198.
Hohe, J. and Becker, W. (1999). Effective elastic properties of triangular grid structures. Composite Structures 45, 131–145.
Hohe, J. and Becker, W. (1999). Determination of the elasticity tensor of non-orthotropic cellular sandwich cores. Technische Mechanik 19, 259–268.
Hohe, J. and Becker, W. (2001). A refined analysis of the effective elasticity tensor for general cellular sandwich cores. International Journal of Solids and Structures, in press.
Hohe, J., Becker, W. and Goswami, S. (2001). Singular stress fields in cellular cores for structural sandwich panels. Composite Structures, in press.
Kelsey, S., Gellateley, R.A. and Clark, B.W. (1958). The shear modulus of foil honeycomb cores. Aircraft Engineering 30, 294–302.
Kim, W.C. and Dharan, C.K.H. (1992). Facesheet debonding criteria for composite sandwich panels under in-plane compression. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 42, 643–652.
Ponte Castañeda, P. and Suquet, P. (1998). Nonlinear composites. Advances in Applied Mechanics 34, 171–302.
Triantafillou, T.C. and Gibson, L.J. (1989). Debonding in foam-core sandwich panels. Materials and Structures 22, 64–69.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hohe, J., Becker, W. Assessment of the delamination hazard of the core face sheet bond in structural sandwich panels. International Journal of Fracture 109, 413–432 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011028422145
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011028422145