Abstract
The paper shows that the Wigner distribution function of quantum optical coherent states, or of a superposition of such states, can be produced and measured with a classical optical set-up using classical coherent light fields. This measurement cannot be done directly in quantum optics since the quantum phase space variables correspond to non-commuting operators. As an example, the Wigner distribution function of Schrödinger cat states of light has been measured. It is also shown that the possibility of measuring the Wigner distribution function of quantum coherent states with classical coherent fields is unique in the sense that it cannot be extended to other quantum states, not even to the incoherent limit of the superposition of coherent states.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adam, G. J. Mod. Opt. 42 1311, 1995.
Bastiaans, M.J. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 69 1710, 1979.
Bastiaans, M.J. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 3 1227, 1986.
Born, M. and E. Wolf. Principles of Optics, 4th edn, ch.10. Pergamon, Oxford, 1970.
Brenner, K.-H. and A.W. Lohmann. Optics Comm. 42 310, 1982.
Brif, C., A. Mann and M. Revzen. Phys. Rev.A 57 742, 1998.
Cohen, L. Proc. IEEE 77 941, 1989.
Dragoman, D. Appl. Opt. 34 6758, 1995.
Dragoman, D. In Progress in Optics XXXVII, ed. E. Wolf, p. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1997.
Dragoman, D. and M. Dragoman. IEEE J. Selected Topics Quantum Electron. 2 181, 1996.
Dragoman, D. and M. Dragoman. Optics Comm. 137 437, 1997.
Eichmann, G. and B.Z. Dong. Appl. Opt. 21 3152, 1982.
Gerry, C.C. and P.L. Knight. Am. J. Phys. 65 964, 1997.
Giuliani, D., E. Joos, C. Kiefer, J. Kupsch and I.O. Stamatescu. Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory, p. 87 Springer, Heidelberg, 1996.
Hillery, M., R.F. O'Connell, M.O. Scully and E.P. Wigner. Phys. Rep. 106 121, 1984.
Hudson, R.L. Rep. Math. Phys. 6 249, 1974.
Kim, Y.S. and M.E. Noz. Phase Space Picture of Quantum Mechanics, World Scientific, Singapore, 1991.
Knight, P.L. In Progress in Optics XXXIV, ed. E. Wolf, p. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995.
Konno, H. and P.S. Lomdahl. J. Phys. Soc. Japan 63 3967, 1994.
Leonhardt, U. Measuring the Quantum State of Light, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
Luneburg, R.K. Mathematical Theory of Optics, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1966.
Presilla, C. “Classical behavior of a macroscopic SchroÈdinger cat”, at 4th Int. Conf. on Quantum Communication, Measurement and Computing, Evanston, USA, August 1998, e-print: cond-mat/ 9809014.
Ralph, T.C. and C.M. Savage. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 9 1895, 1992.
Scully, M.O. and S. Zubairy. Quantum Optics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998.
Wigner, E.P. Phys. Rev. 40 749, 1932.
Wolf, K.B. Optics Comm. 132 343, 1996.
Wolf, K.B. and A.L. Rivera. Optics Comm. 144 36, 1997.
Zurek, W.H. Physics Today 44 (10) 36, 1991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dragoman, D., Dragoman, M. Quantum coherent versus classical coherent light. Optical and Quantum Electronics 33, 239–252 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011007808440
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011007808440