Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic Testing and the Demand for Cancer Insurance

  • Published:
Journal of Consumer Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been an expansion of the availability of disease-specific insurance policies in the United States over the past decade. At the same time, recently developed medical tests are providing consumers with new information regarding their risk of contracting particularly serious diseases. This exploratory study makes use of data from two groups of women to examine the demand for one type of disease-specific policy, cancer insurance. Members of the first group have been tested for a BRCA1 gene mutation that is associated with an 88% risk of contracting breast and/or ovarian cancer by age 70. The other group consists of women from the general population who have not been tested for any BRCA1 gene mutation.

The study results indicate that women who have been tested for the BRCA1 gene mutation are more likely than untested respondents to have purchased cancer insurance and to have recently thought about purchasing cancer insurance. The results also indicate that older women and women who have modest household incomes are more likely to have purchased cancer insurance. Women who have minor children, who are more highly educated, who have no health insurance, who have had cancer, or who report that they are in poor health are more likely to have recently contemplated purchasing cancer insurance. Our discussion of the findings highlights several issues that merit further consideration on the part of consumer policy makers working in the area of insurance regulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Allison, P. D. (1999). Logistic regression using the SAS system: Theory and application. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Cancer Society (2000). Cancer facts and figures [Online, January 20]. Available: http:/www.cancer.org/statistics/cff99/basicfacts.html#risk.

  • American Council of Life Insurance (1991). Report of the ACLI – HIAA Task Force on Genetic Testing. Washington, DC: American Council of Life Insurance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baty, B. J., Venne, V., MacDonald, J, Croyle, R. T., Smith, K. R., & Botkin, J. R. (1997). Genetic counseling protocols for BRCA1 testing. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 6, 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezzant, E. M., & Chadwick, B. A. (1996). Education. In: T. B. Heaton, T. A. Hirschl, & B. A. Chadwick (Eds.), Utah in the 1990s – A demographic perspective, pp. 119–138. Salt Lake City, UT: Signature Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, J. R., Croyle, R. T., Smith, K. R., Baty, B. J., Lerman, C., Goldgar, D. E., Ward, J. M., Flick, B. J., & Nash, J. E. (1996). A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychosocial effects of BRCA1 testing. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 88, 872–882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, B. (1998). Critical issues, developing answers – Interview with Donald C. Chambers. Best's Review – Life-Health Insurance Edition, 12, 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cancer insurance is back, but consumer groups say it's still a bad deal (1998). Salt Lake Tribune, December 24, p. A 7.

  • Cancer insurance making a comeback despite concerns (1999). Fox Market Wire [Online, September 15]. Available: http://www.foxmarketwire.com/wires/1223/ f_ap_1223_17.sml.

  • Cropper, C. M. (1997). When the policy covers only one disease. The New York Times, April 20, p. F-8.

  • Giese, W. (1997). Insurance you can do without: Save your money for coverage you really need. Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine, 51(2), 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, J. D., Houston, D. B., & Melander, E. B. (1967). Determinants of household life insurance premium expenditures: An empirical investigation. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 34, 397–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hann, L.W. (1999). Insurers see good prognosis for cancer policies. BestWire, July 19. A.M. Best Company.

  • Hay & Associates (2000). Cancer insurance policy details [Online, July 9]. Available: http://www.cancerinsurance.com.

  • Hoy, M. & Polborn, M. (2000). The value of genetic information in the life insurance market. Journal of Public Economics, 78, 235–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koco, L. (1994). Provident sees potential in voluntary cancer insurance. National Underwriter, Life & Health/Financial Services Edition, 42, October 17, p. 21.

  • Koco, L. (1999). Worksite products target lost costs, critical illness cover. National Underwriter [Online, July 19]. Available: http://www.nunews.com/archives.

  • Lewis, F. D. (1989). Dependents and the demand for life insurance. American Economic Review, 79, 452–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaw, K. T., Moy, R. L., & Chuang, J. (1994). The demand for life insurance in the United States: Long-run versus short-run. Journal of Insurance Issues, 17, 73–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehr, R. I., & Gustavson, S. G. (1984). Life insurance: Theory and practice. Plano, TX: Business Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. N. (1996).Insurance for cancer: Gambling on illness. Indianapolis Business Journal, January 15–21, p. A-18.

  • Nance-Nash, S. (1993). Insurance you don't need: Dropping policies like these could cut your premium costs by 10%. Money, July, pp. 78–79.

  • Norman Wyatt Insurance Agency, Inc. (1997). First diagnosis cash benefit cancer plan [Online, November 2]. Available: http://www.netramp.net/nwyatt/cancer.htm.

  • Panko, R. (1998). Making the case for specified-disease products. Best's Review, 99(3), 86–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokorski, R. J. (1994). Use of genetic information by private insurers. In: T. F. Murphy & M. A. Lappe (Eds.), Justice and the human genome project, pp. 91–110. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokorski, R. J. (1997). Insurance underwriting in the genetic era. American Journal of Human Genetics, 60, 205–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Showers, V. E., & Shotick, J. A. (1994). The effects of household characteristics on demand for insurance: A tobit analysis. Journal of Risk and Insurance,61, 492–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • State of Wisconsin, Office of the Commissioner of Insurance (1999). A shopper's guide to cancer insurance [Online]. Available: http://www.state/wi/us/agencies/oci/ pub_list/pi-001.htm.

  • Subramanian, K., Lemaire, J., Hershey, J. C., Pauly, M. V., Armstrong, K., & Asch, D. A. (1999). Estimating adverse selection costs from genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer: The case of life insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 66, 531–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Bureau of the Census (1998). Statistical abstract of the United States (118th edition). Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utah State Department of Health (1996). Utah's 1996 health status survey codebook. Salt Lake City, UT: Bureau of Surveillance and Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varian, H.R. (1992). Microeconomic analysis. Third ed. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weagley, R. O., & Taylor, J. G. (1992). The life of the wife: The demand for life insurance. Proceedings of the American Council on Consumer Interests, 38, 147–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zick, C. D., Smith, K. R., Mayer, R. N., & Botkin, J.R. (2000). Genetic testing, adverse selection, and the demand for life insurance. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 93, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, R.B., Zick, C.D., Mayer, R.N. et al. Genetic Testing and the Demand for Cancer Insurance. Journal of Consumer Policy 24, 1–21 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010987110208

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010987110208

Keywords

Navigation