Skip to main content
Log in

Emerging Attributes of Pedagogy and Curriculum for the “New World Order”

  • Published:
Innovative Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article is a conceptual one designed to start dialogue on educational issues that are unfolding amidst the changes in other sectors of our society such as production, services, and recreation. We first present an overview of the fundamental but profound changes evidenced in our society and then discuss the nature of these changes and their impact on human ability to function effectively within such an environment. In light of the complexities such as uncertainties and dualistic/multiple perspectives and incongruities, we propose that a model for pedagogy and curriculum development should adopt critical thinking as the key attribute—because it has the potential to deliver an education system for the “new world order.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carmichael, L. (1992). Australian vocational certificate training system. Employment and Skills Formation Council, NBEET. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, S., & Markus, H. (1991). Possible selves across the life span. Human Development, 34, 230–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delors, J. (1996). Learning: The treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. (1946). Concept of the corporation. New York: John Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., Brooker, R., Macpherson, I., & McInman, A. (in press). Curriculum as mediated action. Teachers and Teaching.

  • Frerie, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herter and Herter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1993). Quality, science and the lifeworld: The alignment of business and education. Critical Forum, 2, 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P., Hull, G., & Lankshear, C. (1996). The new work order: Behind the language of the new capitalism. St Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). The third way. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilamel, G., & Prahalad, C. (1994). Competing for the future. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K. (1994). Out of control: The new biology of machines, social systems, and the economic world. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1975). The courage to create. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, E. (Chair). (1992). Employment related key competencies: A proposal for consultation. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In J. Mezirow and Associates, (Eds.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 1–20). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, A. (1995). The knowledge creating company. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pea, R. D. (1993). Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In G. Salomon, (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 47–87). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. J. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. W. Chickering, (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 76–116). San Francisco: Jossey-Boss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. (1992). The work of nations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, P. (1998). Socio-cultural pedagogy for new times: Reframing key concepts. The Australian Education Researcher, 25, 83–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, D. (1983). Marx's method: Ideology, science and critique in capital. Sussex, England: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. A. (1993). Comparisons of beliefs about the nature of knowledge and learning among postsecondary students. Research in Higher Education, 34, 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, R. J., & Jeheng, J. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix and R. Spiro, (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology (pp. 163–205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starkey, K. (Ed.). (1996). How organisations learn. London: International Thompson Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking disposition: From transmission to enculturation. Theory into Practice, 32, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of the higher order psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (originally published, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pillay, H., Elliott, B. Emerging Attributes of Pedagogy and Curriculum for the “New World Order”. Innovative Higher Education 26, 7–22 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010982303618

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010982303618

Navigation