Skip to main content
Log in

Contingent Derivatives of Implicit (Multi-) Functions and Stationary Points

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For an implicit multifunction Φ(p) defined by the generally nonsmooth equation F(x,p)=0, contingent derivative formulas are derived, being similar to the formula Φ′=−F x −1 F p in the standard implicit function theorem for smooth F and Φ. This will be applied to the projection X(p)={x∣∃y: (x,y)∈Φ(p)} of the solution set Φ(p) of the system F(x,y,p)=0 onto the x-space. In particular settings, X(p) may be interpreted as stationary solution sets. We discuss in detail the situation in which X(p) arises from the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker system of a nonlinear program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.–P. Aubin and I. Ekeland, Applied Nonlinear Analysis (Wiley, New York, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.–P. Aubin and H. Frankowska, Set–Valued Analysis (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.F. Bonnans and A. Shapiro, Optimization problems with perturbations: A guided tour, SIAM Review 40 (1998) 228–264.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.F. Bonnans and A. Shapiro, Perturbation Analysis of Optimization Problems (Springer, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Dontchev and R.T. Rockafellar, Characterizations of strong regularity for variational inequalities over polyhedral convex sets, SIAM Journal on Optimization 6 (1996) 1087–1105.

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Dontchev and R.T. Rockafellar, Characterizations of Lipschitz stability in nonlinear programming, in: Mathematical Programming with Data Perturbations, ed. A.V. Fiacco (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997) pp. 65–82.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A.V. Fiacco, Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear programming using penalty functions, Mathematical Programming 10 (1976) 287–311.

    Google Scholar 

  8. A.V. Fiacco and G.P. McCormick, Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques (Wiley, New York, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Gauvin and R. Janin, Directional behaviour of optimal solutions in nonlinear mathematical programming, Math. Oper. Res. 13 (1988) 629–649.

    Google Scholar 

  10. D. Klatte, Upper Lipschitz behavior of solutions to perturbed C 1,1 programs, Mathematical Programming 88 (2000) 285–311.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D. Klatte and B. Kummer, Generalized Kojima functions and Lipschitz stability of critical points, Computational Optimization and Applications 13 (1999) 61–85.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kojima, Strongly stable stationary solutions on nonlinear programs, in: Analysis and Computation of Fixed Points, ed. S.M. Robinson (Academic Press, New York, 1980) pp. 93–138.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Kummer, Lipschitzian inverse functions, directional derivatives and application in C 1,1–optimization, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 70 (1991) 559–580.

    Google Scholar 

  14. B. Kummer, An implicit function theorem for C 0,1–equations and parametric C 1,1–optimization, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 158 (1991) 35–46.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Kummer, Lipschitzian and pseudo–Lipschitzian inverse functions and applications to nonlinear programming, in: Mathematical Programming with Data Perturbations, ed. A.V. Fiacco (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1997) pp. 201–222.

    Google Scholar 

  16. B. Kummer, Metric regularity: Characterizations, nonsmooth variations and successive approximation, Optimization 46 (1999) 247–281.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A.B. Levy, Implicit multifunction theorems for the sensitivity analysis of variational conditions, Mathematical Programming 74 (1996) 333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A.B. Levy and R.T. Rockafellar, Sensitivity analysis of solutions to generalized equations, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 345 (1994) 661–671.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A.B. Levy and R.T. Rockafellar, Sensitivity analysis of solutions in nonlinear programming, in: Recent Advances in Nonsmooth Optimization, eds. D.–Z. Du, L. Qi and R.S.Womersley (World Scientific, 1995) pp. 215–223.

  20. A.B. Levy and R.T. Rockafellar, Variational conditions and the proto–differentiation of partial subgradient mappings, Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications 26 (1996) 1951–1964.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J.–S. Pang, A degree–theoretic approach to parametric nonsmooth equations with multivalued perturbed solution sets, Mathematical Programming 62 (1993) 359–383.

    Google Scholar 

  22. R.A. Poliquin and R.T. Rockafellar, Proto–derivative formulas for basic subgradient mappings in mathematical programming, Set–Valued Analysis 2 (1994) 275–290.

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Ralph and S. Dempe, Directional derivatives of the solution of a parametric nonlinear program, Mathematical Programming 70 (1995) 159–172.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S.M. Robinson, Strongly regular generalized equations, Mathematics of Operations Research 5 (1980) 43–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. S.M. Robinson, Some continuity properties of polyhedral multifunctions, Mathematical Programming Study 14 (1981) 206–214.

    Google Scholar 

  26. S.M. Robinson, An implicit–function theorem for a class of nonsmooth functions, Mathematics of Operations Research 16 (1991) 292–309.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R.T. Rockafellar and R.J.–B. Wets, Variational Analysis (Springer, Berlin, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Shapiro, Sensitivity analysis of nonlinear programs and differentiability properties of metric projections, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 26 (1988) 628–645.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Klatte, D., Kummer, B. Contingent Derivatives of Implicit (Multi-) Functions and Stationary Points. Annals of Operations Research 101, 313–331 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010957515360

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010957515360

Navigation