Abstract
This paper uses attitudes towards the third sector in Sweden to test general assumptions about how citizens in West European political systems apply ideological schemas as shortcuts to political preferences. Attitudes towards the third sector are found to be affected by all ideological schemas reflected in the Swedish party system (state-market, Christian traditionalism, and growth-ecology). Contrary to what is implied by findings from America, these effects are very stable across socio-economic groups (especially those of the dominant state-market schema). Similarly, no interaction effects of political sophistication could be traced, and the relative impact of the schemas remains the same regardless of whether or not the third sector is presented as an alternative to the welfare state. The implications of these findings for the nature of public opinion formation in ideologically clear and structured political systems are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aardal, B., Jenssen, A.T., Oscarsson, H., Sänkiaho, R. & Säynässalo, E. (1998), Can ideology explain the EU-vote?, in A.T. Jenssen, P. Pesonen & M. Gilljam (eds.), To join or not to join, pp. 235–265. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
Asp, K. (1990), Medierna och valrörelsen, in M. Gilljam & S. Holmberg (eds.), Rött, blått, grönt. En bok om 1988 års riksdagsval, pp. 44–83. Stockholm: Bonniers.
Bartels, L.M. (1996), Uninformed votes: Information effects in presidential elections, American Journal of Political Science 40: 194–230.
Bennulf, M. (1994), Miljöopinionen i Sverige. Lund: Dialogos.
Bennulf, M. (1995), Sweden: The rise and fall of miljöpartiet de gröna, in D. Richardson & Ch. Rootes (eds.), The Green challange: The development of Green Parties in Europe, pp. 128–145. London: Routledge.
Bennulf, M. (1999), Medborgarna och den hållbara utvecklingen, in S. Holmberg & L Weibull (eds.), Ljusnande framtid. Göteborgs Universitet: SOM-institutet, SOM-Rapport 22.
Bennulf, M. & Holmberg, S. (1990), The green breakthrough in Sweden, Scandinavian Political Studies 13: 165–184.
Billis, D. & Glennerster, H. (1998), Human services and the voluntary sector: Towards a theory of comparative advantage, Journal of Social Policy 27: 79–98.
Boli, J. (1991), Sweden: Is there a viable third sector?, in R. Wuthnow (ed.), Between states and markets: The voluntary sector in comparative perspective, pp. 194–234. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
van der Brug, W. & van der Eijk, C. (1999), The cognitive basis of voting, in H. Schmitt & J. Thomassen (eds.), Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union, pp. 129–160. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Budge, I., Crewe, I. & Farlie, D. (eds.) (1976), Party identification and beyond. London: John Wiley & Sons.
Carmines, E.G. & Stimson, J.A. (1980), The two faces of issue voting, American Political Science Review 74: 78–91.
Chong, D. (1993), How people think, reason and feel about rights and liberties, American Journal of Political Science 37: 867–899.
Chong, D. (1996), Creating common frames of reference on political issues, in D.C. Mutz, P.M. Sniderman & R.A. Brody (eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change, pp. 195–224. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Conover, P.J. & Feldman, S. (1984), How people organize the political world: A schematic model, American Journal of Political Science 28: 95–126.
Converse, Ph.E. (1964), The nature of belief systems in mass publics, in D.E. Apter (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, pp. 206–261. New York: Free Press.
Dalton, R.J., Flanagan, S.C. & Beck, P.A. (eds.) (1984), Electoral change in advanced industrial democracies. Realignment or dealignment? Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dalton, R.J. & Wattenberg, M.P. (1993), The not so simple act of voting, in A.W. Finifter (ed.), Political science. The state of the discipline, II, pp. 193–218. Washington, DC: APSA.
Delli Carpini, M. & Keeter, S. (1996), What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Diamond, G.A. & Cobb, M.D. (1996), The candidate as a catastrophe: Latitude theory and the problems of political persuasion, in D.C. Mutz, P.M. Sniderman & R.A. Brody (eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change, pp. 225–247. Ann Arbor MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Downs, A. (1957), An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper&Row.
Dunleavy, P. (1979), The urban basis of political alignment: Social class, domestic property ownership and state intervention in consumption processes, British Journal of Political Science 9: 409–443.
Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (eds.) (1993), The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
van der Eijk, C. & Franklin, M.N. (eds.) (1996), Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
van der Eijk, C., Franklin, M.N. & Oppenhuis, E. (1996), The strategic context: Party choice, in C. van der Eijk & M.N. Franklin (eds.), Choosing Europe? The European electorate and national politics in the face of union, pp. 332–365. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Esaiasson, P. & Holmberg, S. (1996), Representation from above. Members of parliament and representative democracy in Sweden. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990), The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Feldman, S. (1995), Answering survey questions: The measurement and meaning of public opinion, in M. Lodge & K. McGraw (eds.), Political judgment: Structure and process, pp. 247–270. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Ferejohn, J.A. & Kuklinski, J.H. (eds.) (1990), Information and democratic processes. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Fiske, S.T. (1986), Schema-based versus piecemeal politics: A patchwork quilt, but not a blanket, of evidence, in R.R. Lau & D.O. Sears (eds.), Political cognition, pp. 41–53. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Franklin, M.N., Mackie, T. & Valen, H. (eds.) (1992), Electoral change. Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in western countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fuchs, D. & Klingemann, H.-D. (1989), The left-right schema, in M.K. Jennings & J.W. van Deth (eds.), Continuities in political action. A longitudinal study of political orientations in three western democracies, pp. 203–234. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter and Co.
Gamson, W.A. (1992), Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gastil, J. & Dillard, J.P. (1999), Increasing political sophistication through public deliberation, Political Communication16: 3–23.
Gidron, B., Kramer, R.M. & Salamon, L.M. (eds.) (1992), Government and the third sector. Emerging relationships in welfare states. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Gilljam, M. & Holmberg, S. (eds.) (1990), Rött, blått, grönt. En bok om 1988 års riksdagsval. Stockholm: Bonniers.
Gilljam, M. & Holmberg, S. (1993), Väljarna inför 1990-talet. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Gilljam, M. & Holmberg, S. (1995), Väljarnas val. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Goren, P. (2001), Core principles and policy reasoning in mass publics: A test of two theories, British Journals of Political Science31: 159–177.
Granberg, D. (1993), Political perception, in S. Iyengar & W.J. McGuire (eds.), Explorations in political psychology, pp. 70–112. London: Duke University Press.
Granberg, D. & Holmberg, S. (1988), The political system matters. Social psychology and voting behavior in Sweden and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Granberg, D. & Holmberg, S. (1990), The Berelson paradox reconsidered: Intention-behavior changers in US and Swedish election campaigns, Public Opinion Quarterly 54: 530–550.
Granberg, D. & Holmberg, S. (1996), Attitude constraint and stability among elite and mass in Sweden, European Journal of Political Research 29: 59–72.
Green, D. Ph. (1988), Self-interest, public opinion and mass political behavior. Doctoral Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.
Green, D. Ph. (1992), The price elasticity of mass preferences, American Political Science Review 86: 128–148.
Green, D. Ph. & Shapiro, I. (1994), Pathologies of rational choice theories: A critique of applications in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hamill, R. & Lodge, M. (1986), Cognitive consequences of political sophistication, in R.R. Lau & D.O. Sears (eds.), Political cognition, pp. 69–93. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hofstetter, R.C., Barker, D., Smith, J.T., Zari, G.M. & Ingrassia, Th.A. (1999), Information, misinformation, and political talk radio, Political Research Quarterly 52: 353–369.
Holmberg, S. (1981), Svenska väljare. Stockholm: Liber.
Holmberg, S. & Weibull, L. (eds.) (1997), Trends in Swedish opinion. Göteborg: The SOM Institute, Göteborg University.
Hosmer, D.W. & Lemeshow, S. (1989), Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Huckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W. & Sprague, J. (1999), Accessibility and the political utility of partisan and ideological orientations, American Journal of Political Science 43: 888–911.
Inglehart, R. (1977), The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. (1981), Postmaterialism in an environment of insecurity, American Political Science Review 75: 880–900.
Inglehart, R. (1990), Cultural shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Inglehart, R. & Klingemann, H.-D. (1976), Party identification, ideological preference, and the left-right dimension among western mass publics, in I. Budge, I. Crewe & D. Farlie (eds.), Party identification and beyond, pp. 243–273. London: John Wiley.
Iyengar, S. (1991), Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Iyengar, S. & Kinder, D.R. (1987), News that matter: Television and American opinion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, N., Jenkinson, S., Kendall, I., Bradshaw, Y. & Blackmore, M. (1998), Human services and the voluntary sector: Towards a theory of comparative advantage, Journal of Social Policy 27: 307–328.
Kinder, D.R. (1998), Communication and opinion, Annual Review of Political Science 1: 167–197.
Klaussen, K.K. & Selle, P. (1996), The third sector in Scandinavia, Voluntas 7: 99–122.
Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R.I. & Budge, I. (1994), Parties, policies, and democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Knutsen, O. (1995), Value orientations, political conflicts and left-right identification: A comparative study, European Journal of Political Research 28: 63–93.
Knutsen, O. (1998), Europeans move towards the Center: A comparative longitudinal study of left-right self-placement in Western Europe, International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10: 292–316.
Knutsen, O. (1999), Left-right party polarization among the mass publics: A comparative longitudinal study from eight West European countries, in H.M. Narud & T. Aalberg (eds.), Challanges to representative democracy. Parties, voters and public opinion, pp. 229–277. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
Korpi, W. (1983), The democratic class struggle. London: Routledge.
Kuklinski, J.H., Luskin, R.C. & Bolland, J. (1991), Where is the schema? Going beyond the ‘s’ word in political psychology, American Political Science Review 85: 1341–1356.
Kumlin, S. (1997), Folket och högervågen: Om opinionsbildning, samhällsstrukturer och ideologisk förändring i 1980-talets Sverige, Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift 100: 411–440.
Lau, R.R. (1989), Construct accessibility and electoral choice, Political Behavior 11: 5–32.
Lau, R.R. & Sears, D.O. (eds.) (1986), Political Cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lipset, S.M. & Rokkan, S. (eds.) (1967), Party systems and voter alignments. New York: The Free Press.
Lipsky, M. (1980), Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Listhaug, O. (1995), Komparativ offentlig opinion i Europa, Tidskrift für samfunnsforskning 36: 583–614.
Lodge, M. & McGraw, K.M. (eds.) (1995), Political judgment:Structure and process. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Lodge, M., McGraw, K.M. & Stroh, P. (1989), An impression-driven model of candidate evaluation, American Political Science Review 83: 399–419.
Lodge, M. & Stroh, P. (1993), Inside the mental voting booth: An impression-driven process model of candidate evaluation, in S. Iyengar & W.J. McGuire (eds.), Explorations in political psychology, pp. 225–263. Durham: Duke University Press.
Lundström, T. & Wijkström, F. (1997), The nonprofit sector in Sweden. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lupia, A. (1994), Shortcuts versus encyklopedias: Information and voting behavior in California insurance reform elections, American Political Science Review 88: 63–76.
Luskin, R.C. (1987), Measuring political sophistication, American Journal of Political Science 31: 857–889.
Luskin, R.C. (1990), Explaining political sophistication, Political Behavior 12: 331–361.
Miller, J.M. & Krosnick, J.A. (1996), ‘News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: A program of research on the priming hypothesis’, in D.C. Mutz, P.M. Sniderman & R.A. Brody (eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change, pp. 79–99. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Mutz, D.C., Sniderman, P.M. & Brody, R.A. (eds.) (1996), Political persuasion and attitude change. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Möller, T. (1999), The Swedish election 1998: A protest vote and the birth of a new political landscape, Scandinavian Political Studies 22: 261–276.
Nas, M. (1995), Green, greener, greenest, in J.W. van Deth & E. Scarbrough (eds.), The impact of values, pp. 273–300. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Niemi, R.G. & Westholm, A. (1984), Issues, parties, and attitudinal stability: A comparative study of Sweden and the United States, Electoral Studies 3: 65–83.
Oppenhuis, E. (1995), Voting behavior in Europe: A comparative analysis of electoral participation and party choice. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
Oscarsson, H. (1998), Den svenska partirymden. Väljarnas uppfattningar av konfliktstrukturen i partisystemet 1956–1996. Göteborg University: Department of Political Science.
Oscarsson, H. (1999), Protestval med rekordlågt deltagande. Analys av riksdagsvalet 1998, in Nationalencyklopedins årsbok 1998, pp. 200–203. Band 23. Stockholm: Bra Böcker.
Oskarson, M. (1992), Sweden, in M.N. Franklin, T. Mackie & H. Valen (eds.), Electoral change. Responses to evolving social and attitudinal structures in western countries, pp. 339–361. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Oskarson, M. (1994), Klassröstning i Sverige. Rationalitet, lojalitet eller bara slentrian. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santerus.
Pappi, F.U. (1996), Political behavior: Reasoning voters and multi-party systems, in R.E. Goodin & H-D. Klingemann (eds.), A new handbook of political science, pp. 255–275. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Petersson, O. (1977), Väljarna och valet 1976. Stockholm: Statistiska centralbyrån.
Popkin, S.L. (1991), The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rothstein, B. (1992), Den korporativa staten. Intresseorganisationer och statsförvaltning i svensk politik. Stockholm: Norstedts.
Rothstein, B. (1998), Just institutions matter. The moral and political logic of the universal welfare state. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salamon, L.M. & Anheier, H.K. (eds.) (1997), Defining the nonprofit sector. A cross-sectional analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Sapiro, V. & Soss, J. (1999), Spectacular politics, dramatic interpretations: Multiple meanings in the Thomas/Hill hearings, Political Communication 16: 285–314.
Scarbrough, E. (1995), Materialist post-materialist value orientations, in J.W. van Deth & E. Scarbrough (eds.), The impact of values, pp. 123–159. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schank, R.C. & Abelson, R.P. (1977), Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum.
Schmitt, H. & Thomassen, J. (1999), Distinctiveness and cohesion of parties, in H. Schmitt & J. Thomassen (eds.), Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union, pp. 111–128. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sears, D.O. (1993), Symbolic politics: A socio-psychological theory, in S. Iyengar & W.J. McGuire eds), Explorations in political psychology, pp. 113–149. Durham: Duke University Press.
Sears, D.O. & Funk. C.L. (1991), The role of self-interest in social and political attitudes, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology24: 1–91.
Sears, D.O., Lau, R.R., Tyler, T.R. & Allen Jr, H.M. (1980), Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting, American Political Science Review 74: 670–684.
Sniderman, P.M. (1993), The new look in public opinion research, in A.W. Finifter (ed.), Political science: The state of the discipline, II, pp. 219–245. Washington, DC: The American Political Science Association.
Sniderman, P.M., Brody, R.A. & Tetlock, Ph.E. (eds.) (1991), Reasoning and choice: Explorations in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Srull, Th. & Wyer, R. (1979), The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 1660–1672.
Svallfors, S. (1996), Välfärdsstatens moraliska ekonomi. Välfärdsopinionen i 90-talets Sverige. Umeå: Boréa.
Särlvik, B. (1970), Electoral behavior in the Swedish multiparty system. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Political Science, Göteborg University, Sweden.
Särlvik, B. (1974), Sweden: The social bases of the parties in a developmental perspective, in R. Rose (ed.), Electoral behavior: A comparative handbook, pp. 371–434. New York: Free Press.
Thomassen, J. (1999), Political communication between political elites and mass publics: The role of belief systems, in W.E. Miller, R. Pierce, J. Thomasson, R. Herrera, S. Holmberg, P. Esaiasson & B. Wessels (eds.), Policy representation in western democracies, pp. 33–58. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Valentino, N.A. (1999), Priming of racial attitudes, Public Opinion Quarterly 63: 293–320.
Wattenberg, M.P. (1990), The decline of American political parties 1952–1988.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
vanWijnen, P. (2000), Policy voting in advanced industrial democracies. The case of the Netherlands 1971–1998. Paper presented at the TMR Winter School in Comparative Electoral Research, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Wyer, R.S. & Ottati, V.C. (1993), Political information processing, in S. Iyengar & W.J. McGuire (eds.), Explorations in political psychology, pp. 225–263. Durham: Duke University Press.
Zaller, J.R. (1992), The Nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zaller, J.R. (1996), The myth of massive media impact revived: New support for a discredited idea, in D.C. Mutz, P.M. Sniderman & R.A. Brody (eds.), Political persuasion and attitude change, pp. 17–78. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumlin, S. Ideology-driven opinion formation in Europe: The case of attitudes towards the third sector in Sweden. European Journal of Political Research 39, 487–518 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010842817029
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010842817029