Facilitated Communication Since 1995: A Review of Published Studies

Abstract

Previous reviews of Facilitated Communication (FC) studies have clearly established that proponents' claims are largely unsubstantiated and that using FC as an intervention for communicatively impaired or noncommunicative individuals is not recommended. However, while FC is less prominent than in the recent past, investigations of the technique's efficacy continue. This review examines published FC studies since the previous major reviews by Jacobson, Mulick, and Schwartz (1995) and Simpson and Myles (1995a). Findings support the conclusions of previous reviews. Furthermore, this review critiques and discounts the claims of two studies purporting to offer empirical evidence of FC efficacy using control procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES 2

  1. Ackerson, S. (1994). Facilitated communication: A communication breakthrough or breakdown? Beyond Behavior, 5, 13-16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1986). Review of developments in metaanalytic method. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 388-399.

    Google Scholar 

  3. *Bebko, J. M., Perry, A., & Bryson, S. (1996). Multiple method validation study of facilitated communication: II. Individual differences and subgroups results. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 19-42.

    Google Scholar 

  4. *Beck, A. R., & Pirovano, C. M. (1996). Facilitated communicators' performance on a task of receptive language. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 497-512.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Beukelman, D. R. (1993). AAC research: A multidimensional learning community. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 9, 63-68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Biklen, D. (1990). Communication unbound: Autism and praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 291-314.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biklen, D. (1992). Autism orthodoxy versus free speech: A reply to Cummins and Prior. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 242-256.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biklen, D. (1993). Communication unbound. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Biklen, D., & Cardinal, D. N. (Eds.). (1997). Contested words, contested science: Unraveling the facilitated communication controversy. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Biklen, D., & Duchan, J. F. (1994). “I am intelligent:” The social construction of mental retardation. Journal of the Association for People with Severe Handicaps, 19, 173-184.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Biklen, D., & Schubert, A. (1991). New words: The communication of students with autism. Remedial and Special Education, 12, 46-57.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Biklen, D., Morton, M. W., Gold, D., Berrigan, C., & Swaminathan, S. (1992). Facilitated communication: Implications for individuals with autism. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 1-28. †Biklen, D., Saha, N., & Kliewer, C. (1995). How teachers confirm the authorship of facilitated communication: A portfolio approach. Journal of the Association for People with Severe Handicaps, 20, 45-56.

    Google Scholar 

  13. *Bomba, C., O'Donnell, L., Markowitz, C., & Holmes, D. L. (1996). Evaluating the impact of facilitated communication on the communicative competence of fourteen students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 43-58.

    Google Scholar 

  14. *Braman, B. J., Brady, M. P., Linehan, S. L., & Williams, R. E. (1995). Facilitated communication for children with autism: An examination of face validity. Behavioral Disorders, 21, 110-119.

    Google Scholar 

  15. *Calculator, S. N., & Hatch, E. R. (1995). Validation of facilitated communication: A case study and beyond. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 4, 49-58.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  17. *Cardinal, D. N., Hanson, D., & Wakeham, J. (1996). Investigation of authorship in facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34, 231-242.

    Google Scholar 

  18. †Clarkson, G. (1994). Creative music therapy and facilitated communication: New ways of reaching students with autism. Preventing School Failure, 28, 31-33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cooper, H. M. (1982). Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of Educational Research, 52, 291-302.

    Google Scholar 

  20. *Crews, W. D., Sanders, E. C., Hensley, L. G., Johnson, Y. M., Bonaventura, S., Rhodes, R. D., & Garren, M. P. (1995). An evaluation of facilitated communication in a group of nonverbal individuals with mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 205-213.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Crossley, R. (1992). Getting the words out: Case studies in facilitated communication training. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 46-59.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Crossley, R., & Remington-Gurney, J. (1992). Getting the words out: Facilitated communication training. Topics in Language Disorders,12, 29-45.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cummins, R. A., & Prior, M. P. (1992). Autism and assisted communication: A response to Biklen. Harvard Educational Review, 62, 228-241.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Danforth, S. (1997). On what basis hope? Modern progress and postmodern possibilities. Mental Retardation, 35, 93-106.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Donnellan, A. M., Sabin, L. A., & Majure, L. A. (1992). Facilitated communication: Beyond the quandary to the questions. Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 69-82.

    Google Scholar 

  26. *Edelson, S. M., Rimland, B., Berger, C. L., & Billings, D. (1998). Evaluation of a mechanical hand-support for facilitated communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 153-157.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ferguson, D. L., & Horner, R. H. (1994). Negotiating the facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 32, 305-307.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frankael, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (1999). How to design and evaluate research in education (4th edition). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gall, J. P., Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (1999). Applying Educational Research: A Practical Guide (8th edition). New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Goode, D. (1994). Defining facilitated communication in and out of existence: Role of science in the facilitated communication controversy. Mental Retardation, 32, 307-311.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gorman, B. J. (1998). Facilitated communication in America: Eight years and counting. Skeptic, 6, 64-71.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gorman, B. J. (1999). Facilitated communication: Rejected in science, accepted in court: A case study and analysis of the use of FC evidence under Frye and Daubert. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 17, 517-541.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Green, G. (1992, October). Facilitated communication: Scientific and ethical issues. Paper presented at the E. K. Shriver Center University affiliated Program Service-Related research Colloquium Series, Waltham, MA.

  35. Green, G. (1994). The quality of the evidence. In H. C. Shane, (Ed.) Facilitated communication: The clinical and social phenomenon (pp. 157-226). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Green, G., & Shane, H. C. (1994). Science, reason, and facilitated communication. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 19, 151-172.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Halle, J. W. (1994). A dispassionate (if that's possible) observer's perspective. Mental Retardation, 32, 311-314.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Harris, S. L. (1995). Educational strategies in autism. In E. Schopler and G. B. Mesibov (Eds.), Learning and cognition in autism (pp. 293-305). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Haskew, P., & Donnellan, A. M. (1993). Emotional maturity and well-being: Psychological lessons of facilitated communication, Madison, WI: DRI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. *Heckler. S (1994). Facilitated communication: A response by child protection. Child Abuse and Neglect, 18, 495-503.

    Google Scholar 

  41. *Hirshoren, A., & Gregory, J. (1995). Further negative findings of facilitated communication. Psychology in the Schools, 32, 109-113.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hitzing, W. (1994). Reply to Levine et al.'s “Plea to professionals.” Mental Retardation, 32, 314-317.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Horner, R. H. (1994). Facilitated communication: Keeping it practical. Journal of the Association for People with Severe Handicaps, 19, 185-186.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hudson, A. (1995). Disability and facilitated communication: A critique. In T. H. Ollendick and R. J. Prinz (Eds.), Advances in clinical psychology, vol. 17 (pp. 59-83). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jacobson, J. W., Eberlin, M., Mulick, J. A., Schwartz, A. A., Szempruch, J., & Wheeler, D. L. (1994). Autism and facilitated communication: Future directions. In J. L. Matson (Ed.), Autism in children and adults: Etiology, diagnosis, and treatment (pp. 59-83). Pacific grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Jacobson, J. W., & Mulick, J. A. (1994). Facilitated communication: Better education through applied ideology. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 93-105.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1995). A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and antiscience. American Psychologist, 50, 750-765.

    Google Scholar 

  48. †Janzen-Wilde, M. L., Duchan, J. F., & Higginbotham, D. J. (1995). Successful use of facilitated communication with an oral child. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 658-676.

    Google Scholar 

  49. *Kerrin, R. G., Murdock, J. Y., Sharpton, W. R., & Jones, N. (1998). Who's doing the pointing? Investigating facilitated communication in a classroom setting with students with autism Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 13, 73-79.

    Google Scholar 

  50. *Kezuka, E. (1997). The role of touch in facilitated communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 27, 571-593.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Levine, K., Shane, H. C., & Wharton, R. H. (1994). Response to commentaries of risks of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 32, 317-318.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Margolin, K. N. (1994). How shall facilitated communication be judged? In H. C. Shane, (Ed)., Facilitated communication: The clinical and social phenomenon (pp. 227-258). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  53. *Montee, B. B., Miltenberger, R. G., & Wittrock, D. (1995). An experimental analysis of facilitated communication. Journal of Applied behavior Analysis, 28, 189-200.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mostert, M. P. (1994). The more things change: New ideas, old directions? Beyond Behavior 5, 17-18.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mullen, B. (1989). Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  56. *Myles, B., & Simpson, R. L. (1994). Facilitated communication with children diagnosed as autistic in public school settings. Psychology in the Schools, 31, 208-220.

    Google Scholar 

  57. *Myles, B., Simpson, R. L., & Smith, S. M. (1996a). Collateral behavior and social effects of using facilitated communications with individuals with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11, 163-169, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  58. *Myles, B. S, Simpson, R. L., & Smith, S. M. (1996b). Impact of facilitated communication combined with direct instruction on academic performance of individuals with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11, 37-44.

    Google Scholar 

  59. †Olney, M. (1995). Reading between the lines: A case study on facilitated communication. Journal of the Association for People with Severe Handicaps, 20, 57-65.

    Google Scholar 

  60. *Oswald, D. P. (1994). Facilitator influence in facilitated communication. Journal of Behavioral Education, 4, 191-199.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Perry, A., Bryson, S., & Bebko, J. (1998). Brief report: Degree of facilitator influence in facilitated communication as a function of facilitator characteristics, attitudes, and beliefs. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 87-90.

    Google Scholar 

  62. *Regal, R. A., Rooney, J. R., & Wandas, T. (1994). Facilitated communication: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 345-355.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Shane, H. C. (Ed.). (1994). Facilitated communication: The clinical and social phenomenon. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  64. *Shane, H. C., & Kearns, K. (1994). An examination of the role of the facilitator in “Facilitated Communication.” American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 3, 48-54.

    Google Scholar 

  65. †Sheehan, C. M., & Matuozzi, R. T. (1996). Investigation of the validity of facilitated communication through disclosure of unknown information. Mental Retardation, 34, 94-107.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Silliman, E. R. (1992). Three perspectives of facilitated communication: Unexpected literacy, Clever Hans, or enigma? Topics in Language Disorders, 12, 60-68.

    Google Scholar 

  67. *Simon, E. W., Whitehair, P. M., & Toll, D. M. (1996). A case study: Follow-up assessment of facilitated communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 9-18.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Simpson, R. L., & Myles, B. S. (1995a). Facilitated communication and children with disabilities: An enigma in search of a perspective. Focus on Exceptional Children, 27, 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  69. *Simpson, R. L., & Myles, B. S. (1995b). Effectiveness of facilitated communication with children and youth with autism. Journal of Special Education, 28, 424-439.

    Google Scholar 

  70. *Smith, M. D., Haas, P. J., & Belcher, R. G. (1994). Facilitated communication: The effects of facilitator knowledge and level of assistance on output. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 357-367.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Spitz, H. H. (1997). Nonconscious movements: From mystical messages to facilitated communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  72. *Vazquez, C. A. (1995). Failure to confirm the word-retrieval problem hypothesis in facilitated communication. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 597-610.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Waterhouse, L., Morris, R., Allen, D., Dunn, M., Fein, D., Feinstein, C., Rapin, I., & Wing, L. (1996). Diagnosis and classification in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 26, 59-86.

    Google Scholar 

  74. *Weiss, M. J., Wagner, S. H., & Bauman, M. L. (1996). A validated case study of facilitated communication. Mental Retardation, 34, 220-230.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Williams, D. (1994).In the real world. Journal of the Association for People with Severe Handicaps, 19, 196-199.

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wolfensberger, W. (1992, August/October). The facilitated communication craze: The cold fusion of human sciences. Training Institute for Human Service Planning, Leadership, and Change Agentry, 12, 39-46.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Wolfensberger, W. (1994). The “Facilitation Communication” craze as an instance of pathological science: The cold fusion of human services. In H. C. Shane, (Ed.)., Facilitated communication: The clinical and social phenomenon (pp. 57-122). San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Zirkel, P. A. (1995). Facilitated communication of child abuse? Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 815-817.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mostert, M.P. Facilitated Communication Since 1995: A Review of Published Studies. J Autism Dev Disord 31, 287–313 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010795219886

Download citation

  • facilitated communication
  • autism
  • literature review