Abstract
Stakeholder theory provides a framework for investigating the relationship between corporate social performance (CSP) and corporate financial performance. This relationship is investigated by examining how change in CSP is related to change in financial accounting measures. The findings provide some support for a tenet in stakeholder theory which asserts that the dominant stakeholder group, shareholders, financially benefit when management meets the demands of multiple stakeholders. Specifically, change in CSP was positively associated with growth in sales for the current and subsequent year. This indicates that there are short-term benefits from improving CSP. Return on sales was significantly positively related to change in CSP for the third financial period, indicating that long-term financial benefits may exist when CSP is improved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aupperle, K., A. Carroll and J. Hatfield: 1985, ‘An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 28, 446–463.
Barney, J.: 1986, ‘Organizational Culture; Can It Be a Source of Sustained cCompetitive Advantage?’, Academy of Management Review 11, 656–665.
Barney, J.: 1991, ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management 17, 99–120.
Bernstein, L. A. and J. J. Wild: 1998, Financial Statement Analysis: Theory, Application, and Interpretation ( Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston).
Bowen, R. M., L. DuCharme and D. Shores: 1995, ‘Stakeholders' Implicit Claims and Accounting Method Choice’, Journal of Accounting and Economics 20, 255–295.
Bull, C.: 1987, ‘The Existence of Self-enforcing Implicit Contracts’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 147–156.
Clarkson, M.: 1995a, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review. 20(1), 92–117.
Cochran, P. L. and R. A. Wood: 1984, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance’, Academy of Management 27, 42–56.
Coff, R. W.: 1997, ‘Human Assets and Managerial Dilemmas: Coping with Hazards on the Road to Resource-based Theory’, Academy of Management Review 22, 374–402.
Cohen, W. and D. L. Levinthal: 1990, 'Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152.
Cornell, B. and A. Shapiro: 1987, ‘Corporate Stakeholders and Corporate Finance’, Financial Management 16(1), 5–14.
Dierickx, I. and K. Cool: 1989, ‘Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Firm Performance’, Management Science 35, 1504–1514.
Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91.
Fragos, S. and J. Bennett: 1994, ‘Turnaround at Kodak Park’, Business Quarterly 58(3), 30–38.
Freeman, R. E.: 1983, ‘Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach’, Advances in Strategic Management, 31–60.
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach ( Pitman, Boston).
Friedman, M.: 1962, Capitalism and Freedom ( University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
Frooman, J. S.: 1994, ‘Does the Market Penalize Firms for Socially Irresponsible Behavior?’, IABS Proceedings, 112–119.
Gould, C.: 1994, ‘Social Responsibility Shake-up’, Wall Street Journal, p. F14.
Graves, S. B. and S. A. Waddock: 1994, ‘Institutional Owners and Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 37(4), 63–71.
Griffin, J. and J. Mahon: 1997, ‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-five Years of Incomparable Research’, Business and Society 36, 5–31.
Harte, G., L. Lewis and D. Owen: 1991, ‘Ethical Investment and the Corporate Reporting Function’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2, 227–253.
Hart, S. L.: 1995, ‘A Natural-resource-based View of the Firm’, Academy of Management Review 20, 986–1014.
Hawkins, D. F.: 1998, Corporate Financial Reporting and Analysis: Text and Cases ( Irwin/McGraw-Hill, Boston).
Indianapolis Star, Staff: 1998, ‘Thalidomide Victims Cautious But Supportive of FDA Approval’, Indianapolis Star (20 July), B12.
Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review (April), 404–437.
Kogut, B. and U. Zander: 1992, ‘Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology’, Organization Science 3, 383–397.
Kurtz, L., S. Lydenberg and P. D. Kinder: 1992, ‘The Domini Social Index: A New Benchmark for Social Investors’, in P. Kinder, S. Lydenberg and A. Domini (eds.), Social Investment Almanac ( Henry Holt & Company, New York, NY).
Mahoney, J. T. and J. R. Pandian: 1992, ‘The Resource-based View Within the Conversation of Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal 13, 363–380.
McGuire, J. B., A. Sundgren and T. Schneeweis: 1988, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Financial Performance’, Academy of Management Journal 31(4), 854–872.
Mitchell, R. N., B. R. Agle and D. J. Wood: 1995, Stakeholder Attributes and Firm Responsibilities and Responses. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver, Canada.
Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M. H. Kutner: 1985, Applied Linear Statistical Models ( Richard D. Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL).
Palepu, K. G., V. Bernard and P. M. Healy: 1996, Business Analysis and Valuation Using Financial Statement, Chapter 4 ( Southwestern College Publishing, Cincinnati, Ohio).
Quinn, D. P. and T. M. Jones: 1995, ‘An Agent Morality View of Business Policy’, Academy of Management Review 20, 22–42.
Rasmusen, E.: 1992, Games and Information ( Blackwell, Cambridge, MA).
Rockness, J. and P. F. Williams: 1988, ‘A Descriptive Study of Social Responsibility Mutual Funds’, Accounting, Organization and Society 13(4), 397–411.
Ruf, B. M., K. Muralidhar and K. Paul: 1998, ‘The Development of a Systematic, Aggregate Measure of Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Management 24(1), 119–133.
Russo, M. V. and P. A. Fouts: 1997, ‘A Resourcebased Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability’, Academy of Management Journal 40, 534–559.
Saaty, T. L.: 1980, The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation ( McGraw Hill, New York, NY).
Shapiro, J.: 1992, ‘The Movement in Social Investment Since 197 0’, in P. Kinder, S. Lydenberg and A. Domini (eds.), Social Investment Almanac ( Henry Holt and Company, New York, NY).
Tesler, L.: 1980, ‘Theory of Self-enforcing Agreements’, Journal of Business, 27–44.
Ullmann, A.: 1985, ‘Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationship Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms’, Academy of Management Review 10, 540–577.
Wernerfelt, B.: 1984, ‘A Resource Based View of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal 5, 171–180.
Williamson, O. E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies ( Free Press, New York).
Williamson, O. E.: 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism ( MacMillian, New York).
Wood, D.: 1991a, ‘Corporate Social Performance Revisited’, Academy of Management Review 16, 691–718.
Wood, D.: 1991b, ‘Social Issues in Management: Theory and Research in Corporate Social Performance’, Journal of Management 17: 383–406.
Wood, D. J. and E. J. Jones: 1995, ‘Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance’, The International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3), 229–267.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ruf, B.M., Muralidhar, K., Brown, R.M. et al. An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship Between Change in Corporate Social Performance and Financial Performance: A Stakeholder Theory Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 32, 143–156 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010786912118
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010786912118