Skip to main content
Log in

Statistical Analysis of Spatial Pattern: A Comparison of Grid and Hierarchical Sampling Approaches

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous studies have combined random-site hierarchical sampling designs with analysis of variance techniques, and grid sampling with spatial autocorrelation analysis. We illustrate that analysis techniques and sampling designs are interchangeable using densities of an infaunal bivalve from a study in Poverty Bay, New Zealand. Hierarchical designs allow the estimation of variances associated with each level, but high-level factors are imprecisely estimated, and they are inefficient for describing spatial pattern. Grid designs are efficient for describing spatial pattern, and are amenable to conventional analysis. Our example deals with a continuous spatial habitat, but our conclusions also apply in disjunct or patchy habitats. The influence of errors in positioning is also assessed. The advantages of systematic sampling are reviewed, and more efficient hierarchical approaches are identified. The distinction between biological and statisticalsignificance in all analyses is emphasised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew, N. L. and Mapstone, B. D.: 1987, ‘Sampling and the description of spatial pattern in marine ecology’, Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 25, 39–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, T. R.: 1965, ‘Staggered nested designs for estimating variance components’, Industrial Quality Control 22, 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G.: 1946, ‘Relative accuracy of systematic and stratified random samples for a certain class of populations’, Ann. Math. Stat. 17, 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W. G.: 1963, Sampling Techniques, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, R. and Harrison, A. R.: 1993, ‘Two-dimensional systematic sampling of land use’, Appl. Stat. 42, 585–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. I. and Schneider, D. C.: 1997, ‘Evaluation of a gradient sampling design for environmental impact assessment’, Environ. Monit. Assess. 48, 157–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francis, R. I. C. C.: 1984, ‘An adaptive strategy for stratified random trawl surveys’, N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 18, 59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. H.: 1979, Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists, 1st ed., Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. E., Legendre, P., McArdle, B. H., Thrush, S. F., Bellhumeur, C. and Lawrie, S. M.: 1997, ‘Identifying relationships between adult and juvenile bivalves at different spatial scales’, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 216, 77–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R. J., Lincoln Smith, M. P. and Fairweather, P. G.: 1995, ‘Sieve mesh-size and taxonomic resolution needed to describe natural spatial variation of marine macrofauna’, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 118, 187–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall, M. A. and Widdicombe, S.: 1999, ‘Small scale patterns in the structure of macrofaunal assemblages of shallow soft sediments’, J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 237, 127–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattree, R., Naik, D. N. and Mason, R. L.: 1997, ‘Estimation of variance components in staggered nested designs’, J. Appl. Stat. 24, 395–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khuri, A. I. and Sahai, H.: 1985, ‘Variance components analysis: a selective literature survey’, Int. Stat. Rev. 53, 279–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koele, P.: 1982, ‘Calculating power in analysis of variance’, Psych. Bull. 92, 513–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L. and Demers, S.: 1984, ‘Towards dynamic biological oceanography and limnology’, Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 41, 2–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P.: 1993, ‘Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm?’ Ecol. 74, 1659–1673.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, P. and Fortin, M.-J.: 1989, ‘Spatial pattern and ecological analysis’, Vegetatio 80, 107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madow, W. G.: 1949, ‘On the theory of systematic sampling II’, Ann. Math. Stat. 20, 333–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madow, W. G.: 1953, ‘On the theory of systematic sampling III’, Ann. Math. Stat. 24, 101–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madow, W. G. and Madow, L. H.: 1944, ‘On the theory of systematic sampling’, Ann. Math. Stat. 15, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantel, N.: 1967, ‘The detection of disease clustering and a generalised regression approach’, Cancer Research 27, 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapstone, B. D.: 1995, ‘Scalable decision rules for environmental impact studies: effect size, Type I and Type II errors’, Ecol. Appl. 5, 401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, B. H. and Blackwell, R. G.: 1989, ‘Measurement of density variability in the bivalve Chione stutchburyi’, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 52, 245–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, B. H. and Pawley, M. D. M.: 1994, ‘Cost-Benefit Analysis in the Design of Biological Monitoring Programmes: Is It Worth the Effort?’ in D. J. Fletcher and B. F. J. Manly (eds.), Statistics in Ecology and Environmental Monitoring, University of Otago Press, Dunedin, pp. 239–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrett, N. G.: 1997, ‘An ecological survey on the effect of the dump ground on benthos in Poverty Bay’, MSc thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 129 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, A.: 1959, ‘The centric systematic area sample treated as a random sample’, Biometrics 15, 270–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey, D. J., Howitt, L., Underwood, A. J. and Stark, J. S.: 1992, ‘Spatial variation in soft sediment benthos’, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 81, 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osenberg, C. W., Sarnelle, O., Cooper, S. D. and Holt, R. D.: 1999, ‘Resolving ecological questions through meta-analysis: goals, metrics, and models’, Ecology 80, 1105–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, A. N. and McBratney, A. B.: 1993, ‘Sampling designs for estimating spatial variance components’, Appl. Statist. 42, 185–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, B. D.: 1981, Spatial statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, D. S., Smith, D. G. and Read, G. B.: 1989, ‘Benthos associated with two New Zealand coastal outfalls’, N. Z. J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 23, 295–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, R. E., Mulla, D. J., Journel, A. G. and Franz, E. H.: 1992, ‘Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting spatial dependence’, Ecol. Monogr. 62, 277–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute Inc.: 1989, SAS/STAT Users Guide, Version 6, 4th ed., Vol. 2, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader-Frechette, K. S. and McCoy, E. D.: 1992. ‘Statistics, costs and rationality in ecological inference’, TREE 7, 96–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smouse, P. E., Long, J. C. and Sokal, R. R.: 1986, ‘Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence’, Syst. Zool. 35, 627–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and Oden, N. L.: 1978a, ‘Spatial autocorrelation in biology, 1. Methodology’, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10, 199–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and Oden, N. L.: 1978b, ‘Spatial autocorrelation in biology, 2. Some biological applications of evolutionary and ecological interest’, Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10, 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thrush, S. F.: 1991, ‘Spatial patterns in soft-bottom communities’, TREE 6, 75–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, G. J. G. and Fingleton, B.: 1985, Spatial data analysis by example. Volume I. Point pattern and quantitative analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, G. J. G. and Fingleton, B.: 1989, Spatial data analysis by example. Volume II. Categorical and directional data, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, K. M.: 1984, ‘An investigation of some estimators of variance for systematic sampling’, J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 79, 781–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, M. L.: 1994, ‘The effects of Dredge Spoil disposal on the benthic fauna of Poverty Bay – a baseline survey’, MSc thesis, University of Waikato.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. G. Cole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cole, R.G., Healy, T.R., Wood, M.L. et al. Statistical Analysis of Spatial Pattern: A Comparison of Grid and Hierarchical Sampling Approaches. Environ Monit Assess 69, 85–99 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010756729485

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010756729485

Navigation