Sexuality and Disability

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 71–83 | Cite as

Design and Evaluation of an Internet Site to Educate Women with Disabilities on Reproductive Health Care

  • Stephanie Pendergrass
  • Margaret A. Nosek
  • J. David Holcomb

Abstract

Women with disabilities often do not receive adequate reproductive health care. In order to improve their health, they need to be better informed. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine if the Internet can effectively be used to educate women with disabilities about reproductive health. A time-series design was utilized in which the knowledge of each participant was tested before and after she toured an Internet site on reproductive health. The women were also surveyed for demographic data and for their comments on the site. To be included in the study, a woman had to be over the age of eighteen and have a mobility impairment. Twenty-six women from the United States and Canada participated in the study. Like other Internet users, they were predominately white, highly educated, and relatively affluent. They used the Internet primarily for communication (e-mail). One of the most significant findings in this study was that, although the women surveyed were highly educated, they had fundamental deficits in their knowledge of reproductive health. Thus, although these women did not match other women with disabilities demographically, they shared a need for education on reproductive health. A second significant finding was that the web site was effective in increasing the participants' knowledge of reproductive health. This was indicated by the statistically significant 10.00% increase in post-test scores over pre-test scores and by the women's positive feedback. Thus, the Internet site developed for this pilot study did prove to be a valuable education tool. As the Internet continues to expand and users continue to diversify, health education sites of this type should become even more effective in helping women with disabilities to break down traditional barriers and lead healthier lives.

reproductive health women Internet 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Langdon KK: Level of Understanding of Sexuality, Reproductive Health Care Utilization Practices, and Attitudes Towards Current Health Care Services Among Women with Physical Disabilities. Baylor College of Medicine: Master of Science Thesis, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Krotoski DM, Nosek MA, Turk MA: Women with Physical Disabilities: Achieving and Maintaining Health and Well-Being. Baltimore: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co., 1996.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blum RW: Sexual Health Contraceptive Needs of Adolescents With Chronic Conditions. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine. 1997;151:290-7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Center for Research on Women with Disabilities: Findings from the National Study of Women with Physical Disabilities. Lecture to physician assistant students, Baylor College of Medicine, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pealer LN, Dorman SM: Evaluating Health-Related Web Sites. Journal of School Health. 1997;67(6):232-5.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research: Access to Disability Data-An InfoUse Project. 1997: http://www.infouse.com/disabilitydat/addhome.text.html.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nosek, MA, Young ME, Rintala DH, et al: Barriers to Reproductive Health Maintenance Among Women with Physical Disabilities. Journal of Women's Health. 1995;4(5):505-18.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nosek MA: Point of View: Primary Care Issues for Women with Severe Physical Disabilities. Journal of Women's Health. 1992;1(4):245-8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Beckmann CRB, Gittler M, Barzancky BM, et al: Gynecologic Health Care of Women with Disabilities. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1989;74(1):75.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malloy GL, Herold SS: Factors Related to Sexual Counseling of Physically Disabled Adults. Journal of Sex Research. 1988;24:227-34.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cromer B, Enrile B, McCoy K, Gerhardstein M, et al: Knowledge, Attitudes and Beliefs Related to Sexuality in Adolescents With Chronic Disability. Dev Med Child Neurology. 1990;32:602-10.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    RWJ Foundation: Survey finds U.S. health care system not meeting needs of people with disabilities. Advances. 1994:B11.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Graphics, Visualization, & Usability Center, College of Computing, Georgia Insitute of Technology: GVU's Ninth WWW User Survey. April 1998: http://www.gvu.gatech.edu/user-surveys.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wirthlin Worldwide: The Wirthlin Report Online. March 1998: http://www.decima.com/publicns/ report/wr9803.html.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Frisby AJ: The Internet and Medical Education. Delaware Medical Journal. 1996;68(12):602-5.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cooling N, Kidd M, Sloggett S: Use of Computers by General Practitioners for Patient Education. Australian Family Physician. 1997;26(1):31-6.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stivers C et al: Internet: The Contemporary Health Educator's Most Versatile Tool. Journal of Health Education. 1995;26(4):196-9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maddux CD: The Internet: Educational Prospects-and Problems. Educational Technology. 1994;34(7):37-42.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mediamark Research Inc.: 44 Million American Adults Regularly Use Internet. May 1998: http://www.mediamark.com/pages/prcyber1.html.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Pendergrass
    • 1
  • Margaret A. Nosek
    • 1
  • J. David Holcomb
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Research on Women with DisabilitiesHouston

Personalised recommendations