Advertisement

Journal of Business Ethics

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 219–230 | Cite as

THE* Rules of Stakeholder Satisfaction (* Timeliness, Honesty, Empathy)

  • Kelly C. Strong
  • Richard C. Ringer
  • Steven A. Taylor
Article

Abstract

The results of an exploratory study examining the role of trust in stakeholder satisfaction are reported. Customers, stockholders, and employees of financial institutions were surveyed to identify management behaviors that lead to stakeholder satisfaction. The factors critical to satisfaction across stakeholder groups are the timeliness of communication, the honesty and completeness of the information and the empathy and equity of treatment by management.

justice satisfaction stakeholder management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brockner, J. and P. Siegel: 1996, ‘Understanding the Interaction Between Procedural and Distributive Justice: The Role of Trust’, in R. M. Kramer andT. R. Tyler (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA), pp. 390–413.Google Scholar
  2. De Castro, J. O., G. D. Meyer,K. C. Strong andN. Uhlenbruck: 1996, ‘Government Objectives and Organizational Characteristics: A Stakeholder View of Privatization Effectiveness’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis 4(4), 373–392.Google Scholar
  3. Donaldson, T.: 1999, ‘Response: Making Stakeholder Theory Whole’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 237–241.Google Scholar
  4. Freeman, R. E.: 1999, ‘Response: Divergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 233–236.Google Scholar
  5. Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Pittman, Boston).Google Scholar
  6. Gardial, S., D. S. Clemons,R. B. Woodruff,D. W. Schuman andM. J. Burns: 1994, ‘Comparing Consumers Recall of Prepurchase and Postpurchase Product Evaluation Experiences’, Journal of Consumer Research 24 (March), 548–560.Google Scholar
  7. Gioia, D. A.: 1999, ‘Response: Practicability, Paradigms, and Problems in Stakeholder Theorizing’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 228–232.Google Scholar
  8. Greenberg, J.: 1990, ‘Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow’, Journal of Management 16, 399–432.Google Scholar
  9. Huse, M. and D. Eide: 1996, ‘Stakeholder Management and the Avoidance of Corporate Control’, Business and Society 35(2), 211–243.Google Scholar
  10. Husted, B. W.: 1998, ‘Organizational Justice and the Management of Stakeholder Relations’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 643–651.Google Scholar
  11. Jones, T. M., and A. C. Wicks: 1999, ‘Convergent Stakeholder Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 206–221.Google Scholar
  12. Laban, R. and H. C. Wolf: 1993, ‘Large Scale Privatization in Transition Economies’, American Economic Review 83, 1199–1210.Google Scholar
  13. Leventhal, G. S., J. Karuza andW. R. Fry: 1980, ‘Beyond Fairness: A Theory of Allocation Preferences’, in G. Mikula (ed.), Justice and Social Interaction (Springer-Verlag, New York), pp. 167–218.Google Scholar
  14. McDonald, K. R.: 1993, ‘Why Privatization Is Not Enough’, Harvard Business Review 71(3), 49–59.Google Scholar
  15. Oliver, R. L.: 1993, ‘Cognitive, Affective, and Attribute Bases of the Satisfaction Response’, Journal of Consumer Research 20 (December), 418–430.Google Scholar
  16. Parasuraman, A.,V. A. Zeithaml andL. L. Berry: 1985, ‘A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research’, Journal of Marketing 49 (Fall), 41–50.Google Scholar
  17. Ring, P. S.: 1996, ‘Fragile and Resilient Trust and Their Roles in Economic Exchange’, Business and Society 35(2), 148–175.Google Scholar
  18. Spreng, R. A., S. B. MacKenzie andR. W. Olshavsky: 1996, ‘A Reexamination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction’, Journal of Marketing 60(3), 15–32.Google Scholar
  19. Taylor, S. A.: 1993, ‘The Roles of Service Quality, Consumer Satisfaction, and Value in Quinn's (1992) Paradigm of Services’, The Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 2(1) (Fall), 14–26.Google Scholar
  20. Trevino, L. K. andG. R. Weaver: 1999, ‘Response: The Stakeholder Research Tradition” Converging Theorists-Not Convergent Theory’, Academy of Management Review 24(2), 222–227.Google Scholar
  21. Waddock, S. A. andS. B. Graves: 1997, ‘Quality of Management and Quality of Stakeholder Relations: Are They Synonymous?’, Business and Society 36(3), 250–279.Google Scholar
  22. Welbourne, T. M. 1998: “Untangling Procedural and Distributive Justice”, Group & Organization Management 23, 325–346.Google Scholar
  23. Westbrook, R. A.,J. W. Newman andJ. R. Taylor: 1978, ‘Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction in the Purchase Decision Process’, Journal of Marketing 42 (October), 54–60.Google Scholar
  24. Wood, D. J. and R. E. Jones: 1995, ‘Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance’, International Journal of Organizational Analysis 3(3), 229–267.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelly C. Strong
    • 1
  • Richard C. Ringer
    • 2
  • Steven A. Taylor
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Business and EconomicsMichigan Technological UniversityHoughtonU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of Management and Quantitative MethodsIllinois State UniversityNormalU.S.A.
  3. 3.Department of MarketingIllinois State UniversityNormalU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations