Skip to main content
Log in

Self-Reported Consequences of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Study of Contrasting TBI and Non-TBI Participants

  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the affective and behavioral concerns of male and female adults in the areas of cognition, ego adaptability, and sexuality. Participants were given two Likert-type questionnaires: affective and behavioral. Three two-way analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) compared the independent variables of gender and injury status to the dependent variables of cognition, ego adaptability, and sexuality. Results suggest that non-Traumatic Brain Injured (TBI) participants have more positive feelings about their cognition, ego adaptability, and sexuality than TBI participants. It was found that although female participants without TBI have more positive feelings about their sexuality than male participants without TBI, the opposite is true for TBI participants. Male participants with TBI had the most concerns about their sexuality of all four groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Sosin DM, Sniezek JE, & Thurman DJ: Incidence of mild and moderate brain injury in the United States. Brain Injury 10: 47–54, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sosin DM & Sniezek JE: Trends in death associated with traumatic brain injury, 1979 through 1992. Journal of the American Medical Association 273: 1778–1780, 1995.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Savage RC & Wolcott GF: Educational dimensions of acquired brain injury. Austin, TX: PROED. 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bigler ED: Brain imaging and behavioral outcome in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Learning Disabilities 29(5): 515–530, 1996.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Scala C, Osberg JS, Gans BM, Chin LJ, & Grant CC: Children with traumatic head injury: Morbidity and postacute treatment. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 72: 662–666, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker R: Traumatic brain injury and neuropsychological impairment: Sensorimotor, cognitive, emotional and adaptive problems of children and adults. New York: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc. 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kreutzer S & Zasler ND: Psychosexual consequences of traumatic brain injury: Methodology and preliminary findings. Brain Injury 3: 177–186, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lezak, MD: Neuropathology for neuropsychologists. In Lezak, M. (ed.), Neuropsychological Assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 164–203, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lezak, MD: Brain Damage is a Family Affair. Journal of Clinical & Experimental Neuropsychology 10(1): 111–123, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Usayal S, Hibbard MR, Robillard D, Pappadopulos E, & Jaffe M: The Effect of Parental Traumatic Brain Injury on Parenting and Child Behavior. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 13(6): 57–71, 1998.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooks N, Campsie L, Symington C, Beattie A, & McKinlay W: The effects of severe head injury on patient and relative within seven years of injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 2(3): 1–13, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Levin HS, Ewing-Cobbs L, & Fletcher JM: Neurobehavioral outcome of mild head injury in children. In Mild Head Injury, HS Levin, HM Eisenberg, and AL Benton (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 189–211.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lezak MD: Brain damage is a family affair. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10(1): 111–123, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Marsh N, Knight R, & Godfrey H: Long-term psychosocial adjustment following very severe closed head injury. Neuropsychology, 4, 13–27, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wrightson P: Management of disability and rehabilitation services after mild head injury. In Mild Head Injury, HS Levin, HM Eisenberg and AL Benton (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gaudet L: The development of a self-report symptom inventory of psychosocial concerns of traumatic brain injured (TBI) individuals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Northern Colorado, 1995.

  17. Lezak MD: Neuropathology for neuropsychologists. In Lezak, M. (ed.), Neuropsychological Assessment (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 164–203, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lezak MD: Psychological implications of traumatic brain damage for the patient's family. Rehabilitation Psychology, 31(4): 241–250, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lezak MD: Brain damage is a family affair. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10(1): 111–123, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reitan RM & Wolfson D: The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levin HS, Eisenberg H, & Benton A: Mild Head Injury. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gaudet, L., Crethar, H.C., Burger, S. et al. Self-Reported Consequences of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Study of Contrasting TBI and Non-TBI Participants. Sexuality and Disability 19, 111–119 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010673722429

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010673722429

Navigation