Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An Examination of Auditor Independence Issues from the Perspectives of U.K. Finance Directors

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis of the opinions of U.K. Finance Directors – also known as Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) in North America – on factors which may effect the roles and responsibilities of the external auditor to the organization. A number of proposals have been put forward over the years to enhance auditor independence and these were treated as dependent variables in this study. A questionnaire was mailed to 3 000 named Finance Directors and 776 useable replies were received. From the responses to the questionnaire, three independent variables were identified: opinions on the value of the audit in general; opinions on the impact of the audit on the organization; and the relationship between the Finance Director and the auditor. The results reveal that those Finance Directors concerned in general about the value of auditing favoured the banning of non-audit work and the rotation of auditors. In addition, those Finance Directors with good relationships with their external auditors preferred the banning of non-audit services and the rotation of external auditors. Those respondents favouring the separate regulation of auditors were also concerned about the impact of the audit on the organization. The results of this study shed some light on the sensitivity of U.K. Finance Directors to ethical issues regarding external auditor independence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Auditing Practices Board: 1992, The Future Development of Auditing (London).

  • Bagnall, S.: 1992, ‘Competitive Fees Reveal Price War’, Accountancy Age (April).

  • Barkess, L. and R. Simnett: 1994, ‘The Provision of Other Services by Auditors: Independence and Pricing Issues’, Accounting and Business Research 24(94), 99–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, V. and S. Fearnley: 1994, ‘The Changing Structure of the Market for Audit Services in the U.K.-a Descriptive Study’, British Accounting Review 26(4), 301–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briloff, A.: 1994, ‘Our Profession's “Jurassic Park”’, The CPA Journal 64, 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Board for Chartered Accountants in Business: 1990, The Status of the Audit/Client Relationship, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

  • Cadbury Committee: 1992, The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance (Gee).

  • Carmichael, D. R.: 1999, ‘In Search of Concepts of Auditor Independence’, The CPA Journal (May), 69(5), 38–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chartered Accountants Joint Ethics Committee: 1995. The Framework: A New Approach to Professional Independence, Consultative Paper, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.

  • Craswell, A.: 1988, ‘The Association between Qualified Opinions and Auditor Switching’, Accounting and Business Research (Autumn), 23–31.

  • Craswell, A.: 1992, ‘Auditing Pricing in Australia 1980–198 9’, Australian Accounting Review, 28–33.

  • Darnill, A.: 1992, ‘The Auditor's Dilemma’, Accountancy ( June), 110–111.

  • Diekmeyer, P.: 2000, ‘The Heat Is On’, The CA Magazine (October), 20–26.

  • Fearnley, S. and M. Page: 1994, Auditing Regulations in the U.K.: Lemons, Cadillacs and Free Riders, EAA Conference Paper, Venice, April.

  • Financial Reporting Council: 1992, The State of Financial Reporting-A Review (London).

  • Glenn, W.: 1993, ‘Lloyd's Auditors under Pressure to Reduce Fees’, Accountancy Age (March), 11.

  • Goldman, A. and B. Barlev: 1974, ‘The Auditor Firm Conflict of Interests: Its Implications for Independence’, The Accounting Review, 701–718.

  • Goldwasser, D. L.: 1999, ‘Independence in a Changing Accounting Profession’, The CPA Journal 69 (October), 46–48.

  • Gul, F. A.: 1991, ‘Size of Audit Fees and Perceptions of Auditors' Ability to Resist Management Pressure in Audit Conflict Situations’, ABACUS, 162–170.

  • Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland: 1995, Audit Regulation in the Public Interest-A Framework for Public Accounting Practices (Edinburgh), June.

  • Karcher, J. N.: 1996, ‘Auditors' Ability to Discern the Presence of Ethical Problems’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 1033–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, H. C. and P. Mahathevan: 1993, ‘The Effects of Client Employment on Auditor Independence’, British Accounting Review 25, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, M. J.: 1991, ‘The Belief in a Just World and the “Heroic Motive”: Searching for “Constants” in the Psychology of Religious Ideology’, The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion 1(1), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, D. J. and K. Pany: 1994, ‘Auditor Independence: The Performance of Consulting Engagements with Audit Clients’, Journal of Applied Accounting Research 10(1), 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McInnes, W. M.: 1993, Auditing into the 21st Century, Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.

  • Moizer, P.: 1997, ‘Auditor Reputation: The International Empirical Evidence’, International Journal of Auditing 1(1), 61–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmrose, Z. V.: 1986, ‘Audit Fees and Auditor Size: Further Evidence’, Journal of Accounting Research 24(1), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzberg, J. W. and G. R. Sevcik: 1994, ‘A Multiperiod Model and Experimental Evidence of Independence and “Lowballing”’, Contemporary Accounting Research 11(1), 137–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetze, W. P.: 1994, ‘A Mountain or a Molehill?’, Accounting Horizons 8, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simunic, D. A.: 1984, ‘Auditing, Consulting, and Auditor Independence’, Journal of Accounting Research 22(2), 161–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp, E.: 1965, ‘Informing the Shareholders: Published Accounts and Reports’, Accountants Journal (November), 130–135.

  • Sweeney, J. T. and R. W. Roberts: 1997, ‘Cognitive Moral Development and Auditor Independence’, Accounting Organisations and Society 22(3), 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. and S. Turley: 1986, The Regulation of Accounting (Basil Blackwell).

  • Tricker, R. I.: 1978. The Independent Director (Tolley).

  • Whittington, G., P. Grout and I. Jewitt: 1995, ‘Is Total Auditor Independence a Good Thing?’, Accountancy (February) 115, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windsor, C. A. and N. M. Ashkanasy: 1995, ‘The Effect of Client Management Bargaining Power, moral Reasoning Development, and Belief in a Just World on Auditor Independence’, Accounting Organisations and Society 20(7/8), 710–720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wines, G.: 1994, ‘Auditor Independence, Audit Qualifications and the Provision of Non-Audit Services: A Note’, Accounting and Finance 34(1), 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Odette School of Business, University of Windsor, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, N9B 3P4, E-mail

    Roger Hussey & George Lan

Authors
  1. Roger Hussey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George Lan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hussey, R., Lan, G. An Examination of Auditor Independence Issues from the Perspectives of U.K. Finance Directors. Journal of Business Ethics 32, 169–178 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010636122383

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010636122383

Search

Navigation