This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
REFERENCES
Austin, J.: 1975, How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed., Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Bach, K.: 1994a, ‘Semantic Slack: What is Said and More’ in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech Act Theory, Routledge, London, pp. 267-291.
Bach, K.: 1994b, ‘Conversational Impliciture’ Mind and Language 9, 124-162.
Bach, K.: 1997, ‘The Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction: What It Is and Why It Matters’ Linguistiche Berichte 8, 33-50.
Berg, J.: 1998, ‘In Defense of Direct Belief: Substitutivity, Availability and Iterability’ Lingua e Stile 33, 461-470.
Grice, P.: 1957, ‘Meaning’ Philosophical Review 66, 377-388.
Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Way of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Kaplan, D.: 1989, ‘Demonstratives’ in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 481-563.
Recanati, F.: 1988, Meaning and Force, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Recanati, F.: 1993, Direct Reference: From Language to Thought, Blackwell, Oxford.
Recanati, F.: 1995, ‘The Alleged Priority of Literal Interpretation’ Cognitive Science 19, 207-232.
Salmon, N.: 1991, ‘The Pragmatic Fallacy’ Philosophical Studies 63, 83-97.
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson: 1986, Relevance: Communication and Cognition, Blackwell, Oxford.
Waismann, F.: 1951, ‘Verifiability’ in A. Flew (ed.), Logic and Language, 1st series, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 17-44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Recanati, F. What Is Said. Synthese 128, 75–91 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010383405105
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010383405105