Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Amateurs and Professionals in One County: Biology and Natural History in Late Victorian Yorkshire

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

My goals in this paper are twofold: to outline there fashioning of amateur and professional roles in life science in late Victorian Yorkshire, and to provide a revised historiography of the relationship between amateurs and professionals in this era. Some historical treatments of this relationship assume that amateurs were demoralized by the advances of laboratory science, and so ceased to contribute and were left behind by the autonomous “new biology.” Despite this view, I show that many amateurs played a vital part in the construction of a professional academic community in urban Yorkshire, and then continued to collaborate with the laboratory-based biologists. The key to any analysis of the relationship between amateurs and professionals is the great variety of amateur identities and practices in Victorian Yorkshire. The amateur-professional riftfallacy arose because laboratory biologists fashioned an identity in conscious opposition to a particular type of amateur: an ideal that belied an array of co-operative relationships. As naturalists refashioned their roles and identities in light of the changes within academe and without, debates about the practice and place of life science took place as often among amateurs as between professionals and amateurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, D. E. 1969. The Victorian Fern Craze: A History of Pteridomania. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. E. 1976 [1994]. The Naturalist in Britain: A Social History, 2nd edn. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, D. E. 1988. “The Survival of the Amateur Tradition in the Newly Professional World of Biology.” Program, Papers, and Abstracts for the Joint BSHS-HSS Anglo-American Conference: 77–84.

  • Allen, D. E. 1998. “On Parallel Lines: Natural History and Biology from the Late Victorian Period.” Archives of Natural History 25: 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous. 1873. “List of Scientific Societies and Field Clubs in Great Britain and Ireland.” Nature 8: 521–524.

  • Anonymous. 1874. “West Riding Naturalists’ Society.” Wakefield Free Press (18th April): unpag.

  • Anonymous. 1880. “With the Yorkshire Naturalists [Reprinted from the Huddersfield Weekly News, August 7th 1880].” The Naturalist 6: [facing p. 32], 1–8.

  • Anonymous. Circa 1921. Biography of L.C. Miall. Manuscript: Miall Family Collection.

  • Appleton, C. (ed.). 1876. Essays on the Endowment of Research. London: King.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argles, M. 1964. South Kensington to Robbins: An Account of English Technical and Scientific Education since 1851. London: Longmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, J. W. 1978. “Origins of the Nature Study Movement.” Natural Science in Schools 16: 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. A. and Bayliss, R. A. 1982. “Louis Compton Miall, F.R.S.: Scientist and Educator 1842–1921.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London 37: 201–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. A. and Bayliss, R. A. 1985. “The Amateur and Professional Scientist: A Comment on Louis C. Miall (1842–1921).” The Naturalist 110: 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. A. and Edmonds, J. M. 1998. “Louis Compton Miall (1842–1921) – The Origins and Development of Biology at the University of Leeds.” The Linnean 14: 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, L. 1980. The Heyday of Natural History 1820–1870. London: Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, K. R. 1986. “Concluding Remarks: American Natural History and Biology in the Nineteenth Century.” American Zoologist 26: 381–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, M. 1975. “ ‘Hegemony’ and the Amateur Tradition in British Science.” Journal of Social History 8: 30–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binfield, C. 1977. So Down to Prayers: Studies in English Nonconformity 1780–1920. London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binfield, C. 1993. “Religion in Sheffield.” In:The History of the City of Sheffield 1843–1993 VolumeII: Society, ed. C. Binfield et al., pp. 364–428. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, J. M. 1986. Patronage and Society in Nineteenth-Century England. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P. J. 1992. The Fontana History of the Environmental Sciences. London: Fontana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broks, P. 1990. “Science, the Press and Empire: Pearson's Publications, 1890–1914.” In: Imperialism and the Natural World, ed. J. M. Mackenzie, pp. 141–163. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerini, J. 1996. “Wallace in the Field.” Osiris 11: 44–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Saunders, A. M. and Wilson, P. A. 1933. The Professions. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, W. E. and Roebuck, W. D. 1881. A Handbook of the Vertebrate Fauna of Yorkshire. London: Lovell Reeve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R. and Pumfrey, S. 1994. “Separate Spheres and Public Places: Reflections on the History of Science Popularization and Science in Popular Culture.” History of Science 32: 237–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossland, C. 1903. “The Distribution and Association of the Mosses and Hepatics in the Parish of Halifax.” Halifax Naturalist 8: 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump, W. B. 1911. “TheWilting ofMoorland Plants.” Report of the British Association: 582.

  • ——1931. “In Memoriam. Charles Edward Moss, 1870–1930.” The Naturalist: 55–59.

  • Denny, A. 1929. “Resumé of the Biological Work of Dr. H.C. Sorby, F.R.S.” Proceedings of the Sorby Scientific Society 1: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, A. 1987. “Artisan Resistance and Evolution in Britain, 1819–1848.” Osiris 3: 77–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drouin, J.-M. and Bensaude-Vincent, B. 1996. “Nature for the People.” In: Cultures of Natural History, ed. N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary, pp. 408–425. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, A. J. 1983. From Clergyman to Don: The Rise of the Academic Profession in Nineteenth-Century Oxford. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farber, P. 1982. “The Transformation of Natural History in the Nineteenth Century.” Journal of the History of Biology 15: 145–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, W. H. 1893. “Museums Association.” Nature 48: 234–236, 254–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, M. 1898. “Integration in Science.” The Naturalist: 209–233.

  • Fowler, B. 1997. Pierre Bourdieu and Cultural Theory: Critical Investigations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, W. 1877. Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union: Inaugural Address Delivered by the President. Private Circulation: Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union.

  • Gates, B. T. 1998. Kindred Nature: Victorian and Edwardian Women Embrace the Living World. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates, B. T. and Shteir, A. B. (eds.). 1997. Natural Eloquence: Women Reinscribe Science. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatty, M. 1870. “Microscopic Objects.”Aunt Judy's Magazine: 311–316, 359–362.

  • Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48: 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooday, G. 1991. “ ‘Nature’ in the Laboratory: Domestication and Discipline with the Microscope in Victorian Life Science.” British Journal for the History of Science 24: 307–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grove, W. B. 1892. “The Happy Fungus-Hunter.” Midland Naturalist 15: 158–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevly, B. 1996. “The Heroic Science of Glacier Motion.” Osiris 11: 66–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewetson, H. B. 1880. “The Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union, its Origin, Constitution, and Modes of Working. With Remarks on the Study of Natural History.” The Naturalist 6: 129–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, N. 1963. A Very Scientific Gentleman: The Major Achievements of Henry Clifton Sorby. London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. 1981. “Science, Sentimentalism or Social Control? The Nature Study Movement in England and Wales, 1899–1914.” History of Education 10: 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. and Swinnerton, B. J. 1996. “The School Nature Study Union 1903–1994.” History of Education 25: 181–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kargon, R. H. 1977. Science in Victorian Manchester: Enterprise and Expertise. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, E. B. 1992. The Botanizers: Amateur Scientists in Nineteenth-Century America. Chapel Hill and London: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendal, P., Smith, W. G. and Woodhead, T. W. 1904. “Committee of Suggestions for Research.” The Naturalist: 137–141.

  • Kitson, C. E. 1924. The History of 100 Years of Life of the Leeds Philosophical and Literary Society. Leeds: Jowett & Sowry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koditschek, T. 1990. Class Formation and Urban-Industrial Society: Bradford, 1750–1850. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlstedt, S. G. 1976. “The Nineteenth-Century Amateur Tradition: The Case of the Boston Society of Natural History.” In: Science and Its Public: the Changing Relationship, ed. G. Holton and W. A. Blanpied, pp. 173–190. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, A. 1996. “Equipment for the Field.” In: Cultures of Natural History, ed. N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary, pp. 358–377. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen-Hollerbach, A. 1996. “Of Sangfroid and the Sphinx Moths: Cruelty, Public Relations, and the Growth of Entomology in England, 1800–1840.” Osiris 11: 201–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lightman, B. 1997. “ ‘The Voices of Nature': Popularizing Victorian Science.” In: Victorian Science in Context, ed. B. Lightman, pp. 187–211. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. 1970. A Sand County Almanac: with Essays on Conservation from Round River. New York: Ballantine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. D. 1976. “Amateurs and Professionals: The Institutional Emergence of British Plant Ecology.” Journal of the Society for the Bibliography of Natural History 7: 517–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. D. 1978. Locals and Cosmopolitans: A Model for the Social Organisation of Provincial Science in the Nineteenth Century. Sussex University: Unpublished MPhil Thesis.

  • Lowe, P. D. 1981. “The British Association and the Provincial Public.” In: The Parliament of Science: The British Association for the Advancement of Science, ed. R. MacLeod and P. Collins, pp. 118–144. Northwood: Science Reviews, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, P. D. 1982. “Yorkshire Naturalists in the History of Ecology.” The Naturalist 107: 135–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowerson, J. R. 1965. The Political Career of Sir Edward Baines (1800–1890). Leeds University: Unpublished MA Thesis.

  • MacLeod, R. 1996. “The Support of Victorian Science: The Endowment of Research Movement in Great Britain, 1868–1900.” In: Public Science and Public Policy in Victorian England, ed. R. MacLeod, pp. 197–230. Aldershot: Variorum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, L. C. 1877. “Museums.” Nature 16: 360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, L. C. 1897a. Thirty Years of Teaching. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, L. C. 1897b. “The Study of Life-Histories by Local Societies.” The Halifax Naturalist and Record of the Scientific Society 2: 105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, L. C. 1904. House, Garden and Field: A Collection of Short Nature Studies. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miall, L. C. and Denny, A. 1886. The Structure and Life-History of the Cockroach (Periplaneta Orientalis): An Introduction to the Study of Insects. London/Leeds:Reeve/Jackson.

  • Morrell, J. 1990. “Professionalisation.” In: Companion to the History of Modern Science, ed. R. C. Olby et al., pp. 980–989. London: Routledge.

  • Murray, J. A.H. (ed.). 1888–1933. A New English Dictionary: On Historical Principles. Oxford: Clarendon.

  • Munson, J. 1991. The Nonconformists: In Search of a Lost Culture. London: SPCK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuttall, R. H. 1981. “The First Microscope of Henry Clifton Sorby.” Technology and Culture 22: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyhart, L. K. 1998. “Creating a ‘Public’ Nature and a ‘Professional’ Nature: The New Museum Idea in German Natural History.” Seminar Paper delivered at the Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, Manchester University, 24th February.

  • Parsons, H. F. 1877. “Hints on Natural History Collecting.” The Naturalist 3: 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, E. A.W. 1915. “W. Denison Roebuck.” Transactions of the Lincolnshire Naturalists’ Union. Reprint: 7 pp.

  • Pickstone, J. V. 1993. “Ways of Knowing: Towards a Historical Sociology of Science, Technology and Medicine.” British Journal for the History of Science 26: 433–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickstone, J. V. 1994. “Museological Science? The Place of the Analytical/Comparative in 19th-Century Science, Technology and Medicine.” History of Science 32: 111–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, W. S. 1922. Sheffield Literary and Philosophical Society: A Centenary Retrospect, 1822–1922. Sheffield: Northend.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch, A. 1997. “Parables and Parodies: Margaret Gatty's Audiences in the Parables from Nature.” Children's Literature 25: 137–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, W. J. 1966. Professional Men: The Rise of the Professional Classes in Nineteenth-Century England. London: Weidenfield and Nicholson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reingold, N. 1976. “Defintions and Speculations: The Professionalization of Science in America in the Nineteenth Century.” In: The Pursuit of Knowledge in the Early American Republic: American Scientific and Learned Societies from Colonial Times to the CivilWar, ed. A. Oleson and S. C. Brown, pp. 33–69. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, D. 1987. “Sport, Hegemony and the Middle Class: The Victorian Mountaineers.” Theory, Culture and Society 4: 579–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roebuck, W. D. 1867–1871. Diary. Manuscript: West Yorkshire Archives.

  • Roebuck, W. D. 1871–1876. Scrapbooks. Manuscript: West Yorkshire Archives.

  • Roebuck, W. D. 1904. Salient Features in the History of the Yorkshire Naturalists’ Union. London: Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. 1972. The Universities and British Industry 1850–1970. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, M. 1975. The Universities in the Nineteenth Century. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, A. 1994a. “Science in the Pub: Artisan Botanists in Early Nineteenth-Century Lancashire.” History of Science 32: 269–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secord, A. 1994b. “Corresponding Interests: Artisans and Gentlemen in Nineteenth-Century Natural History.” British Journal for the History of Science 27: 383–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheail, J. 1987. Seventy-Five Years in Ecology: The British Ecological Society. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffield, S. L. 1997. Beyond the Mask of Gender: Three Victorian Scientist-Naturalists. York University, Ontario: Unpublished PhD Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shteir, A. B. 1996. Cultivating Women, Cultivating Science: Flora's Daughters and Botany in England 1760 to 1860. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J. 1872. “On the Study of Natural History.” Yorkshire Naturalists’ Recorder 2: 21–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. S. 1960. A History of Metallography: The Development of Ideas on the Structure of Metals Before 1890. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. G. 1903. “Botanical Survey for Local Naturalists’ Societies.” The Naturalist: 5–13.

  • Smith, W. G. and Moss, C. E. 1903. “Geographical Distribution of Vegetation in Yorkshire.” Geographical Journal 21: 375–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. G. and Rankin, W. M. 1903. Geographical Distribution of Vegetation in Yorkshire: Part II: Harrogate and Skipton District. Edinburgh: Bartholemew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorby, H. C. 1859–1908. Diaries. Manuscript: Sheffield University Library Special Collections.

  • Sorby, H. C. 1876a. “On Microscopes.” In:Handbook of the Special Loan Collection of Scientific Apparatus, pp. 327–339. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorby, H. C. 1876b. “Unencumbered Research: A Personal Experience.” In:Essays on the Endowment of Research, ed. C. Appleton, pp. 149–175. London: King.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorby, H. C. 1897. Fifty Years of Scientific Research. Sheffield: Independent Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. and Griesemer, J. R. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907– 1939.” Social Studies of Science 19: 387–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansley, A. G. 1902. “Research in British Ecology.” New Phytologist 1: 84–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——1931. “Obituary Notice. Charles Edward Moss.”Journal of Ecology 19: 209–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——1947. “The Early History of Modern Plant Ecology in Britain.”Journal of Ecology 35: 130–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J. W. and Roebuck, W. D. 1884. Monograph of the Land and Freshwater Mollusca of the British Isles. Leeds: Taylor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wager, H. 1922. “Louis Compton Miall, 1842–1921.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B93: x–xix.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witz, A. 1990. “Patriarchy and Professions: The Gendered Politics of Occupational Closure.” Sociology 24: 675–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worster, D. 1977. Nature's Economy: The Roots of Ecology. San Francisco: Sierra Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, N. 1980. “The Religious Life of Victorian Leeds.” In:A History of Modern Leeds, ed. D. Fraser, pp. 250–269. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yorkshire Philosophical Society. 1972. Annual Report for the Year 1971: One Hundred and Fiftieth Anniversary 1822–1972. York: Morley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of History and Philosophy of Science, School of Philosophy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, U.K.

    Samuel J.M.M. Alberti

  2. Center for Nineteenth Century Studies, School of English Literature, University of Sheffield, Shearwood Road, Sheffield, S10 2TD, U.K.

    Samuel J.M.M. Alberti

Authors
  1. Samuel J.M.M. Alberti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alberti, S.J. Amateurs and Professionals in One County: Biology and Natural History in Late Victorian Yorkshire. Journal of the History of Biology 34, 115–147 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010373912743

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010373912743

Search

Navigation