Skip to main content

Non-Cooperation In Dialogue Logic

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Aurelius, Marcus: 1944, in A. S. L. Farquharson (ed.), Meditations, 2 volumes, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Axelrod, R.: 1975, The Evolution of Cooperation, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barth, E. M. and E. C. W. Krabbe: 1982, From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation, de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bench-Capon, T. J. M.: 1990, Knowledge Representation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, B.: 1999,'Approximate Truth: A Paraconsistent Account,’ (unpublished).

  6. Carlson, L.: 1983, Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cawsey, A.: 1990,'A Computational Model of Explanatory Discourse: Local Interactions in a Plan-Based Explanation,’ in N. Luff (ed.), Computers and Conversation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  8. van Eemeren, F. H. and R. Grootendorst: 1987,'Fallacies in Pragma-Dialectical Perspective,’ Argumentation 1.

  9. Finkelstein, A. and H. Fuks: 1990,'Conversation Analysis and Specification,’ in N. Luff (ed.), Computers and Conversation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gabbay, D. and J. Woods: forthcoming, The Dynamics of Practical Reasoning, forthcoming book.

  11. Gabbay, D. and A. Hunter: 1991,'Inconsistency Made Respectable, Part 1,’ in Lecture Notes in AI, Vol. 55, pp. 19-32.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gabbay, D. and J. Woods: 1999,'Ad Baculum is Not a Fallacy,’ in F. H. van Eemeren et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Argumentation, International Society for the Study of Argument, SIC-Sat, 1999, Amsterdam, pp. 221-224.

  13. Galton M. and B. Simon (eds): 1980, Progress and Performance in the Primary Classroom, Routledge Kegan-Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Girle, R. A.: 1993,'Dialogue and Entrenchment,’ in Proceedings of the Sixth Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Symposium, Fort Lauderdale, pp. 185-189.

  15. Girle, R. A.: 1996,'Commands in Dialogue Logic,’ in D. Gabbay and H. J. Ohlbach (eds.), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 246-260.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grice, P.: 1989, Studies in the Ways of Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hintikka, J. and J. Bachman: 1991, What If...?, Mayfield, Mountain View, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Holyoak, K. J. and P. Thagard: 1995, Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jackson, P.: 1990, Introduction to Expert Systems, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1987, What is Closer-to-the-Truth?, Rodopi, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis, D. K.: 1969, Conventions, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mackenzie, J. D.: 1979,'How to Stop Talking to Tortoises,’ Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic XX, 705-717.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mackenzie, J. D.: 1981,'The Dialectics of Logic,’ Logique et Analyse 94, 159-177.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mackenzie, J. D.: 1985,'No Logic Before Friday,’ Synthese 63, 329-341.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mackenzie, J. D.: 1990,'Four Dialogue Systems,’ Studia Logica LXIX, 567-583.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Moore, D. and D. Hobbs: 1969,'Computational Uses of Philosophical Dialogue Games,’ Informal Logic 18, 131-163.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Niiniluoto, I.: 1987, Truthlikeness, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oddie, G.: 1986, Likeness to Truth, Reidel, Dordrecht and Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pilkington, R. M.: 1992, Intelligent Help, Communicating With Knowledge Based Systems, Paul Chapman Publishing.

  30. Reichman, R.: 1985, Getting Computers to Talk Like You and Me: Discourse Context, Focus, and Semantics (An ATN Model), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Frohlich, D. M. and P. Luff: 1990,'Applying the Technology of Conversation to the Technology for Conversation to the Technology for Conversation,’ in N. Luff (ed.), Computers and Conversation, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shriffrin, D.: 1985,'Laurie Carlson: Dialogue Games, An Approach to Discourse Analysis,’ (review article), Language and Society 144, 98-100.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shneiderman, B.: 1992, Designing the User Interface-Strategies for Effective Computer Interaction, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Walton, D. N.: 1985,'New Directions in the Logic of Dialogue,’ Synthese 63, 259-274.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Walton, D. N.: 1995, A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy, The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Walton, D. and E. Krabbe: 1995, Commitment in Dialogue. SUNY Press.

  37. Woods, J.: 2001, Paradox and Paraconsistency: Conflict Resolution in the Abstract Sciences, to appear.

  38. Woods, J. and M. Gabbay: 2000,'Did-Didn't Strategies in Dialogue Logic,’ to appear.

  39. Woods, J. and B. Hudak: 1989,'By Parity of Reasoning,’ Informal Logic XI, 125-139.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Woods, J., A. Irvine and D. Walton: 2000, Argument: Critical Thinking, Logic and the Fallacies, Prentice-Hall, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Woods, J. and D. Walton: 1982, Argument: The Logic of the Fallacies, McGraw-Hill Ryerson, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zwart, S. D.: 1998, Approach to the Truth: Verisimilitude and Truthlikeness, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gabbay, D., Woods, J. Non-Cooperation In Dialogue Logic. Synthese 127, 161–186 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010370420383

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dialogue Logic