Skip to main content
Log in

Suitability of Moist Olive Pomace as Soil Amendment

  • Published:
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A laboratory experiment was performedto evaluate the suitability of moist olive pomace(MOP) as soil amendment. Moist olive pomace wasobtained from a new olive-oil industrial processcalled the `two-phases method'. Soil samples weremixed with MOP to approximate a field application of40 t ha-1 and incubated under aerobic conditionsat 20 °C and 60% of soil water holdingcapacity. To estimate the effect of different loadingrates and N supply on mineralization, 40, 80, 120 and160 t ha-1 of MOP and 200 ppm of N as(NH4)2SO4 were used. CumulativeCO2-C evolution, total microbial activity andbiomass-C were monitored during a 60-day period.Results indicate that the CO2-C evolution fromMOP depends on soil type and is temporarily inhibitedin acidic soils. Evolution of CO2-C increaseswith incremental addition of MOP, but the percentagesof the added C that were mineralized decreased withincreasing application rates. Mineral N supplementsresult in more efficiency of the mineralizationprocess. Among the kinetic models tested to describethe mineralization dynamics, a first-order exponentialmodel including a constant term provides the best fitto the experimental data. Both amount and activity ofsoil microbial biomass are enhanced by MOP added atthe 40 t ha-1 rate, at least in the first periodof incubation. At higher rates of MOP addition, aconstant increase of biomass C during incubation isobserved, while the biological activity decreases atthe end of incubation. Following application ofmineral N, both amount and activity of microbialbiomass is enhanced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonde, T. A. and Rosswall, T.: 1987, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 1508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, F. E.: 1986, Soil Sci. 141, 208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardelli, R. and Benitez, C.: 1998, Agr. Med. 128, 171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey, H. J.: 1969, Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc. 33,893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellert, B. H. and Bettany, J. R.: 1988, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 1692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson, D. S. and Powlson, D. S.: 1976, Soil Biol. and Biochem. 8, 167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. A.: 1984, Commun. Soil Sci. and Plant. Anal. 15, 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J. N., Amato, M. and Zhou, L. K.: 1994, Soil Biol. and Biochem. 26, 821.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina, J. A. E., Clapp, C. E. and Larson, W. E.: 1980, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R.: 1982, Methods of Soil Analysis, Am. Soc. Agron. Monogr., Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A., 1159 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviozzi, A., Levi-Minzi, R., Riffaldi, R. and Lupetti, A.: 1991, Agrochimica 35, 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviozzi, A., Riffaldi, R., Levi-Minzi, R., Scagnozzi, A. and Vanni G.: 1993, Biores. Technol. 44, 223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saviozzi, A., Levi-Minzi, R., Riffaldi, R. and Cardelli, R.: 1997, L'Informatore Agrario 38, 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnurer, J. and Rosswall, T.: 1982, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Q. R., Xu, S. M. and Shi, R. M.: 1993, Pedosphere 3, 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shen, Q. R., Yu, L., Liu, Z. P. and Mao, Z. S.: 1994, Acta Pedologica Sinica 31, 287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, G. and Smith, S. J.: 1972, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C. and Jenkinson, D. S.: 1987, Soil Biol. and Biochem. 19, 403.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saviozzi, A., Levi-Minzi, R., Cardelli, R. et al. Suitability of Moist Olive Pomace as Soil Amendment. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 128, 13–22 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010361807181

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010361807181

Navigation